Perrings, C. (1998). “Resilience in the dynamics <strong>of</strong> economic-environment systems”, Environmentaland Resource Economics: Special Issue, 11, pp. 503-520.Perrings, C., K-G. Maler, C. Folke, C.S. Holling and B-O. Jansson (eds) (1995). “<strong>Biodiversity</strong> Loss:Economic and Ecological Issues”, Cambridge University Press.Randwell, D.S. (1969). pers. comm. cited in Ratcliffe, D.A. (1986). “Selection <strong>of</strong> important areas forwildlife conservation in Great Britain: the Nature Conservancy Council’s Approach, in M.B.Usher (ed.), Wildlife Conservation Evaluation, Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Rapport, D., Costanza,R., Epstein, P.R., Gaudet, C. and R. Levins (1998). “Ecosystem Health”,Blackwell Science, UK.Ribaudo, M.O. (1989). “Targeting the Conservation Reserve Program to Maximize Water Quality<strong>Benefits</strong>”, Land Economics, 65(4), pp. 320-332.Richer, J. (1995). “ Willingness to Pay for Desert Protection”, Contemporary Economic Policy, XIII,pp. 93-104.RIZA (1999). “Uitganspunten voor een Graadmeteer Natuur-waarde voor Nederland: het EcologischKapitaal Index concept, definitiestudie in opdracht van het Natuurplanbureau”, unpublished.Ruijgrok, E. (1999). “<strong>Valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Nature in Coastal Zones”, Ph.D. dissertation, Free University <strong>of</strong>Amsterdam.Sag<strong>of</strong>f, M. (1980). “On the Preservation <strong>of</strong> Species”, Columbia Journal <strong>of</strong> Environmental Law, 7, pp.33-67.Samples, K. and J. Hollyer (1989). “Contingent <strong>Valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Resources in the Presence <strong>of</strong>Substitutes and Complement”, in Johnson, R. and G. Johnson (eds) “Economic <strong>Valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong>Natural Resources: Issues, Theory and Application”, Boulder, CO.Sijtsma, F.J.and D. Strijker (1995). “Effect analyse ecologische hoodstructuur; Deel II: Natuurwaarde,Stiching Ruimtelijke Economie Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.Sijtsma, F.J., Strijker, D. and M.L. Hoefsloot (1998). “Duurzame Ontwikkeling in hetWaddengebied”, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.Silberman, J., Gerlowski, D.A. and N.A. Williams (1992). “Estimating Existence Value for Users andNonusers <strong>of</strong> New Jersey Beaches” , Land Economics, 68(2), pp. 225-236.Soulé, M.E. (ed) (1987). Viable Population for Conservation, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, UK.Spellerberg, I.F. (1992). Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation, Chapman & Hall, London,UK.Turner, R.K., Folke, C., Gren I.M. and I.J. Batemann (1995). “Wetland <strong>Valuation</strong>: Three CaseStudies”, in Perrings C., Mäler, K-G., Folke, C., Holling, C.S. and B-O. Jansson (eds),<strong>Biodiversity</strong> Loss: Economic and Ecological Issues, Cambridge University Press.181
Turner, R.K., Perrings, C. and Folke, C. (1997). Ecological Economics: Paradigm or Perspective? inJ. Van den Bergh and J. Van der Straaten (eds.) Economy and Ecosystems in Change, EdwardElgar Publishers, Cheltenham.Turner, R.K., K. Button and P. Nijkamp (eds) (1999). “Ecosystems and Nature: Economics, Scienceand Policy”, Elgar.Ulanowicz, R.E. (1992). “Ecosystem Health and Tropic Flows Networks” in Costanza, R., Norton, B.and B. Haskell (eds), Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management, IslandPress, Washington, US.UNEP (1995). “Global <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Assessment” report by Watson, R.T., Heywood, V.H., Baste, I.,Dias, B., Gamez, R. and W. Reid, United Nations Environment Program, US.UNEP (1997). “Recommendations for a Core Set <strong>of</strong> Indicators <strong>of</strong> Biological Diversity”, Conventionon Biological Diversity, Montreal, United Nations Environment Program, US.Usher, M.B. (1989). “Nature Conservation in UK”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology, 26, pp. 813-824.van den Bergh and P. Nijkamp (1991). “Aggregate economic-ecological models for sustainabledevelopment”, Environment and Planning, 23: pp. 187-206.van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten (eds) (1997). Economy and Ecosystems in Change, EdwardElgar Publishers, Cheltenham.van der Veer D. and C. Pierce (1986). “People, Penguins and Plastic Trees: Basic Issues inEnvironmental Ethics” Wadsworth, Belmont, US.van Kooten, G.C. (1993). “Bioeconomic Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Government Agricultural Programs onWetland Conservation”, Land Economics, 69(1), pp. 27-38.Ward, R., Skibinski, D. and M. Woodmark (1992). “Protein heterozygosity, protein structure, andtoxonomic differentiation”, Evolutionary Biology, 26, pp.73-159.Whittaker, R.H. (1960). “Vegetation <strong>of</strong> the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California”, EcologicalMonographs, 30, pp. 279-338.Whittaker, R.H. (1972). “Evolution and Measurement <strong>of</strong> Species Diversity”, Taxon, 21, pp. 1-67.Williams, P.H., Vane-Wright, R.I. and RI Humphries (1991). “Measuring <strong>Biodiversity</strong> for ChoosingConservation Areas” in LaSalle (ed) Hymenoptera and <strong>Biodiversity</strong>, CAB International.WTO (1997). Statistical Year Book <strong>of</strong> Tourism, World Tourism Organisation, Madrid.Zhou, Z. and W. Pan (1997). “Analysis <strong>of</strong> the viability if a giant panda population”, Journal <strong>of</strong>Applied Ecology, 34, pp. 363-374.Zurlini, G., Amadio, G. and O. Rossi (2000). “A Landscape Approach to <strong>Biodiversity</strong> and BiologicalPlanning: the Map <strong>of</strong> Italian Nature, Ecosystem Health, 5(4), pp. 294-311.182
- Page 1 and 2:
«ENVIRONMENTValuation ofBiodiversi
- Page 3 and 4:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPART 1 ...........
- Page 7 and 8:
PART 4 ............................
- Page 10 and 11:
Why value biodiversity?There are th
- Page 12 and 13:
Figure 1.1 Total economic value: us
- Page 14 and 15:
from biodiversity at the local leve
- Page 16 and 17:
in the database and also for undert
- Page 18 and 19:
in the policy context. This is high
- Page 20:
Table 1.3 Policy Options for the Cl
- Page 23 and 24:
Box 1.2 Value of Turkey’s Forests
- Page 25 and 26:
of the most important implications
- Page 27 and 28:
Additionally, valuation does not ju
- Page 29 and 30:
value is the habitat, many differen
- Page 31 and 32:
are very modest. More recently, new
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.2 Estimates of the Medicina
- Page 35 and 36:
The importance of indirect use valu
- Page 37 and 38:
pharmaceutical use, although the li
- Page 39 and 40:
McAllister, D., (1991). Estimating
- Page 41 and 42:
Simpson, D and Craft, A.. (1996).
- Page 43 and 44:
practice, the overlap between these
- Page 45 and 46:
aimed at giving more precise quanti
- Page 47 and 48:
structural values. There are a numb
- Page 49 and 50:
Reid (forthcoming) discusses the po
- Page 51 and 52:
Ecotourism as a Way to Generate Loc
- Page 53 and 54:
endangered Indian rhino and other t
- Page 55 and 56:
ReferencesBann, C., and M. Clemens
- Page 57 and 58:
PART 261
- Page 59 and 60:
many European countries, CBA has a
- Page 61 and 62:
(1) Cost and time constraintsThe co
- Page 63 and 64:
activity day, there is greater vari
- Page 65 and 66:
added independent variable C s= cha
- Page 67 and 68:
error in valuing respiratory sympto
- Page 69 and 70:
ReferencesArrow, K.J., R. Solow, E.
- Page 71 and 72:
OECD (1995). The Economic Appraisal
- Page 73 and 74:
CHAPTER 5:by José Manuel LIMA E SA
- Page 75 and 76:
linkages usually lead to diverse co
- Page 77 and 78:
A discrete choice approach to quest
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 5.2 Model-based point estimat
- Page 81 and 82:
is potentially very large for multi
- Page 83 and 84:
P3 is already in the mix is 2.51, s
- Page 85 and 86:
PART 391
- Page 87 and 88:
measures of value. An appendix to t
- Page 89 and 90:
features (such as parks, beaches or
- Page 91 and 92:
included in cost-benefit analysis o
- Page 93 and 94:
A Discussion of Past Efforts to Dev
- Page 95 and 96:
Satellite AccountsIn addition to th
- Page 97 and 98:
which many people argue are associa
- Page 99 and 100:
approach to competing uses of water
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 6.2 Trade-Off AnalysisEnviro
- Page 103 and 104:
However, the farmers need not bear
- Page 105 and 106:
Appendix 1: Theory and Application
- Page 107 and 108:
iwhere C is the income adjustment n
- Page 109 and 110:
complete. If there are more than on
- Page 111 and 112:
Horowitz, Joel. L. and Jordan. J. L
- Page 113 and 114:
CHAPTER 7:by Dennis M. KING and Lis
- Page 115 and 116:
Box 7.1 Definition of terms related
- Page 117 and 118:
Box 7.2 Categories of Ecosystem Ser
- Page 119 and 120:
Box 7.4 Dollar-based ecosystem valu
- Page 121 and 122: Non-monetary indicators of ecosyste
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 7.1 Effects of Wetland Locat
- Page 125 and 126: description, and that the usefulnes
- Page 127 and 128: 2) Service capacity sub-indexIndica
- Page 129 and 130: wetlands, for example, results in F
- Page 131 and 132: (1) Functional CapacityIndexFigure
- Page 133 and 134: constituents of runoff can be predi
- Page 135 and 136: Service(on or off site)Recreational
- Page 137 and 138: Table 7.3 Service Risk Sub-index De
- Page 139 and 140: Measuring Service Preference Weight
- Page 141 and 142: Table 7.4 Illustration of Paired Co
- Page 143 and 144: PART 4151
- Page 145 and 146: Ecological foundations for biodiver
- Page 147 and 148: Phenotic diversity is a measure bas
- Page 149 and 150: Operationalisation of the biotic-ri
- Page 151 and 152: ten attributes that could score a m
- Page 153 and 154: The choice of the scale relates to
- Page 155 and 156: Nature measurement methodIn 1995, t
- Page 157 and 158: Table 8.4 Value orientations and en
- Page 159 and 160: Table 8.5 Identification of monetar
- Page 161 and 162: Table 8.6 Valuation studiesSingle s
- Page 163 and 164: in waterway systems for nine impact
- Page 165 and 166: to other contexts, conditions, loca
- Page 167 and 168: ReferencesAkcakaya, H.R. (1994).
- Page 169 and 170: de Groot, R.S. (1994). “Environme
- Page 171: Mace, G. M. & S. N. Stuart. (1994).
- Page 175 and 176: John A. DixonJohn A. Dixon is Lead
- Page 177 and 178: Robert O’NeillDr. O’Neill recei
- Page 179 and 180: Steven StewartSteven Stewart is Ass
- Page 181: OECD PUBLICATIONS, 2, rue André-Pa