12.07.2015 Views

Abstracts - Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

Abstracts - Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

Abstracts - Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MARTA FILIPE ALEXANDRE, UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA, ILTEC, PORTUGALEVALUATING THE DIFFERENCES, AND REPRESENTING THE SIMILARITIES - HOW DOPORTUGUESE SCIENTISTS CLASSIFY THEIR SCIENTIFIC AREAS?This paper proposes a linguistic analysis on the representation of scientific domainsby twenty-four Portuguese scientists. More specifically, the paper focuses on theanswers to the question “How would you classify your science?” given in thecontext of an individual interview regarding both the nature of science and thepractice of being a scientist in Portugal.The analysis is framed by systemic-functional linguistics (Halli<strong>da</strong>y, 2004; Gouveia,2009), and uses transitivity and appraisal categories to scrutinize differences inrepresentation and classification. Following work <strong>de</strong>veloped in critical discourseanalysis (Fairclough, 2003), these differences will be related with particular ways ofthinking and acting within the scientific community.Preliminary analytical results indicate that the interviewees represent scientificdomains essentially as spatial references and assume both the point of view ofsomeone insi<strong>de</strong> and outsi<strong>de</strong> them. From the outsi<strong>de</strong>r´s perspective, specific ways ofclassifying are <strong>de</strong>veloped, while from the insi<strong>de</strong>r´s point of view no classificatoryrepresentations are given; instead, explanations and narratives are given about thescientific activity <strong>de</strong>veloped by the scientists themselves.Keywords: representation, classification, transitivity, appraisal, scientific areas.Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse - Textual analysis for social research. London:Routledge.Gouveia, C.A.M. (2009). “Texto e gramática: uma introdução à linguística sistémico-funcional”,Matraga 24 (16), 13-47.Halli<strong>da</strong>y, M.A.K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revisão ChristianMatthiessen. London: Hod<strong>de</strong>r Arnold. [3ª ed.; 1 1985]PAPER SESSION 5B - ROOM 2 - WEDNESDAY, 27 JULYISFC38 Book of <strong>Abstracts</strong> Page 137 Lisbon, July 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!