12.07.2015 Views

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aristotle</strong>relative to the individual, and the matter wherein and uponwhich he has to spend. And a man is not denominated Magnificentfor spending as he should do in small or ordinarythings, as, for instance,“Oft to the wandering beggar did I give,”but for doing so in great matters: that is to say, the Magnificentman is liberal, but the liberal is not thereby Magnificent.<strong>The</strong> falling short <strong>of</strong> such a state is called Meanness, theexceeding it Vulgar Pr<strong>of</strong>usion, Want <strong>of</strong> Taste, and so on;which are faulty, not because they are on an excessive scale inrespect <strong>of</strong> right objects but, because they show <strong>of</strong>f in improperobjects, and in improper manner: <strong>of</strong> these we willspeak presently. <strong>The</strong> Magnificent man is like a man <strong>of</strong> skill,because he can see what is fitting, and can spend largely ingood taste; for, as we said at the commencement, [Sidenote:1122b] the confirmed habit is determined by the separateacts <strong>of</strong> working, and by its object-matter.Well, the expenses <strong>of</strong> the Magnificent man are great andfitting: such also are his works (because this secures the expenditurebeing not great merely, but befitting the work). Sothen the work is to be proportionate to the expense, and thisagain to the work, or even above it: and the Magnificentman will incur such expenses from the motive <strong>of</strong> honour,this being common to all the virtues, and besides he will doit with pleasure and lavishly; excessive accuracy in calculationbeing Mean. He will consider also how a thing may bedone most beautifully and fittingly, rather, than for how muchit may be done, and how at the least expense.So the Magnificent man must be also a liberal man, becausethe liberal man will also spend what he ought, and inright manner: but it is the Great, that is to say tke large scale,which is distinctive <strong>of</strong> the Magnificent man, the object-matter<strong>of</strong> liberality being the same, and without spending moremoney than another man he will make the work more magnificent.I mean, the excellence <strong>of</strong> a possession and <strong>of</strong> a workis not the same: as a piece <strong>of</strong> property that thing is mostvaluable which is worth most, gold for instance; but as awork that which is great and beautiful, because the contemplation<strong>of</strong> such an object is admirable, and so is that which isMagnificent. So the excellence <strong>of</strong> a work is Magnificence on89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!