Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

The Nationality of Reasoning2Seymour Martin Lipset, “Fascism – Left, Right, and Center,” in Political Man:The Social Bases of Politics (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,1981), pp. 127-183.3See Jeremy Noakes “German Conservatives and the Third Reich: An AmbiguousRelationship,” in Blinkhorn, ed., Fascists and Conservatives, pp. 71-98.4See George L. Mosse, The Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolismand Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars through the ThirdReich (Ithaca: Cornell Paperbacks, 1991), pp. 207-217.5Barrington Moore, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord andPeasant in the Making of the Modern World (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books,1977), pp. viii-xvi.6Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, pp. 433-453.7Sorin Alexandrescu, Paradoxul Român (The Romanian paradox) (Bucharest:Univers, 1998), p. 16.8For the problem of elites in the context of the post-1918 process of nationbuilding,see Irina Livezeanu, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism,Nation Building & Ethnic Struggle, 1918-1930 (Ithaca: Cornell UniversityPress, 1995).9Livezeanu, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania, pp. 218-240.10 On the organicist element in conservatism, see Anthony Quinton, The Politicsof Imperfection (Boston: Faber and Faber, 1978).11 Quoted in Livezeanu, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania, pp. 230-31.12 See Zigu Ornea, Anii treizeci: Extrema dreaptã româneascã (The thirties: TheRomanian extreme right) (Bucharest: Editura Fundaþiei Culturale Române,1996). An English version is also available, see Zigu Ornea, The RomanianExtreme Right in the Nineteen Thirties (Boulder: East European Monographs,1999). Hereafter page quotations are given to the Romanian edition.13 Vasile Marin, “Crez de generaþie: ideologia faptei” (The credo of a generation:Ideology of the deed), Axa (22 January 1933), pp. 3-5. Also quoted by Ornea,Anii treizeci, p. 58.14 Ornea, Anii treizeci, pp. 102-103.15 Ornea, Anii treizeci, p. 281.16 The most representative sources of a biological conception of Romanianness,upon which this analysis had been based are Nae Ionescu, Roza vînturilor (Thewind rose) (Bucharest: Roza vînturilor, 1990); and Nichifor Crainic, Ortodoxieºi etnocraþie (Orthodoxy and Ethnocracy) (Bucharest: Albatros, 1997).17 Mihai Ralea, “Doctrina dreptei” (Doctrine of the right), in Fenomenul românesc(The Romanian phenomenon) (Bucharest: Albatros, 1997), pp. 297-307.18 Tudor Vianu, “Libertatea cugetãrii” (Liberty of thought), Gîndul vremii 3(15 March 1933).19 See Nae Ionescu, “A fi ‘Bun Român’” (Being a “Good Romanian”), in Rozavînturilor, pp. 194-198.91