12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONSTANTIN IORDACHIcolonization substantially altered the relationship between the threemajor ethnic groups in the province. The <strong>Romanian</strong> population skyrocketedfrom 31,177 in 1879, to 43,671 in 1880, to 119,562 in 1900 <strong>and</strong> to216,425 in 1913. In only 25 years, the ratio of ethnic <strong>Romanian</strong>s in NorthernDobrogea thus grew from a relative to an absolute majority (from36.3% in 1880 to 52.5% in 1905). The territorial distribution of <strong>Romanian</strong>schanged as well, since they penetrated areas previously inhabited byTurks <strong>and</strong> Tartars, or by Bulgarians, especially in the north, around Tulcea<strong>and</strong> Babadag, <strong>and</strong> in the south, at the border with Bulgaria. The <strong>Romanian</strong>population in Dobrogea was very heterogeneous, being composed ofnative Dicieni (24.2% of the total <strong>Romanian</strong> population), WallachianCojani (39.5%), Moldavians (8.0%), Bessarabians (5.6%), Mocani fromTransylvania <strong>and</strong> the Banat (21.8%), Bukovinians (0.1%), <strong>and</strong> from otherforeign countries (0.8%). 61 These groups retained strong regional identities,which disappeared only gradually through pan-<strong>Romanian</strong> inter-marriages<strong>and</strong> integration into the wider <strong>Romanian</strong> national community.The major changes that occurred in the ethnic composition ofDobrogea also affected the pattern of l<strong>and</strong> property in the province.In 1882, Dobrogea had 175,075 hectares of arable l<strong>and</strong>. Consideredtogether, Turks <strong>and</strong> Tartars were the leading l<strong>and</strong>owning ethnic group inthe province, with almost 50% of the arable l<strong>and</strong>, followed by <strong>Romanian</strong>s<strong>and</strong> Bulgarians, both with shares of approximately 23% of the total l<strong>and</strong>. 62The colonization process radically altered these proportions. By 1905, thecultivated l<strong>and</strong> increased to 685,449 hectares. Significantly, <strong>Romanian</strong>sbecame the dominant l<strong>and</strong>owners, possessing a share of about 63% ofDobrogea’s l<strong>and</strong>. By contrast, the portion possessed by Turks <strong>and</strong> Tartarsdramatically decreased to only 7.0% of the l<strong>and</strong>. The share owned by Bulgarians,while increasing in surface from 38,038 to 129,231 hectares,decreased nevertheless in proportion to 19% of the total arable l<strong>and</strong>.Thus, by 1905 the <strong>Romanian</strong>s had already managed to acquire approximatelytwo-thirds of Dobrogea’s l<strong>and</strong>ed property.2.6 POLITICS OF IDENTITY IN A BORDER REGION: CULTURAL HOMOGE-NIZATION, RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION AND EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMIN NORTHERN DOBROGEAEthnic assimilation in Dobrogea was accompanied by a cultural offensive ofthe <strong>Romanian</strong> state, based on two main pillars: church <strong>and</strong> school. Thus,<strong>Romanian</strong> authorities pursued a determined religious policy in the regionthat subjected the Dobrogean churches to the authority of the <strong>Romanian</strong>Orthodox Church, <strong>and</strong> built numerous religious edifices. The <strong>Romanian</strong>state also organized a comprehensive network of schools in order to spread136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!