12.07.2015 Views

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence Contents

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence Contents

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence Contents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN WEB INTELLIGENCE, VOL. 2, NO. 2, MAY 2010transmission distance is significantly greater than theelectronic ones, signal need not to be regenerated <strong>in</strong>optical networks. Optical fiber has very less weight <strong>in</strong>comparison to electronic MINs. Thus Optical networksgive the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> high bandwidth and low latency.TABLE IICOMARISON OF ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL NETWORKSCharacteristicsElectronicMultistageNetwotksOpticalMultistageNetworksSpeed Less HighEnergyElectricity LightTransmittedBandwidth Used for lessbandwidthapplicationsUsed for highbandwidthapplicationsLatency High LessError Probability High LessWeight More LessCost Less MoreSwitch<strong>in</strong>g Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g CircuitSwitch<strong>in</strong>gPathProvide Multi path Provide s<strong>in</strong>glefrom source to path fromdest<strong>in</strong>ation. source todest<strong>in</strong>ationComplexity More Complex Less ComplexStructureconsidered2-dimensional 3-dimensionalIV. PROBLEMS IN OPTICAL NETWORKSDue to the difference <strong>in</strong> speeds <strong>of</strong> the electronic andoptical switch<strong>in</strong>g elements and the nature <strong>of</strong> opticalsignals, optical MINs also hold their own challenges.A. Path Dependent LossPath dependent loss means that optical signalsbecome weak after pass<strong>in</strong>g through an optical path. In alarge MIN, a big part <strong>of</strong> the path-dependent loss isdirectly proportional to the number <strong>of</strong> couplers that theoptical path passes through [16]. Hence, it depends on thearchitecture used and its network size. Hence, if theoptical signal has to pass through more no <strong>of</strong> stages orswitches the path dependent loss will be more.B. Optical CrosstalkOptical crosstalk occurs when two signal channels<strong>in</strong>teract with each other. There are two ways <strong>in</strong> whichoptical paths can <strong>in</strong>teract <strong>in</strong> a switch<strong>in</strong>g network. Thechannels carry<strong>in</strong>g the signals could cross each other.Alternatively; two paths shar<strong>in</strong>g a switch couldexperience some undesired coupl<strong>in</strong>g from one path toanother with<strong>in</strong> a switch. For example, assume that thetwo <strong>in</strong>puts are y and z, respectively, the two outputs willhave ly+lxz and lz+lxy, respectively, where l is path lossand x is signal crosstalk <strong>in</strong> a switch. Us<strong>in</strong>g the best devicex=35 dB and l=0.25 dB. For more practically availabledevices, it is more likely that x=20 dB and l=1 dB [5].Hence, when a signal passes many switches, the <strong>in</strong>putsignal will be distorted at the output due to the loss andcrosstalk <strong>in</strong>troduced on the path.Crosstalk problem is more dangerous than the pathdependentloss problem with current optical technology.Thus, switch crosstalk is the most significant factor thatreduces the signal-to-noise ratio and limits the size <strong>of</strong> anetwork. Luckily, ensur<strong>in</strong>g that a switch is not used bytwo <strong>in</strong>put signals simultaneously can elim<strong>in</strong>ate first-ordercrosstalk. Once the major source <strong>of</strong> crosstalk disappears,crosstalk <strong>in</strong> an optical MIN will have a very small effecton the signal-to-noise ratio and thus a large optical MINcan be built and effectively used <strong>in</strong> parallel comput<strong>in</strong>gsystems.V. APPROACHES TO SOLVE CROSSTALKA. Space Doma<strong>in</strong> ApproachOne way to solve crosstalk problem is a spacedoma<strong>in</strong> approach, where a MIN is duplicated andcomb<strong>in</strong>ed to avoid crosstalk [8]. The number <strong>of</strong> switchesrequired for the same connectivity <strong>in</strong> networks with spacedoma<strong>in</strong> approach is slightly larger than twice that for theregular network. This approach uses more than doublethe orig<strong>in</strong>al network hardware to achieve the same. Thusfor the same permutation the hardware or we can say theno <strong>of</strong> switches will be double. Thus cost will be morewith the networks us<strong>in</strong>g space doma<strong>in</strong> approach. In allthe four cases only one <strong>in</strong>put and only one output isactive at a given time so that no cross talk occurs. Withthe space doma<strong>in</strong> approach, extra switch<strong>in</strong>g elements(SEs) and l<strong>in</strong>ks are used to ensure that at most one <strong>in</strong>putand one output <strong>of</strong> every SE will be used at any giventime.Figure 3. Crosstalk avoidance us<strong>in</strong>g space doma<strong>in</strong> approachB. Time Doma<strong>in</strong> ApproachAnother way to solve the problem <strong>of</strong> crosstalk is thetime doma<strong>in</strong> approach [3]. With the time doma<strong>in</strong>approach, the same objective is achieved by treat<strong>in</strong>gcrosstalk as a conflict; that is, two connections will beestablished at different times if they use the same SE.Whereas we want to distribute the messages to be sent tothe network <strong>in</strong>to several groups, a method is used to f<strong>in</strong>d© 2010 ACADEMY PUBLISHER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!