Huston, M.A. (1994). Biological Diversity – the coexistence <strong>of</strong> species on changing landscapes,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Huszar, P.C. (1989). “Economics <strong>of</strong> Reducing Off-Site Costs <strong>of</strong> Wind Erosion”, Land Economics,65(4), pp. 333-340.ICN-Instituto de Conservação da Natureza (1993). “Livro vermelho dos vertebrados em Portugal”,Secretatia de Estado do Ambiente e Consumidor, ICN, Lisboa, Portugal.IUCN (1991). “United Nation Environmental Program and World Wide Fund for Nature, Caring forthe Earth”, International Union <strong>of</strong> Nature Conservation, Gland.IUCN (1993). Draft IUCN Red List Categories, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.IUCN (2000). IUCN Internet Page, http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/redlists/categor.htmJohnansson, P-O. (1989). “Valuing Public Goods in a Risky World: an Experiment”, in Folmer, H.and E. Ierland (eds) Evaluation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental Economics,Amsterdam, North Holland.King, D.A. and J.A. Sinden (1988). “Influence <strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation on Farm Land Values”,Ecological Economics, 64(3), pp. 242-255.Lacy, R.C. (1993). “VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis”,Wildlife Research, 20, pp. 45-65.Lacy, R.C and T.W. Clark (1990). “Population viability assessment <strong>of</strong> eastern barred bandicoot, inT.W. Clark and J.H. Seebeck (eds) Management and Conservation <strong>of</strong> Small Populations,Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL.Levin, S.A. (1998). “Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems”, Ecosystems,1(5), pp. 431-436.Levin, S.A., Greenfell, B., Hastings, A. and A. Perelson (1997). “Mathematical and ComputationalChallenges in Population Biology and Ecosystem Science”, Science, 275, pp. 334-343.Lindenmayer, D.B., Lacy, R.C., Thomas, V.C. and T.W. Clark (1993). “Predictions <strong>of</strong> the impacts <strong>of</strong>changes in population size and environmental variability on Leadbeater’s possum usingpopulation viability analysis”, Wildlife Research, 20, pp. 67-86.Lockwood, M. (1999). “Humans Valuing Nature: Synthesising Insights from Philosophy, Psychologyand Economics”, Environment Values, 8, pp. 381-401.Loomis, J.B. and D.M. Larson (1994). “Total economic value <strong>of</strong> increasing Gray Whale populations:results from a contingent valuation survey <strong>of</strong> visitors and households”, Marine ResourceEconomics, 9, pp. 275-286.Mace, G. M. et al. (1992). “The development <strong>of</strong> new criteria for listing species on the IUCN RedList” Species, 19, pp. 16-22.Mace, G. M., and R. Lande. (1991). “Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation <strong>of</strong> IUCNthreatened species categories”, Conservation Biology, 5(2), pp. 148-57.179
Mace, G. M. & S. N. Stuart. (1994). “Draft IUCN Red List Categories, Version 2.2”, Species, 21-22,pp. 13-24.Moons, E. (1999). “Estimation <strong>of</strong> the recreation values <strong>of</strong> a forest”, M.Sc. dissertation, Faculty <strong>of</strong>Economics and Applied Economics, Catholic University <strong>of</strong> Leuven.NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (1993). “Report <strong>of</strong> the NOAA Panel onContingent <strong>Valuation</strong>”, Federal Register, 58(10), pp. 4601-4614, US.Norberg, J. (1999). “Linking Nature´s Services to Ecosystems: Some General Ecological Concepts”,Ecological Economics, 29, pp. 183-202.Norton, B. G. (1982). “Environmental Ethics and Nonhuman Rights”, Environmental Ethics, 4,17-36.Norton, G. M. and C. Southey (1995). “The opportunity costs <strong>of</strong> biodiversity protection in Kenya”,Ecological Economics, 11, pp. 135-151.Norton and Ulanowicz (1992). “Scale and <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Policy: A Hierarchical Approach”, Ambio,21(3), pp. 244-249.Noss, R.F. (1983). “A Regional Landscape Approach to Maintain Diversity”, BioScience, 33, pp.700-706.Nunes, P.A. (2000). “Contingent <strong>Valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> Natural Areas and its warm glowcomponent”, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Applied Economics, CatholicUniversity <strong>of</strong> Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Nunes, P.A. (2001). “Using Factor Analysis to Identify Consumer Preferences for the Protection <strong>of</strong> aNatural Area: evidence from a <strong>Valuation</strong> Survey in Portugal”, forthcoming, European Journal<strong>of</strong> Operational Research.Nunes, P.A. and van den Bergh, C. J. M. (2000). “Economic analysis and valuation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity: acritical review”, out for review, Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecological Economics.Nunes, P.A. and van den Bergh, C. J. M. and P/ Nijkamp (2000). “<strong>Biodiversity</strong>: ecological-economicanalysis and valuation”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Series, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Odum, E.P. (1971). “The Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Ecology”, Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, US.Palmquist, R. B. (1991). “Hedonic Methods”, in Braden, J. B. and C. D. Kolstad (eds) “Measuringthe Demand for Environment Quality”, Chapter IV, Elsevier Science Publishers,North-Holland.Pearce, D. (1999). “Valuing biological diversity: issues and overview”, draft paper presented at<strong>OECD</strong> Workshop on Benefit <strong>Valuation</strong> for <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Resources, Paris, France.Pearce, D. and D. Moran (1994). “The Economic Value <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong>”, Earthscan PublicationsLimited, London, UK.180
- Page 1 and 2:
«ENVIRONMENTValuation ofBiodiversi
- Page 3 and 4:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPART 1 ...........
- Page 7 and 8:
PART 4 ............................
- Page 10 and 11:
Why value biodiversity?There are th
- Page 12 and 13:
Figure 1.1 Total economic value: us
- Page 14 and 15:
from biodiversity at the local leve
- Page 16 and 17:
in the database and also for undert
- Page 18 and 19:
in the policy context. This is high
- Page 20:
Table 1.3 Policy Options for the Cl
- Page 23 and 24:
Box 1.2 Value of Turkey’s Forests
- Page 25 and 26:
of the most important implications
- Page 27 and 28:
Additionally, valuation does not ju
- Page 29 and 30:
value is the habitat, many differen
- Page 31 and 32:
are very modest. More recently, new
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.2 Estimates of the Medicina
- Page 35 and 36:
The importance of indirect use valu
- Page 37 and 38:
pharmaceutical use, although the li
- Page 39 and 40:
McAllister, D., (1991). Estimating
- Page 41 and 42:
Simpson, D and Craft, A.. (1996).
- Page 43 and 44:
practice, the overlap between these
- Page 45 and 46:
aimed at giving more precise quanti
- Page 47 and 48:
structural values. There are a numb
- Page 49 and 50:
Reid (forthcoming) discusses the po
- Page 51 and 52:
Ecotourism as a Way to Generate Loc
- Page 53 and 54:
endangered Indian rhino and other t
- Page 55 and 56:
ReferencesBann, C., and M. Clemens
- Page 57 and 58:
PART 261
- Page 59 and 60:
many European countries, CBA has a
- Page 61 and 62:
(1) Cost and time constraintsThe co
- Page 63 and 64:
activity day, there is greater vari
- Page 65 and 66:
added independent variable C s= cha
- Page 67 and 68:
error in valuing respiratory sympto
- Page 69 and 70:
ReferencesArrow, K.J., R. Solow, E.
- Page 71 and 72:
OECD (1995). The Economic Appraisal
- Page 73 and 74:
CHAPTER 5:by José Manuel LIMA E SA
- Page 75 and 76:
linkages usually lead to diverse co
- Page 77 and 78:
A discrete choice approach to quest
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 5.2 Model-based point estimat
- Page 81 and 82:
is potentially very large for multi
- Page 83 and 84:
P3 is already in the mix is 2.51, s
- Page 85 and 86:
PART 391
- Page 87 and 88:
measures of value. An appendix to t
- Page 89 and 90:
features (such as parks, beaches or
- Page 91 and 92:
included in cost-benefit analysis o
- Page 93 and 94:
A Discussion of Past Efforts to Dev
- Page 95 and 96:
Satellite AccountsIn addition to th
- Page 97 and 98:
which many people argue are associa
- Page 99 and 100:
approach to competing uses of water
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 6.2 Trade-Off AnalysisEnviro
- Page 103 and 104:
However, the farmers need not bear
- Page 105 and 106:
Appendix 1: Theory and Application
- Page 107 and 108:
iwhere C is the income adjustment n
- Page 109 and 110:
complete. If there are more than on
- Page 111 and 112:
Horowitz, Joel. L. and Jordan. J. L
- Page 113 and 114:
CHAPTER 7:by Dennis M. KING and Lis
- Page 115 and 116:
Box 7.1 Definition of terms related
- Page 117 and 118:
Box 7.2 Categories of Ecosystem Ser
- Page 119 and 120: Box 7.4 Dollar-based ecosystem valu
- Page 121 and 122: Non-monetary indicators of ecosyste
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 7.1 Effects of Wetland Locat
- Page 125 and 126: description, and that the usefulnes
- Page 127 and 128: 2) Service capacity sub-indexIndica
- Page 129 and 130: wetlands, for example, results in F
- Page 131 and 132: (1) Functional CapacityIndexFigure
- Page 133 and 134: constituents of runoff can be predi
- Page 135 and 136: Service(on or off site)Recreational
- Page 137 and 138: Table 7.3 Service Risk Sub-index De
- Page 139 and 140: Measuring Service Preference Weight
- Page 141 and 142: Table 7.4 Illustration of Paired Co
- Page 143 and 144: PART 4151
- Page 145 and 146: Ecological foundations for biodiver
- Page 147 and 148: Phenotic diversity is a measure bas
- Page 149 and 150: Operationalisation of the biotic-ri
- Page 151 and 152: ten attributes that could score a m
- Page 153 and 154: The choice of the scale relates to
- Page 155 and 156: Nature measurement methodIn 1995, t
- Page 157 and 158: Table 8.4 Value orientations and en
- Page 159 and 160: Table 8.5 Identification of monetar
- Page 161 and 162: Table 8.6 Valuation studiesSingle s
- Page 163 and 164: in waterway systems for nine impact
- Page 165 and 166: to other contexts, conditions, loca
- Page 167 and 168: ReferencesAkcakaya, H.R. (1994).
- Page 169: de Groot, R.S. (1994). “Environme
- Page 173 and 174: Turner, R.K., Perrings, C. and Folk
- Page 175 and 176: John A. DixonJohn A. Dixon is Lead
- Page 177 and 178: Robert O’NeillDr. O’Neill recei
- Page 179 and 180: Steven StewartSteven Stewart is Ass
- Page 181: OECD PUBLICATIONS, 2, rue André-Pa