Abstracts - Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TERESA CASTINEIRA, BENEMÉRITA UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE PUEBLASELF-REPRESENTATION OF TRAUMA: AN APPRAISAL, MULTIMODAL ANALYSISThis in-progress data-driven study examines the various semiotic resources ofdiscourse (language, pictures, colors, and symbols among other) utilized by EFLlearners who wrote about traumatic experiences such as rape, racism, and loss intheir autobiographies. Various approaches are used in the analysis of theseautobiographies such as genre analysis (Anderson, 2011), multimodality (Kress &van Leeuwen, 2005; Jones & Ventola, 2008), and appraisal (Martin & White, 2005).The autobiographies were written at the end of the 6 th . Level English course (B2according to the CEFr.) by students who are majoring in English Language Teachingin a public university in Mexico. 10 autobiographies were selected, five written byfemales, and five by males.The writers of these autobiographies express their feelings of despair, frustration,and pain with different linguistic resources, which were categorized under the threesystems of appraisal: engagement, attitude and graduation. Subsequently, theseresources were categorized under the various appraisal sub-systems. Extractsexemplifying these categorizations will be displayed. Besides language, writers useddifferent semiotic modes such as family pictures and paper with subliminalmessages to express other feelings. Samples of these resources will be presented.Due to the limited amount of data, generalizations cannot be drawn, however, wemay conclude that by expressing their feelings through different semiotic modes,these autobiographies may represent liberating tools for these particular EFLlearners.PAPER SESSION 1E, ROOM 5 - MONDAY 25 JULYISFC38 Book of Abstracts Page 190 Lisbon, July 2011
THU NGO, UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND, NSW, AUSTRALIAA CRITICAL REVIEW AND EXTENSION OF APPRAISAL THEORY FROM THEPERSPECTIVE OF THE VIETNAMESE LANGUAGEAppraisal theory, as an important part of negotiating interpersonal meaning put forward byMartin (2000), Martin & Rose (2003) and Martin & White(2005), has been undergoingconstant development. A large amount of research has focused on the application of thetheory and the coding methodology of appraisal in the study of various registers such asacademic writing, casual conversations, news reportage, historical discourse, peer reviewreport and so on (Hood, 2004, 2006), (Derewianka, 2007), (Bednarek, 2008), (Marshall,Adendorff, & de Klerk, 2010). Some pioneer scholars in the field even came up with somerefinement of the appraisal system (Hood, 2005; Bednarek 2008). However, most work hasbeen done in relation to the English language rather than a language other than English. Thispaper aims at presenting a critical review of the appraisal system from the perspective of theVietnamese language. A pilot study was conducted with four Vietnamese postgraduatestudents studying in Australia as a preliminary exploration of their use of evaluative languagein English and Vietnamese. Results from the study suggest that appraisal in Vietnamese coversall the categories and sub-categories of the current appraisal system in English. Furthermore,Vietnamese has more than that to offer to the system, with the systems of person referenceterms expressing evaluative meaning in certain contexts in addition to classifiers, particles,predicative elements (logical passive expressions) and reduplication.ReferencesBednarek, M. (2008). Emotion talk across corpora. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Derewianka, B. (2007). Using appraisal theory to track interpersonal development in adolescent academicwriting. In A. McCabe, M. O´Donnel & R. Whittaker (Eds.), Advances in Language and Education. London:Continuum.Hood, S. (2004). Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: a focus on the introductions toresearch reports. In J. L. Ravelli & A. R. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing Academic Writing: ContextualizingFrameworks. London: Continuum.Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of Englishfor Academic Purposes, 37-49.Marshall, C., Adendorff, R., & de Klerk, V. (2010). The role of APPRAISAL in the NRF Rating System: ananalysis of Judgement and Appreciation in peer reviewers´ reports. Southern African Linguistics and AppliedLanguage Studies, 27(4), 391-412.Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchange: appraisal system in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.),Evaluation in text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse Oxford: Oxford University Press.Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London/New York:Palgrave/Macmillan.PAPER SESSION 1C, ROOM 3 - MONDAY 25 JULYISFC38 Book of Abstracts Page 191 Lisbon, July 2011
Page 1 and 2:
BOOK OF ABSTRACTSISFC38Negotiating
Page 3 and 4:
WelcomeAs the convenor of the 38 th
Page 5 and 6:
Congress VenueFACULDADE DE LETRAS D
Page 7 and 8:
JAMES R. MARTIN, UNIVERSITY OF SYDN
Page 9 and 10:
J. LACHLAN MACKENZIE, ILTEC-INSTITU
Page 11 and 12:
ORLANDO VIAN JR., FEDERAL UNIVERSIT
Page 13 and 14:
Paper PresentationsADEGBOYE ADEYANJ
Page 15 and 16:
AIYOUB JODAIRI PINEH, THE UNIVERSIT
Page 17 and 18:
http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal
Page 19 and 20:
ALEXANNE DON, UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY,
Page 21 and 22:
ALICE CAFFAREL, THE UNIVERSITY OF S
Page 23 and 24:
ANDREA NINI, ASTON UNIVERSITYSYSTEM
Page 25 and 26:
ÂNGELA MARIA V. BOAS LEITE, UNIVER
Page 27 and 28:
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arus and Juan R
Page 29 and 30:
ANNE MCCABE, SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
Page 31 and 32:
ANTÓNIO M. S. AVELAR, FACULDADE DE
Page 33 and 34:
ARIANNA MAIORANI, LOUGHBOROUGH UNIV
Page 35 and 36:
AURORA DONZELLI, SLCTOWARDS AN EMAN
Page 37 and 38:
BEATRIZ QUIROZ, UNIVERSITY OF SYDNE
Page 39 and 40:
BIRGIT HUEMER, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA
Page 41 and 42:
CECILIA COLOMBI, UNIVERSITY OF CALI
Page 43 and 44:
CHANG CHENGUANG, SUN YAT-SEN UNIVER
Page 45:
CONGJUN MU, SHANGHAI MARITIME UNIVE
Page 48 and 49:
DAVID OLATUNDE FIKI-GEORGE, AHMADU
Page 50 and 51:
DEREK IRWIN, UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGH
Page 52 and 53:
DÉSIRÉE MOTTA-ROTH, UNIVERSIDADE
Page 54 and 55:
ESFL Conference & Workshop, Koper,
Page 56 and 57:
DORIS LARUBA OBIEJE, AHMADU BELLO U
Page 58 and 59:
DOROTHY ECONOMOU, UNIVERSITY OF SYD
Page 60 and 61:
ELAINE ESPINDOLA, THE HONG KONG POL
Page 62 and 63:
ELISSA ASP, SAINT MARY´S UNIVERSIT
Page 64 and 65:
ELIZABETH WALKER, HK INSTITUTE OF E
Page 66 and 67:
ESZTER SZENES, THE UNIVERSITY OF SY
Page 68 and 69:
FAN DAI, SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITYTHE
Page 70 and 71:
FEDERICO NAVARRO, UNIVERSIDAD DE BU
Page 72 and 73:
FLORIAN HISS, UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ
Page 74 and 75:
FUJITA TORU, GRADUATE SCHOOL, DOSHI
Page 76 and 77:
GERARD O'GRADY, CARDIFF UNIVERSITYP
Page 78 and 79:
GERSINEY PABLO SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE
Page 80 and 81:
GORDON TUCKER, CARDIFF UNIVERSITY´
Page 82 and 83:
GUO SONGDAN, THE HONG KONG POLYTECH
Page 84 and 85:
HONG HUAQING, NATIONAL INST. OF EDU
Page 86 and 87:
Machin, David (2007): Introduction
Page 88 and 89:
IRENE PASCUAL, UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOM
Page 90 and 91:
JACQUELINE FIUZA DA SILVA REGIS, UN
Page 92 and 93:
JANE HELEN JOHNSON, UNIVERSITY OF B
Page 94 and 95:
London: Continuum.Taverniers, M. (2
Page 96 and 97:
JIM DONOHUE, OPEN UNIVERSITYTEXT AN
Page 98 and 99:
JOANNE NEFF-VAN ARTSELAER, UNIVERSI
Page 100 and 101:
JOÃO BOSCO FIGUEIREDO-GOMES, UNIVE
Page 102 and 103:
JOSÉ MANUEL DURAN, UNIVERSIDAD DE
Page 104 and 105:
KAREN MALAN, LONDON METROPOLITAN UN
Page 106 and 107:
KEIZO NANRI, OITA UNIVERSITYQUARREL
Page 108 and 109:
KHALID KHALAF ALKHALAF, INSTITUTE O
Page 110 and 111:
LEILA BARBARA, PUCSP/CNPQ, BRAZILC
Page 112 and 113:
LEN UNSWORTH, UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENG
Page 114 and 115:
LEONARDO PEREIRA NUNES, FEDERAL UNI
Page 116 and 117:
LIBO GUO, NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNI
Page 118 and 119:
LILI CAVALHEIRO, ULICES / FACULTY O
Page 120 and 121:
LUÍSA ÁLVARES PEREIRA, UNIVERSIDA
Page 122 and 123:
MAKOTO SASAKI, AICHI GAKUIN UNIVERS
Page 124 and 125:
MARIA ANTÓNIA COUTINHO, CLUNL, UNI
Page 126 and 127:
MARIA APARECIDA CALTABIANO SILVA, P
Page 128 and 129:
MARIA GORETI MONTEIRO, INSTITUTO PO
Page 130 and 131:
MARÍA MARTÍNEZ LIROLA, UNIVERSITY
Page 132 and 133:
MARIA MEDIANEIRA DE SOUZA, UNIVERSI
Page 134 and 135:
MÁRIO MARTINS, ILTEC, UNIVERSIDADE
Page 136 and 137:
MARK SHIU KEE SHUM, FACULTY OF EDUC
Page 138 and 139:
MARTIN KALTENBACHER, UNIVERSITY OF
Page 140 and 141: MASAMICHI WASHITAKE, AICHI GAKUIN U
Page 142 and 143: MELANI NEKIC, JUSTUS-LIEBIG UNIVERS
Page 144 and 145: and New York: Routledge.Kress, G.,
Page 146 and 147: MICHAEL O'TOOLE, MURDOCH UNIVERSITY
Page 148 and 149: MIZUSAWA YUMIKO, KANAGAWA UNIVERSIT
Page 150 and 151: MONIQUE FROBERT-ADAMO, UNIVERSITÉ
Page 152 and 153: NASRIN HADIDI TAMJID, ISLAMIC AZAD
Page 154 and 155: NATALIA IGNATIEVA, UNIVERSITY OF ME
Page 156 and 157: PALLAM LAKSHMI NARASA DASU, THE ENG
Page 158 and 159: PATRICIA PAUGH, UNIVERSITY OF MASSA
Page 160 and 161: PATRICK KIERNAN, MEIJI UNIVERSITY,
Page 162 and 163: capital city of China, besides econ
Page 164 and 165: QI-LONG CHENG, SHANGHAI UNIVERSITYF
Page 166 and 167: RICCARDO GIOMI, INSTITUTO DE LINGU
Page 168 and 169: ROBIN FAWCETT, CARDIFF UNIVERSITY,
Page 170 and 171: Reutledge.Kress, G. et al. (2001).
Page 172 and 173: SAEIDEH AHANGARI, ISLAMIC AZAD UNIV
Page 174 and 175: SALVIO MARTÍN MENÉNDEZ, UNIVERSID
Page 176 and 177: SILVIA PESSOA, CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV
Page 178 and 179: SOLANGE TERESINHA RICARDO DE CASTRO
Page 180 and 181: SONJA STARC, UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSK
Page 182 and 183: STELLA NEUMANN, RWTH AACHEN UNIVERS
Page 184 and 185: London/New York: Longman. S. 232-27
Page 186 and 187: SUE SPINKS, MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY, A
Page 188 and 189: TAMMY SLATER, IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
Page 192 and 193: TOM BARTLETT, CARDIFF UNIVERSITYAMJ
Page 194 and 195: VERALUCIA GUIMARÃES DE SOUZA, PPGL
Page 196 and 197: VIOLETA QUENTAL, PONTÍFICA UNIVERS
Page 198 and 199: VIVIANE DE MELO RESENDE, UNIVERSIDA
Page 200 and 201: Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwoo
Page 202 and 203: Context in Functional Linguistics.
Page 204 and 205: XINGHUA LIU, UNIVERSITY OF READINGA
Page 206 and 207: ZOHRE SEIFOORI, ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVER
Page 208 and 209: teachers to engage all students and
Page 210 and 211: learners. Research in Australia fou
Page 212 and 213: CRISTIANE FUZER, UNIVERSIDADE FEDER
Page 214 and 215: eality show.3. Sara Regina Scotta C
Page 216 and 217: Considering the above description,
Page 218 and 219: This paper aims at looking into the
Page 220 and 221: disseminate subject knowledge in bo
Page 222 and 223: HIRAM MAXIM, EMORY UNIVERSITYSTUDEN
Page 224 and 225: discourses in the discipline. The c
Page 226 and 227: Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Ca
Page 228 and 229: Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text:
Page 230 and 231: sophisticated theory like SFG, and
Page 232 and 233: Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2005). D
Page 234 and 235: PAULINE JONES, UNIVERSITY OF WOLLON
Page 236 and 237: 3. Lorraine McDonald (Australian Ca
Page 238 and 239: TERESA OTEÍZA, PONTIFICIA UNIVERSI
Page 240 and 241:
Sciences, one of the aspects focuse
Page 242 and 243:
WorkshopsMONIQUE FROBERT-ADAMO, UNI
Page 244 and 245:
PETER R. R. WHITE, UNIVERSITY OF NE
Page 246 and 247:
mentioning previous studies on Them
Page 248 and 249:
Fawcett, Robin. P., 2009. ‘Seven
show all

Abstracts - Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?