- Page 1 and 2: «ENVIRONMENTValuation ofBiodiversi
- Page 3 and 4: ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSPART 1 ...........
- Page 7: PART 4 ............................
- Page 11 and 12: these are the most endangered crane
- Page 13 and 14: Valuation is only the first step. A
- Page 15 and 16: - to determine the environmental ex
- Page 17 and 18: Benefit Transfer and Contingent Val
- Page 19 and 20: Conjoint analysisKahn et al. (Chapt
- Page 22 and 23: The above ecosystem value indicator
- Page 24 and 25: CHAPTER 2:by David PEARCE 4VALUING
- Page 26 and 27: with the highest (net) economic val
- Page 28 and 29: depreciation on other assets, inclu
- Page 30 and 31: suggests that an 8% wild germplasm
- Page 32 and 33: - Valuation procedures vary not onl
- Page 34 and 35: What then is the economic value of
- Page 36 and 37: cost-benefit studies. Finally, the
- Page 38 and 39: ReferencesAnderson, J. and Hazell,
- Page 40 and 41: Pearce, D.W, Krug, W and Moran, D.
- Page 42 and 43: CHAPTER 3:by John A. DIXON and Stef
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 3.2 Total Economic Value and
- Page 46 and 47: ‘quasi-option value’, which ari
- Page 48 and 49: Paying for Environmental ServicesCo
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 3.4 Using GEF grants to Incr
- Page 52 and 53: such as the Masai Mara cannot be da
- Page 54 and 55: 3. Identify and attempt to capture
- Page 56 and 57: Kramer, R.A., M. Munasinghe, N. Sha
- Page 58 and 59:
CHAPTER 4:by Ståle NAVRUDCOMPARING
- Page 60 and 61:
original studies. Section 4 conclud
- Page 62 and 63:
(5) Political constraintsPolitician
- Page 64 and 65:
Function transferBenefit Function T
- Page 66 and 67:
population instead of income data f
- Page 68 and 69:
captured in this database is steadi
- Page 70 and 71:
GARP II (1999). Final report of the
- Page 72 and 73:
Walsh, R.G., D.M. Johnson and J.R.
- Page 74 and 75:
The valuable services of living res
- Page 76 and 77:
pay US$ 10 for wood B with no conse
- Page 78 and 79:
(1) the strongest substitutes are m
- Page 80 and 81:
Implications for non-market valuati
- Page 82 and 83:
present the same benefit estimates,
- Page 84 and 85:
ReferencesArrow, K.; R. Solow; E. L
- Page 86 and 87:
CHAPTER 6:by James R. KAHN 13 , Rob
- Page 88 and 89:
is important to break them out into
- Page 90 and 91:
- A group of non-profit organisatio
- Page 92 and 93:
Figure 6.1 Selected Determinants of
- Page 94 and 95:
flawed measure of NDP. If increasin
- Page 96 and 97:
defining weights that is consistent
- Page 98 and 99:
Use of the Trade-off Weighted Index
- Page 100 and 101:
Option A Option B Option C: Status
- Page 102 and 103:
equitable approach in that if all s
- Page 104 and 105:
analysis has the potential to avoid
- Page 106 and 107:
changes - varying the level of the
- Page 108 and 109:
desirable. Closely related to ranki
- Page 110 and 111:
ReferencesAdamowicz, W., J. J. Louv
- Page 112 and 113:
Moffat, I. and M.D. Wilson (1994).
- Page 114 and 115:
provides the correct context for de
- Page 116 and 117:
“willingness-to-pay” for birdin
- Page 118 and 119:
“willingness to pay” surveys; a
- Page 120 and 121:
Box 7.5 Risks of using dollar-based
- Page 122 and 123:
· Site A is downslope of agricultu
- Page 124 and 125:
Developing ecosystem value indicesT
- Page 126 and 127:
- Cost of service access - time and
- Page 128 and 129:
average in every way, for example,
- Page 130 and 131:
Figure 7.3 Illustration of indicato
- Page 132 and 133:
Service Capacity Sub-index: Connect
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 7.1 Service Capacity Sub-inde
- Page 136 and 137:
arise from natural processes alone
- Page 138 and 139:
protected. Table 7.3 provides some
- Page 140 and 141:
espondents selected from population
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 7.5 Example Checklist of Regi
- Page 144 and 145:
CHAPTER 8:by Paulo A.L.D. NUNES, Je
- Page 146 and 147:
More recently, Norberg (1999) propo
- Page 148 and 149:
area, where areas containing a high
- Page 150 and 151:
Several problems however exist, ren
- Page 152 and 153:
important this is for the functioni
- Page 154 and 155:
Table 8.3 Indices of vigour, organi
- Page 156 and 157:
Economic foundations for biodiversi
- Page 158 and 159:
Figure 8.3 Economic values of biodi
- Page 160 and 161:
Empirical valuation studiesThis sec
- Page 162 and 163:
Diversity at the ecosystem levelThe
- Page 164 and 165:
characterised by simple theoretical
- Page 166 and 167:
conservation values. This approach
- Page 168 and 169:
Boon, P.J., Holmes, N.T, Maitland,
- Page 170 and 171:
Huston, M.A. (1994). Biological Div
- Page 172 and 173:
Perrings, C. (1998). “Resilience
- Page 174 and 175:
BIOGRAPHIESRosalind BarkRosalind wa
- Page 176 and 177:
Dennis KingDennis King earned his P
- Page 178 and 179:
consortium involving the participat
- Page 180 and 181:
Economists (June 1998). He is edito