12.07.2015 Views

The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

].44bodles. ODce the real referents are known, the 0rphlc interpre!ationbecoEes a1l but untena!1e, even though there havebeen sone modern connentators who have tried to shore up thispopular aIIcient explenat ion.I0iii) yen are gods. Seelng bo!h parts <strong>of</strong> the saying at'the same t1Ele, then, allor.rs us !o know that the subject underdiscussion is not souls but alhanatol and thnEtoi, As wasnentloned above, these rords have a wlde range <strong>of</strong> shsdes <strong>of</strong> meanin8dependlng upon ehere lre choose to understand sone sort <strong>of</strong>copula!ive. Io addltlon to this fact we Inust conslder the_polnt !hat athanatol tras connon parlance for !hlg!, lust asth.Ie-toi !'as for aothrdpol. This 1s so cornrnon a custoo fronllomer through all <strong>of</strong> anriquity that il hardly needs pro<strong>of</strong> (1toccurs over one hundred tl,nes in ilomer). IndivldualIy, thewords dld ndt have to rnean rBods' and'hum3ns',but irhen pulslde by side this neaning could oot be absent from the ninds<strong>of</strong> the listeners. Hence it seeEs inconceivable to ne !hat H.should have used this particular pair <strong>of</strong> !rords and not to haveintLnded for then to stand, at least 1n part, for gods andl0th.ro.. extrene orphlc lnterpletatlons <strong>of</strong> this fr. are those <strong>of</strong>Ada,', SCfig-.--I!gg!e!9,(Edinbursh, 1908), 238 and Macchtoro, [raclito' (Barl,1922), 87-94; From orpheus to Paul, (|i.r.,1930), 172-3. Uore noderate andcaulious slale.nenEs can be found-in Gurhrie, I,478 and Pdpin,39' For crlticlsn<strong>of</strong> )tacchioro' general thesls naking H, a latter day orphlc see Cuthrie,Orpheus & ck, Rel1g,,(2na ea.; Lond on , 1952 ) , 228 ff. and I,478 n.2-ilarcovich calle? tris theory "far-fetched" (stud, Patr lst ica ,711966),262 n.2),and there are really very few scholars no\tadays uho belleve orphiclsr canbe sho!,'n to have exelted nruch <strong>of</strong> an influence on H, cuthrie Is probablythe nos! open to the ldea, saying "the parallel with orphic notlons isstrlking'I (T,480). But Klrk flatly states that "orphic influence is not.., appa.ent 1n lleraclitus" (355). Rannoux would reverse the Problen:"ne pas derander si Hereclite est un orpiique, nais sl 1es orphlques sontbdraclltdens" (Ramoux, H6rac11te, [2nd ed.; Paris,l968],407),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!