12.07.2015 Views

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aristotle</strong>are three, in number equal to the objects <strong>of</strong> it, since in theline <strong>of</strong> each there may be “mutual affection mutually known.”Now they who have Friendship for one another desire oneanother’s good according to the motive <strong>of</strong> their Friendship;accordingly they whose motive is utility have no Friendshipfor one another really, but only in so far as some good arisesto them from one another.And they whose motive is pleasure are in like case: I mean,they have Friendship for men <strong>of</strong> easy pleasantry, not becausethey are <strong>of</strong> a given character but because they are pleasant tothemselves. So then they whose motive to Friendship is utilitylove their friends for what is good to themselves; theywhose motive is pleasure do so for what is pleasurable tothemselves; that is to say, not in so far as the friend beloved_is_ but in so far as he is useful or pleasurable. <strong>The</strong>se Friendshipsthen are a matter <strong>of</strong> result: since the object is not belovedin that he is the man he is but in that he furnishesadvantage or pleasure as the case may be. Such Friendshipsare <strong>of</strong> course very liable to dissolution if the parties do notcontinue alike: I mean, that the others cease to have anyFriendship for them when they are no longer pleasurable oruseful. Now it is the nature <strong>of</strong> utility not to be permanentbut constantly varying: so, <strong>of</strong> course, when the motive whichmade them friends is vanished, the Friendship likewise dissolves;since it existed only relatively to those circumstances.Friendship <strong>of</strong> this kind is thought to exist principally amongthe old (because men at that time <strong>of</strong> life pursue not what ispleasurable but what is pr<strong>of</strong>itable); and in such, <strong>of</strong> men intheir prime and <strong>of</strong> the young, as are given to the pursuit <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>it. <strong>The</strong>y that are such have no intimate intercourse withone another; for sometimes they are not even pleasurable toone another; nor, in fact, do they desire such intercourse unlesstheir friends are pr<strong>of</strong>itable to them, because they are pleasurableonly in so far as they have hopes <strong>of</strong> advantage. Withthese Friendships is commonly ranked that <strong>of</strong> hospitality.But the Friendship <strong>of</strong> the young is thought to be based onthe motive <strong>of</strong> pleasure: because they live at the beck and call<strong>of</strong> passion and generally pursue what is pleasurable to themselvesand the object <strong>of</strong> the present moment: and as their agechanges so likewise do their pleasures.This is the reason why they form and dissolve Friendshipsrapidly: since the Friendship changes with the pleasurable178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!