12.07.2015 Views

Protected Area Network in Orissa - Vasundhara

Protected Area Network in Orissa - Vasundhara

Protected Area Network in Orissa - Vasundhara

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Issues <strong>in</strong> Sunabeda Wildlife Sanctuary• Confusion Over Legal Status of Sunabeda Wildife Sanctuary:The process of f<strong>in</strong>al notification of Sunabeda Wildlife Sanctuary and <strong>in</strong>clusionof Revenue villages with<strong>in</strong> the boundary of the sanctuary is fraught with<strong>in</strong>herent contradictions. First declaration for constitution of the Sanctuary asper official notification dates back to 26 th July 1983 (vide letterno.16045/FFAH) and the f<strong>in</strong>al notification was issued on 10 th May 1988 (videletter no. 10772/FFAH) as per the note prepared by the then DFO Mr. H.K.Bist.The prevail<strong>in</strong>g law for governance of protected areas says that the collectorshould proceed to determ<strong>in</strong>e, proclaim the boundaries of sanctuary and settlerights of people (with<strong>in</strong> the purview of u/s19-25 of Wildlife Protection Act,1972) before acquisition of revenue land or their <strong>in</strong>clusion with<strong>in</strong> theboundary of Sanctuary. But <strong>in</strong> Sunabeda, the demarcated boundary of thewild life sanctuary area was first declared vide office order no. 5023 dated15.11.97 by the Collector of Nuapada, around n<strong>in</strong>e years after the f<strong>in</strong>alnotification. If the area had been fall<strong>in</strong>g completely with<strong>in</strong> reserve forest thenonly the wild life authorities could have skipped the legal procedure ofsettl<strong>in</strong>g rights of people liv<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong>. As <strong>in</strong> case of reserve forestsdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation of rights u/s19-25 is not required as no private right isexpected to exist there and can be automatically declared as sanctuary u/s 26A. But <strong>in</strong> case of Sunabeda wild life sanctuary, the <strong>in</strong>itiation of settlement ofrights should not have been delayed, as the area doesn’t come under anyreserve forest or territorial water (Letter of the Collector dated17th December,2000, bear<strong>in</strong>g letter no. 5440). Presently there are four Gram Panchayatsnamely Sunabeda, Soseng, Bharuamunda and Kermeli consist<strong>in</strong>g of 30Revenue villages, which are com<strong>in</strong>g under sanctuary area. Apart from theseprocedural contradictions with respect to settlement of rights of peoplestay<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the boundary of the sanctuary, there are many differences97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!