12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

community. Interestingly, ethnic parties, at least in East-CentralEurope, can be considered liberal parties. Their general program focuseson decentralization, promotion of the principle of subsidiarity, freedomof the press, freedom of association, political pluralism, human dignity,etc. These are all democratic <strong>and</strong> liberal principles, <strong>and</strong> can beconsidered as common goods for the whole population of the state.Nevertheless, these principles are favorable for the nationalization ofthe national minority. The program regarding the national minorityitself is less liberal, moreover, it is exclusivist. The democratization ofthe respective state is important in the first instance to create a favorablearea for the development of the national minority’s own system ofinstitutions.Elite theories are usually of little help in analyzing national minorityelites. The main reason for this shortcoming is that elite theories focuson the formal aspects of acquiring power, while in the case of nationalminorities the substantial aspect is more important. In my underst<strong>and</strong>ing,the substantial aspect is that members of national minority elites originatefrom a particular national or ethnic group <strong>and</strong> represent the goals ofa particular national minority. On this basis, one can say that the frameworkof theories of nationalism offers better results, especially in the caseof East-Central Europe, where nation-building <strong>and</strong> the politics of nationalizationare directed from above. Obviously, there are power struggleswithin the national minority elites, <strong>and</strong> the elite of the national minoritycompetes with other elites in the political sphere. However, these strugglesrarely go so far as to question the minority’s essential goals. My interpretationis that the political differences within these minority elites areabout competing projects of minority nation-building.As described above, an ethnic party is at the same time a politicalparty <strong>and</strong> a social organization that represents the goals of the nationalminority <strong>and</strong> strengthens its institutions. The political elite of the nationalminority is composed of professional politicians, representatives of the“ethno-civil” society <strong>and</strong> intellectuals. All three categories – that are notnecessarily homogeneous groups – act in the same political sphere, definethe politics of the party, <strong>and</strong> set the priorities for the society.The <strong>Hungarian</strong> Political Elite in Romania<strong>Nation</strong>alizing Minorities <strong>and</strong> Homel<strong>and</strong> PoliticsThe <strong>Hungarian</strong> Democratic Union in Romania (HDUR), formed inDecember 1989, considers itself, <strong>and</strong> is considered by the other actors in<strong>Romanian</strong> politics, as the sole representative of <strong>Hungarian</strong>s in Romania. 14As an ethnic party, it acts in the <strong>Romanian</strong> political sphere, <strong>and</strong> is organized<strong>and</strong> functions as any other party. In the political arena, the party partici-257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!