12.07.2015 Views

Annual Report 2007-08 - the Parliamentary and Health Service ...

Annual Report 2007-08 - the Parliamentary and Health Service ...

Annual Report 2007-08 - the Parliamentary and Health Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Parliamentary</strong> <strong>and</strong> health service ombudsman annual report <strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong>9Case StudyFailure to refer widower forbereavement interview preventedbenefit claimMr P’s wife passed away suddenly in November 2003. Hisdaughter (Mrs Q), who had also been Mrs P’s carer, telephonedher local Jobcentre Plus office to report <strong>the</strong> death, <strong>and</strong> to askif her fa<strong>the</strong>r was entitled to any help with funeral costs. Shewas put through to <strong>the</strong> social fund team who told her, correctly,that her fa<strong>the</strong>r was not entitled to a funeral payment from <strong>the</strong>social fund. She accepted what she was told <strong>and</strong> made nofur<strong>the</strong>r enquiries. Some 18 months later Mr P was told by arecently bereaved friend that he could have been eligible fora bereavement payment (but by <strong>the</strong>n he was out of time tomake a claim).Mr P asked Jobcentre Plus to review his case. It interviewedhim <strong>and</strong> Mrs Q about <strong>the</strong> advice <strong>the</strong>y had been given in 2003,but refused his request for a special payment. Mr P <strong>the</strong>ncomplained to <strong>the</strong> Ombudsman; he said he had found it difficultto cope financially following <strong>the</strong> death of his wife, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lackof a bereavement payment had added to his distress <strong>and</strong>caused him avoidable inconvenience.We upheld <strong>the</strong> complaint. Although <strong>the</strong> social fund officer’sresponse was correct, it was maladministration not to havesignposted Mrs Q to <strong>the</strong> bereavement benefit team, whocould have told her about a bereavement payment. We alsofound that Jobcentre Plus was maladministrative in not actingon <strong>the</strong> notification of death <strong>and</strong> not offering Mr P abereavement interview, which was normal practice. Weconcluded that <strong>the</strong> guidance according to which <strong>the</strong> officerswere operating restricted <strong>the</strong>ir ability to provide a joined-upservice to customers, <strong>and</strong> had led to injustice for Mr P.We recommended that Jobcentre Plus apologise to Mr P,award him an extra-statutory payment of £2,000 in respectof <strong>the</strong> bereavement payment plus interest (£293.28) <strong>and</strong> aconsolatory payment of £200. Jobcentre Plus agreed to do so.During <strong>the</strong> course of our investigation, Jobcentre Plus revisedits guidance so that <strong>the</strong> relevant sections on funeral paymentsfrom <strong>the</strong> social fund <strong>and</strong> bereavement payments cross-referenceeach o<strong>the</strong>r.23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!