12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Intellectual Horizons of Liberal <strong>Nation</strong>alism in Hungaryabsence of <strong>Hungarian</strong> publications, he could only rely on a limited rangeof sources <strong>and</strong> his statistical data was drawn on foreign books. Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ingthese shortcomings, Horváth’s account, especially when completedwith a second part, entitled “The history of trade <strong>and</strong> industry in thelast three centuries,” was a remarkable achievement. His Central <strong>and</strong> EastEuropean contemporaries also sought to tackle issues of commerce <strong>and</strong>industry. They managed to devise, even if they could not fully exploit thepotential of the topic, a new framework of historiography, which sought tosupersede the history of royal dynasties. However, most of them did notget as far in their analysis as Horváth.Also, Horváth went further than his contemporaries in the applicationof foreign material on trade <strong>and</strong> commerce to the conditions of hisown nation, for which he borrowed the ideological <strong>and</strong> intellectual frameworkof a h<strong>and</strong>ful of German historians of the late-Enlightenment. Hismain inspiration came, as mentioned above, from the works of ArnoldHeeren, but he also drew on other representatives <strong>and</strong> transmitters of thelate Enlightenment, particularly the German Aufklärung, such as WilhelmWachsmuth, Ludwig T. Spittler, or Karl D. Hüllmann. For Horváth, whothought that “the flowers of a more noble humanity” can only blossomwhere a powerful middle-class exists, the German historians’ underst<strong>and</strong>ingof the middle class as the main catalyst of societal developmentseemed especially relevant.The works of the above-mentioned German historians, especiallytheir reading of European history as a transition from a feudal to a modern<strong>and</strong> commercial social system, fit into the broader framework ofEnlightenment historiography. This interpretation was developed by thehistories of Voltaire, Hume, Robertson <strong>and</strong> Gibbon, whose main concernwas to show how the medieval feudal-agricultural society, characterized byan absence of all but aristocratic liberties <strong>and</strong> by oppressive aristocraticjurisdiction, was eventually eroded by the incorporation of cities, thedevelopment of new technologies, the expansion of domestic <strong>and</strong> overseasmarket <strong>and</strong> the relative decline of aristocratic wealth. 8 Besides the influenceof the aforementioned German scholars, a close examination ofHorváth’s ideas on trade <strong>and</strong> industry reveals similarities with the mentalityof the Scottish Enlightenment, especially William Robertson. This isnot accidental: although there is no direct evidence of Horváth’s familiaritywith Robertson’s works, the preference of these German historians(especially the Göttingen school) for the representatives of the ScottishEnlightenment seems to have had an impact on Horváth’s work.Montesquieu was another favorite thinker of the Aufklärung <strong>and</strong> hisworks enjoyed great popularity in Hungary in the Reform Era. Horváthwas not only familiar with his writings, but also made a “contribution” to27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!