12.07.2015 Views

Board of Directors Meeting - 29 March 2012 - Devon Partnership ...

Board of Directors Meeting - 29 March 2012 - Devon Partnership ...

Board of Directors Meeting - 29 March 2012 - Devon Partnership ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong>, <strong>29</strong> <strong>March</strong> <strong>2012</strong>Agenda Item 4style meetings with Directorates were informing strategy development.Ian Harrison would provide a working draft <strong>of</strong> the questions and answerswithin the next week.oImplementation plan for innovations arising from the Seattle Tripwould be provided for the next meeting by Dr David Somerfield and HughGroves.007/12 – Quality & Safety CommitteeoooCQC reports had been circulated.Sickness absence had been discussed and considered by the Quality andSafety Committee.Review <strong>of</strong> urgent waiting times (28 days) would be considered by theCommittee at its next meeting.012/12 Safeguarding Children & Safeguarding Adults Annual Reports:ooLiz Davenport and Martin Ringrose have met to discuss metrics aroundreporting <strong>of</strong> CRB checks.The annual safeguarding children declaration had been completed. 013/12 – Audit Committee Report. Action was complete. Hugh Grovesconfirmed that greater understanding <strong>of</strong> the specification would be takenthrough the Audit Committee.015/12 – Any Other Business.oAttendance <strong>of</strong> NHS <strong>Devon</strong> at the Quality & Safety Committee: LornaCollingwood-Burke, Assistant Director <strong>of</strong> Quality for NHS <strong>Devon</strong>, had beennominated to attend.Quality and Safety034/12(item 5)Quality & Safety Committee ReportMembers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Board</strong> noted:The report, which was taken as read.That Monitor required the CQC to “sign <strong>of</strong>f” the actions taken by the Trust toaddress the findings <strong>of</strong> their review and that this could only be done threemonths post publication.That once sign <strong>of</strong>f had been achieved, the Trust was anticipated to have agreen rating against Monitor’s KPIs.That the Committee had expressed some concern over levels <strong>of</strong> sickness,which were understood to be too high. In addition to the remedial actionsoutlined in the report, the Committee noted the need for noted need forconstant vigilance, especially by line managers.That the Audit Committee would look at ways <strong>of</strong> improving on the limitedassurance currently extracted from clinical audit processes.Page 9 <strong>of</strong> 156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!