12.07.2015 Views

State of Management of South Africa’s ... - WWF South Africa

State of Management of South Africa’s ... - WWF South Africa

State of Management of South Africa’s ... - WWF South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STATE OF MANAGEMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA’S MARINE PROTECTED AREASregulations for the MPA under the MLRA; however the regulations do provide that shoreangling is allowed.The manager at Betty’s Bay indicated that a dive ban in the MPA would facilitate complianceand that the MPA should be closed to shore angling. It was suggested that fines beincreased, the Green Court be reinstated and the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> poaching raised beyond that <strong>of</strong> a‘petty crime’. There is an inconsistency in the demarcation <strong>of</strong> the MPA in the proclamation inthat the eastern boundary <strong>of</strong> the MPA was described through the use <strong>of</strong> a beacon and GPScoordinates that do not align.Issues that need to be dealt with include the agreement between MCM and the OverstrandMunicipality as it was reported that there was no proactive management <strong>of</strong> penguins outside<strong>of</strong> the MPA and that penguins were being removed from municipal land.6.2.3 MPA designMPA DESIGN (67%)The MPA extends along the shore for 3km, between a beacon at Stony Point (westernboundary) and a beacon to the east <strong>of</strong> Jock’s Bay, and extends two nautical miles <strong>of</strong>fshorefrom the high water mark. A total area <strong>of</strong> 20.14km 2 is incorporated in the MPA. The MPA wasnot zoned and was managed as a controlled zone. Shore angling was the only consumptiveactivity that was permitted.The MPA included critical areas for abalone conservation and fish spawning; however all <strong>of</strong>these areas were not afforded extra protection as shore-angling was permitted. The size andshape <strong>of</strong> the MPA would be considered adequate if the MPA was zoned as a no-take area.There was no zonation <strong>of</strong> activities; however this was not required due to the structure <strong>of</strong> thecoastline and the influence this had on zoning activities naturally.6.2.4 MPA <strong>Management</strong> PlanEXISTENCE OF PLAN, OBJECTIVES AND REGULATIONS (83%)A comprehensive management plan for the MPA had recently been drafted. At the time <strong>of</strong>the assessment it was not yet approved but was being used to guide management. The planlisted the broad objectives for MPAs under the MLRA and the generic biophysical, social andgovernance objectives provided by CapeNature that were applicable to the MPA. Themanagement plan was designed so to aid in the achievement <strong>of</strong> these objectives. Allowableand restricted activities were dealt with clearly in the plan.PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND ADEQUACY (92%)The management plan set out priorities and facilitated resource allocation. The plan did notindicate specific management actions to be taken but work plans and operational plans couldPg 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!