12.07.2015 Views

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aristotle</strong>the mean between him and the man <strong>of</strong> Imperfect Self-Control:that is to say, the latter fails to abide by them because <strong>of</strong>somewhat too much, the former because <strong>of</strong> somewhat toolittle; while the man <strong>of</strong> Self-Control abides by them, and neverchanges by reason <strong>of</strong> anything else than such conclusions.Now <strong>of</strong> course since Self-Control is good both the contrary<strong>State</strong>s must be bad, as indeed they plainly are: but becausethe one <strong>of</strong> them is seen in few persons, and but rarelyin them, Self-Control comes to be viewed as if opposed onlyto the Imperfection <strong>of</strong> it, just as Perfected Self-Mastery isthought to be opposed only to utter want <strong>of</strong> Self-Control.[Sidenote: 1152a] Again, as many terms are used in theway <strong>of</strong> similitude, so people have come to talk <strong>of</strong> the Self-Control <strong>of</strong> the man <strong>of</strong> Perfected Self-Mastery in the way <strong>of</strong>similitude: for the man <strong>of</strong> Self-Control and the man <strong>of</strong> PerfectedSelf-Mastery have this in common, that they do nothingagainst Right Reason on the impulse <strong>of</strong> bodily pleasures,but then the former has bad desires, the latter not; and thelatter is so constituted as not even to feel pleasure contraryto his Reason, the former feels but does not yield to it. Likeagain are the man <strong>of</strong> Imperfect Self-Control and he who isutterly destitute <strong>of</strong> it, though in reality distinct: both followbodily pleasures, but the latter under a notion that it is theproper line for him to take, his former without any suchnotion.XAnd it is not possible for the same man to be at once a man<strong>of</strong> Practical Wisdom and <strong>of</strong> Imperfect Self-Control: becausethe character <strong>of</strong> Practical Wisdom includes, as we showedbefore, goodness <strong>of</strong> moral character. And again, it is notknowledge merely, but aptitude for action, which constitutesPractical Wisdom: and <strong>of</strong> this aptitude the man <strong>of</strong> ImperfectSelf-Control is destitute. But there is no reason why the Cleverman should not be <strong>of</strong> Imperfect Self-Control: and the reasonwhy some men are occasionally thought to be men <strong>of</strong>Practical Wisdom, and yet <strong>of</strong> Imperfect Self-Control, is this,that Cleverness differs from Practical Wisdom in the way Istated in a former book, and is very near it so far as the intellectualelement is concerned but differs in respect <strong>of</strong> the moralchoice.166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!