12.07.2015 Views

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aristotle</strong>something else should master him and drag him about like aslave. Socrates in fact contended generally against the theory,maintaining there is no such state as that <strong>of</strong> Imperfect Self-Control, for that no one acts contrary to what is best conceivingit to be best but by reason <strong>of</strong> ignorance what is best.With all due respect to Socrates, his account <strong>of</strong> the matteris at variance with plain facts, and we must inquire with respectto the affection, if it be caused by ignorance what is thenature <strong>of</strong> the ignorance: for that the man so failing does notsuppose his acts to be right before he is under the influence<strong>of</strong> passion is quite plain.<strong>The</strong>re are people who partly agree with Socrates and partlynot: that nothing can be stronger than Knowledge they agree,but that no man acts in contravention <strong>of</strong> his conviction <strong>of</strong>what is better they do not agree; and so they say that it is notKnowledge, but only Opinion, which the man in questionhas and yet yields to the instigation <strong>of</strong> his pleasures.[Sidenote:1146a] But then, if it is Opinion and not Knowledge,that is it the opposing conception be not strong butonly mild (as in the case <strong>of</strong> real doubt), the not abiding by itin the face <strong>of</strong> strong lusts would be excusable: but wickednessis not excusable, nor is anything which deserves blame.Well then, is it Practical Wisdom which in this case <strong>of</strong>fersopposition: for that is the strongest principle? <strong>The</strong> suppositionis absurd, for we shall have the same man uniting PracticalWisdom and Imperfect Self-Control, and surely no singleperson would maintain that it is consistent with the character<strong>of</strong> Practical Wisdom to do voluntarily what is very wrong;and besides we have shown before that the very mark <strong>of</strong> aman <strong>of</strong> this character is aptitude to act, as distinguished frommere knowledge <strong>of</strong> what is right; because he is a man conversantwith particular details, and possessed <strong>of</strong> all the othervirtues.Again, if the having strong and bad lusts is necessary tothe idea <strong>of</strong> the man <strong>of</strong> Self-Control, this character cannot beidentical with the man <strong>of</strong> Perfected Self-Mastery, becausethe having strong desires or bad ones does not enter into theidea <strong>of</strong> this latter character: and yet the man <strong>of</strong> Self-Controlmust have such: for suppose them good; then the moral statewhich should hinder a man from following their suggestionsmust be bad, and so Self-Control would not be in all casesgood: suppose them on the other hand to be weak and not150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!