European Infrastructure Finance Yearbook - Investing In Bonds ...
European Infrastructure Finance Yearbook - Investing In Bonds ...
European Infrastructure Finance Yearbook - Investing In Bonds ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UTILITIES<br />
Publication Date:<br />
Nov. 12, 2007<br />
Issuer Credit Rating:<br />
A/Watch Neg/A-1<br />
Primary Credit Analyst:<br />
Ana Nogales,<br />
Madrid,<br />
(34) 91-788-7206<br />
Secondary Credit Analyst:<br />
Peter Kernan,<br />
London,<br />
(44) 20-7176-3618<br />
42 ■ NOVEMBER 2007<br />
ENEL SPA<br />
Rationale<br />
The ratings on Enel SpA remain on CreditWatch<br />
with negative implications, where they were<br />
placed on April 3, 2007, following the company’s<br />
€40 billion joint debt-financed takeover bid with<br />
Spanish construction firm Acciona S.A. for 100%<br />
of Spanish utility Endesa S.A. (A/Watch Neg/A-1).<br />
The continued CreditWatch listing reflects<br />
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services’ expectations<br />
that Enel’s financial profile will further deteriorate<br />
as a result of the tender offer for Endesa. The<br />
offer was completed on Oct. 1, 2007, and Enel<br />
now owns 67% of Endesa. <strong>In</strong> connection with<br />
this acquisition, Enel and Acciona will sell certain<br />
Enel and Endesa assets in Italy, France, Poland,<br />
Turkey, and Spain to German utility E.ON AG<br />
(A/Stable/A-1) in the first half of 2008 for an<br />
expected €13 billion-<br />
€14 billion.<br />
We expect to resolve the CreditWatch status<br />
once details about Enel’s business strategy and<br />
capital structure are available.<br />
The current ratings reflect Enel’s significant<br />
position in the Italian power market, which is<br />
sustained by its vertically integrated operations.<br />
The acquisition of Endesa should enhance Enel’s<br />
business profile, through increased size and<br />
diversification. <strong>In</strong> addition, operating synergies<br />
could be material. Enel’s ability to reap the<br />
potential benefits, however, will depend on its<br />
degree of control of Endesa and the functioning<br />
of its partnership with Acciona. Although the<br />
transaction will enhance Enel’s business profile, it<br />
will lead to a material deterioration in the<br />
company’s financial position, notwithstanding the<br />
benefit of the asset sales to E.ON. Enel’s debtfinanced<br />
investment in Endesa totals about<br />
€28 billion (equity value). This compares with<br />
net reported debt of €24.8 billion at Sept. 30,<br />
2007, which already included the debt financing<br />
of a 25% Endesa stake.<br />
STANDARD & POOR’S EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE YEARBOOK<br />
Enel’s acquisition earlier this year of about<br />
€1.8 billion in Russian assets and its desire to<br />
become an integrated energy player in the Russian<br />
market will also weigh negatively on the<br />
company’s credit quality, due to country and<br />
industry risks, as well as to the financial impact.<br />
The company’s public announcement that it has<br />
now almost completed its M&A activity and that<br />
it will focus on integrating all of its international<br />
assets somewhat reduces acquisition-related risks.<br />
Short-term credit factors<br />
Enel’s short-term rating is ‘A-1’. At Sept. 30,<br />
2007, the company had committed credit lines of<br />
€5 billion, of which €2 billion had been drawn,<br />
and uncommitted credit lines of €2.6 billion, of<br />
which €0.9 billion had been drawn. The finance<br />
documentation for these facilities does not include<br />
material covenants. <strong>In</strong> addition, Enel had a €35<br />
billion committed credit line to fully finance the<br />
Endesa acquisition, which has now been reduced<br />
to €23 billion after the June and September bond<br />
issues and the results of the Endesa tender offer.<br />
This credit line is split into three tranches with<br />
different maturities: 1) one year, subject to a termout<br />
option for a further 18 months, for a residual<br />
amount of €2.5 billion; 2) three years, for a<br />
residual amount of €12.3 billion; and 3) five<br />
years, for a residual amount of €8.2 billion.<br />
Consequently, short-term refinancing risk seems<br />
modest. Given Enel’s size and market position,<br />
and the successful placement of its $3.5 billion<br />
bond issued in the U.S., access to the capital<br />
markets and the ability to issue debt of an<br />
appropriate tenor are not credit concerns, even<br />
under current market conditions. Enel’s ultimate<br />
debt profile, in terms of maturity and<br />
composition, will depend upon the permanent<br />
financing that it arranges to replace the<br />
acquisition facility. ■