12.07.2015 Views

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

The Ethics of Aristotle - Penn State Hazleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aristotle</strong>like a mere piece <strong>of</strong> property.[Sidenote: 1170a] If then the being happy consists in livingand working, and the good man’s working is in itselfexcellent and pleasurable (as we said at the commencement<strong>of</strong> the treatise), and if what is our own reckons among thingspleasurable, and if we can view our neighbours better thanourselves and their actions better than we can our own, thenthe actions <strong>of</strong> their Friends who are good men are pleasurableto the good; inasmuch as they have both the requisiteswhich are naturally pleasant. So the man in the highest state<strong>of</strong> happiness will need Friends <strong>of</strong> this kind, since he desiresto contemplate good actions, and actions <strong>of</strong> his own, whichthose <strong>of</strong> his friend, being a good man, are. Again, commonopinion requires that the Happy man live with pleasure tohimself: now life is burthensome to a man in solitude, for itis not easy to work continuously by one’s self, but in companywith, and in regard to others, it is easier, and thereforethe working, being pleasurable in itself will be more continuous(a thing which should be in respect <strong>of</strong> the Happyman); for the good man, in that he is good takes pleasure inthe actions which accord with Virtue and is annoyed at thosewhich spring from Vice, just as a musical man is pleasedwith beautiful music and annoyed by bad. And besides, as<strong>The</strong>ognis says, Virtue itself may be improved by practice,from living with the good.And, upon the following considerations more purely metaphysical,it will probably appear that the good friend is naturallychoiceworthy to the good man. We have said before,that whatever is naturally good is also in itself good and pleasantto the good man; now the fact <strong>of</strong> living, so far as animalsare concerned, is characterised generally by the power <strong>of</strong> sentience,in man it is characterised by that <strong>of</strong> sentience, or <strong>of</strong>rationality (the faculty <strong>of</strong> course being referred to the actualoperation <strong>of</strong> the faculty, certainly the main point is the actualoperation <strong>of</strong> it); so that living seems mainly to consist inthe act <strong>of</strong> sentience or exerting rationality: now the fact <strong>of</strong>living is in itself one <strong>of</strong> the things that are good and pleasant(for it is a definite totality, and whatever is such belongs tothe nature <strong>of</strong> good), but what is naturally good is good tothe good man: for which reason it seems to be pleasant toall. (Of course one must not suppose a life which is depravedand corrupted, nor one spent in pain, for that which is such215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!