Protected Area Network in Orissa - Vasundhara

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Issues in Karlapat Sanctuary• Confusion over the area of SanctuaryAccording to the official sources (Wildlife Orissa 2004, Forest Department, GoO)the total area of the sanctuary is 147.66 sq.km. But, as mentioned in the WorkingPlan of Kalahandi Forest Division the actual area of the sanctuary is 175.50 sq kmswhich has been wrongly notified as 147.66 sq. kms in the official records. The stategovernment has however, not depicted the correct area of the sanctuary so far inany official record though the recommendation in the Working Plan was passedmany years ago.• Land issue and ban on Podu cultivation:Except three villages: Simelpadar and Tentulipadar of Karlapat GP andSorisbandel of Gunupur GP, all other 49 villages coming under the Sanctuary havebeen issued with pattas for the people's homestead lands. Hence, these threevillages are being treated as encroached settlements and rest as revenue villages.The people of these settlements are deprived of availing benefits of variouswelfare schemes such as Indira Awas Yojana, Antodaya and Annapurna Yojana,PDS, ICDS, primary health, basic education and even drinking water facilities etc.Since Simelpadar village has not been provided with pattas, unlike other pattaholding villages, the authorities didn’t feel the necessity of issuing notice to thevillagers regarding declaration of the sanctuary. At any point of time the villagerscould be evicted from their homeland without any former notice, because in theeyes of the FD the villagers are forestland encroachers. Last year they came toknow about declaration of the sanctuary from the local Soil Conservation officer.This year when the FD debarred them from practicing the traditional podu(shifting) cultivation they got confirmed about this.Not only this but restriction in collection of fuel wood and NTFPs has also beenimposed on them.• Livelihood issue and ban on NTFPBan has been imposed on collection and transportation of NTFPs in the entiresanctuary area. Forest products are not allowed to be transported in or out of thedemarcated area, which has certainly restricted the sustenance sources of the62
people. Without having access to the forest and forest produces the forest dwellersare getting increasingly dependent on wage labour for livelihood eraning.The most alarming thing is the imposition of ban on fuelwood collection. Thevillagers are restricted to pluck a piece of dried leaf and twig from the forest areaand violation of this has reportedly led to the most inhuman consequences in thehands of the FD. Sri Pulu Majhi, aged 14 of Simelpadar village was arrested by theForester red handed on 10 December 2004 while he was collecting a piece of fuelwood in the forest. After a collective request of the villagers and with a bribe of Rs.500/- he was freed.(This incidence was narrated in a meeting held in Simelpadaron 25 th December 2004).• Mining project threatening the wildlife existenceKarlapat an important habitation for the wild species like the rare black panther,leopards, elephants, Sambhar etc. The recent decision of the state government tohand over Khandualmali mountain located adjacent to the sanctuary to a privatecompany for bauxite mining is likely to put severe negative impacts on the forestecosystem alongwith wildlife therein. Even more important, the headwaters of themajor streams flowing through the sanctuary area i.e. Jakam Nala and Mulia Nadiarise from Khandualmali moundatin is proposed to be mined.Admitted rights and concessionsItems 'A' Class R.F Khesra/ Unreserves/ UDPFTimber No rights but certain concessi Timber of unreserved speciesFirewood existed.but reserved species allowedconcessional rateFollowing the ban imposed byGoO on tree felling in 1988, Firewood of all species allowedNistar paying tenants and ot of cost.villagers were restricted from feltrees and granted permissioncollect only dead wood and fa63
Page 1 and 2:
-----------------------------------
Page 3 and 4:
INTRODUCTIONThe word Conservation i
Page 5 and 6:
HISTORY OF CONSERVATIONEarly effort
Page 7 and 8:
From the Vedic to the Pre-Mughal pe
Page 9 and 10:
Protected Areas:Importance & Assess
Page 11 and 12: Categorization Of PAsIn the year 19
Page 13 and 14: opportunities for public enjoyment
Page 15 and 16: Establishment of Protected Areas in
Page 17 and 18: Support guidelines for the establis
Page 19 and 20: Protected Area Network in IndiaIndi
Page 21 and 22: NATIONAL PARKSThere are 92 existing
Page 23 and 24: Current PA Summary of India (as on
Page 25 and 26: Wetland Protected Areas and Waterbi
Page 27 and 28: 14. Nagarjunsagar-Srisailam 1982-83
Page 29 and 30: Protected Area Network in OrissaPro
Page 31 and 32: Badrama SanctuaryBadrama sanctuary,
Page 33 and 34: No. of Human Habitations insidethe
Page 35 and 36: Bamboo and bamboo related product c
Page 37 and 38: LocationAreaLegal Status of LandAcq
Page 39 and 40: Location (District)AreaLegal Status
Page 41 and 42: LocationAreaLocated in the District
Page 43 and 44: were now closed to hunting though f
Page 45 and 46: The CRZ regulation is to be enforce
Page 47 and 48: LocationAreaLegal Status of Land Ac
Page 49 and 50: households of Behentasahi and Dhola
Page 51 and 52: The tribal people are prevented fro
Page 53 and 54: LocationKhurda, Puri and ganjam dis
Page 55 and 56: LocationAreaDate of Notification U/
Page 57 and 58: Location Located in Kendrapara reve
Page 59 and 60: LocationLocated in the District of
Page 61: LocationAreaLegal Status of Land Ac
Page 65 and 66: Khalasuni SanctuaryKhalasuni sanctu
Page 67 and 68: Kotgarh SanctuaryKotgarh sanctuary,
Page 69 and 70: Issues in Kotgarh Sanctuary• Proc
Page 71 and 72: the limits of the sanctuary, which
Page 73 and 74: Location Between 21 degree -45’ t
Page 75 and 76: According to the ranger, U.N.Mahant
Page 77 and 78: Lakhari SanctuaryThe lack of roads
Page 79 and 80: Nandankanan SanctuaryRight outside
Page 81 and 82: Satkosia SanctuarySatkosia Gorge Sa
Page 83 and 84: Issues in Satkosia Wildlife Sanctua
Page 85 and 86: widow pensions etc. Why not we? Are
Page 87 and 88: The importance of forest-based live
Page 89 and 90: discussion, he cited one example of
Page 91 and 92: esiding inside the sanctuary. But a
Page 93 and 94: sanctuary having no human habitatio
Page 95 and 96: Sunabeda SanctuarySunabeda Sanctuar
Page 97 and 98: Issues in Sunabeda Wildlife Sanctua
Page 99 and 100: asked for a copy of final notificat
Page 101 and 102: Amala 10.00 6.00 - 7.00Chhar 20.00
Page 103 and 104: Similipal SanctuarySimilipal is a R
Page 105 and 106: Management ControlUnder the managem
Page 107 and 108: As per the forest department source
Page 109 and 110: Makdia (ST) Siali fibre 100Khadia,
Page 111 and 112: Admitted Rights and ConcessionsItem
Page 113 and 114:
Sunabeda (Proposed) Tiger ReserveSu
Page 115 and 116:
TIGER POPULATION IN DIFFERENT FORES
Page 117 and 118:
Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 5 18 2 25STR Circ
Page 119 and 120:
ELEPHANT RESERVES IN ORISSA119
Page 121 and 122:
Sambalpur ER: BADRAMA-KHALASUNI ER(
Page 123 and 124:
Brahmani-Baitarani (Proposed) ERLoc
Page 125 and 126:
Elephant Distribution in OrissaIn O
Page 127 and 128:
wildlife protection, when the roads
Page 129 and 130:
Broad Issues in Protected Areas in
Page 131 and 132:
communities and particularly for st
Page 133 and 134:
inquiry into the submissions and ac
Page 135 and 136:
In wildlife policies and laws conce
Page 137 and 138:
NTFPs in the total annual household
Page 139 and 140:
people within the protected areas.
Page 141 and 142:
(including those that may be neutra
Page 143 and 144:
Wildlife Administration curtail the
Page 145 and 146:
Number of Sites 3 55 408Total Area
Page 147 and 148:
147
Page 149 and 150:
149
show all

Protected Area Network in Orissa - Vasundhara

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?