The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2r4tldct in eonjunction wlth each other, Hatles and nlonysus nustrenaia separate exlstent gods for H., lust as they alrrays were.finally let it be stressed tha! the fact that we havenot fouDd a destructive theology ln II. does oot mean that U.does not have anything new to say. r think lt would be safeto sgy that hts theology, taken in Lts entlrety, is draDatical1ydlfferelrt fron the rellglous beliefs of ht6 fello$Ephestans. Yet 1t Ls not Heraclltusr poLnt to tlalicule o!deny the rites of hls fellows; he does not addreaa hlnaelf {r!the extent frr. to tearing dolln the exlstent !e1lgl.ous structure€,for he is too busy bulldlng one of hiE oi'n.
CHAPIER 4:C0NCIL:S IO)lour iovestlgatlon of EeraclitusItheology is non nearlydooe. 0ur oethod has beell to choose the DrinciDaI frr. relevadtto lhls !helde and to exanine these Ln sone de!al1. Adnitredly, io li. nore than in any olher pre s ocrat lc lhlnker,this proceCure .0lght seen a blt arbitrary since his lhoughtsand theoEles -- hence, hls fraSuen!s -- Blide ln!o each olherlrith depressiig ease. As CiSon once Poin!ed out, 1t is verysinple !o c:iurn out a coherent systeB for any of the earlyphllosophers, arrangiog Ehe frr, "Like sooe pic!ure gaI1ery",bu! whether t:1is display is historlcally accurate is qulteallo!her quesEl.on ("Theo1, der V o r s o k r a t ," , I 32 ) . I hope thatour careful ard detailed exallination of !he t[aioa frr. willhefp to assure this accuracy. IdeaIly, every fr. at all pertlnentto his theoloay shouLd have been so scruElnlzed, butrhe linits oi ci!e, space, and tediua have oade lhat inposslbLe.IIence, frr. but!resslng the arguBent have been included herear!d there rlthout eDbarrassnent qrith the understaodinp that abetter slud.! of iheo would have yie!.ded !he !0eanil1g that wasnecessarlly assuEed. What 1s left for us nor is to recapitulaEethe conclusioas we have reached 1n our discussiorls of the Drecedlngftr. in order to get ar overall inpression of the Ephesian 's iheology .One r: !he !hemes of this uork has been to illustrate2ts
Page 1 and 2:
(srrv auTJ to unasnK tsadepng) sntl
Page 3 and 4:
TSE TIIEOLOGY OF HER.{CLITUSA PRESO
Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF AB BREV IAT I ONS_ID_order
Page 7:
INlRODUCTIONAs far as we kno1.r, He
Page 11 and 12:
5the flood of nords on I{. shou any
Page 13 and 14:
1belng xouddled to say that the eor
Page 15 and 16:
9and Thales phrsikol wh1le nen llke
Page 17 and 18:
l1rabble would not read 1t. As the
Page 19 and 20:
l3eleBeots. Eowevet in the huhan sp
Page 21 and 22:
CEAPTER lrPIi-TEEISMIn thl.s chapte
Page 23 and 24:
17A. The Text of F!.67There Ls only
Page 25 and 26:
19of god and fire (cf. above, p.17
Page 27 and 28:
2Ithen trying to smel1 the nost obt
Page 29 and 30:
the large number of people irho acc
Page 31 and 32:
25have transnl!ted these sayings. A
Page 33 and 34:
27ts, rne uontext ot !r.b/lllppolyt
Page 35 and 36:
C. The lnterpretation of 1r.67ttavi
Page 37 and 38:
31.acknorledged, though "dic!un" (s
Page 39 and 40:
33The fourth arld flnal potnt is re
Page 41 and 42:
35L'i11 add the verb and bope for t
Page 43 and 44:
37translation that reflects this fa
Page 45 and 46:
a scalene trlangle. This i{ou1d exp
Page 47 and 48:
u) xdooe I uuo'e4tThis ts the final
Page 49 and 50:
43could be used, For it could be ar
Page 51 and 52:
as single'th!ngs' be1ov, pp.57-8. )
Page 53 and 54:
47p.24. Even though they do not rep
Page 55 and 56:
49Even thouah the gloss corfidently
Page 57 and 58:
follons:ou.Ll.duLES o),q' xq.r ouxa
Page 59 and 60:
53terl.on of banality,assunes r,hat
Page 61 and 62:
55from hen !3!!3". Yet thl6 seens v
Page 63 and 64:
clains?" I think he did believe rhi
Page 65 and 66:
59oppos ir es i this is the neanlng
Page 67 and 68:
6lhave been re-introduced falsely o
Page 69 and 70:
63freenan), but it cantrot be rlght
Page 71 and 72:
obher exanples fronl tragedy could
Page 73 and 74:
67to theos are to god.But lrhat are
Page 75 and 76:
seeEs inescapable then that divintt
Page 77 and 78:
71bet\reen H. and Porphyry some cor
Page 79 and 80:
73worthy crlterlon of genuineness,
Page 81 and 82:
75B. The Context of fr.l02As was ne
Page 83 and 84:
77that elLLEg and dikaia funcrion a
Page 85 and 86:
79tlariesthattleantin that one telm
Page 87 and 88:
8lacter does not have true understa
Page 89 and 90:
83aoount of naturlty, insight, or w
Page 91 and 92:
aII; it is divine. cod and man are
Page 93 and 94:
left nith the problen of how Il. co
Page 95 and 96:
89by berit of thel! being at least
Page 97 and 98:
9lli.teral interp!etatlon of Eetacl
Page 99 and 100:
93lrolld view.only then n11I we be
Page 101 and 102:
additton of the \rord ln the other
Page 103 and 104:
97seems to me to be thatthe nordsrr
Page 105 and 106:
99stood the lrord. l.Je find thar h
Page 107 and 108:
101he!e not as a description of lLL
Page 109 and 110:
03C. lnEerpretation of Fr.30As ls o
Page 111 and 112:
meanings and have been underslood,
Page 113 and 114:
107for this lack of support. lirst,
Page 115 and 116:
109certaln early Aon-techolcal Elea
Page 117 and 118:
lrlau thor .Therefore Lt seen6 prob
Page 119 and 120:
113gods or men llade this kosmos'r
Page 121 and 122:
ll5rsystenof 1awsr. Understood in t
Page 123 and 124:
1t7So far so good, but the saying g
Page 125 and 126:
atrd being so rarified could be see
Page 127 and 128:
to his nind the more probable origi
Page 129 and 130:
althar ras an entrenched popular no
Page 131 and 132:
t25aBythLn8 nithout beginnlng and e
Page 133 and 134:
tz7active as r,re1l as a power of d
Page 135 and 136:
t29!tna11y, the conclusion to the g
Page 137 and 138:
. 131at 1arge, but n. 1s the flrst
Page 139 and 140:
to be the nnost original, dlsplayin
Page 141 and 142:
135ls far nore problematlc. How can
Page 143 and 144:
37odd syntax rhich seeus to give ac
Page 145 and 146:
39have not found the opposite expre
Page 147 and 148:
141nhat life and death really are.
Page 149 and 150:
of 362 packs a punch that lhe plaln
Page 151 and 152:
145nen. SorDe of our anclent source
Page 153 and 154:
47These fr!. rdight indeed suggest
Page 155 and 156:
I49tha! humans have a divine elemen
Page 157 and 158:
l,)rhe denied that L|Eh! IIow ue ar
Page 159 and 160:
53insteadof d evot ingsPecia 1 sect
Page 161 and 162:
this sense. When the word appears i
Page 163 and 164:
157etyEology of the l'oril Irom Lhe
Page 165 and 166:
t59Early ek. Thoughr", f43A, 80t194
Page 167 and 168:
61dairn6n in fr.II9 to mean rluck'o
Page 169 and 170: After a1t, Stobaeus is not a parric
Page 171 and 172: noEinal sentences. For an author to
Page 173 and 174: t67D, fr.l19 lnterpretedIlaviIIg ex
Page 175 and 176: 169daiuones (so cuthrie, I,482; cr.
Page 177 and 178: 71are, to have gnonE (878), then ne
Page 179 and 180: t7 3The meanlng of datnonos hereis
Page 181 and 182: 175is ca 1I ed dain6n" (crat. 398c1
Page 183 and 184: 177and therefore unquestloned, In !
Page 185 and 186: Fr.l5 (50II, 127Br)The best place t
Page 187 and 188: punctuatton is correct since e have
Page 189 and 190: the ntne vat. 6If any doubt .ernain
Page 191 and 192: 185u. svnEax oI Ir.I)Thls saying is
Page 193 and 194: 187!eve1ers, or perhaps tden genera
Page 195 and 196: 189but such a translation can be mi
Page 197 and 198: 91Itr additlon to tlese neanings, t
Page 199 and 200: 193enbarrassment and s}lar e of the
Page 201 and 202: 195iii) ANAIAETTATA. When we cone t
Page 203 and 204: t97says that !hese people would do
Page 205 and 206: 199p9]f91r not the cerenony. The cl
Page 207 and 208: 201the particle 68. Early style did
Page 209 and 210: 203clearest example of this type of
Page 211 and 212: 205Nike, a satyr, and two Maenads.
Page 213 and 214: ,1The eonnection of llades rith dea
Page 215 and 216: 209their rites are non-harnful Jusr
Page 217 and 218: 2tl(aoaidestata) if they did not do
Page 219: person 1s free to read fr.68 in any
Page 223 and 224: 217Another conioon Greek belief fro
Page 225 and 226: has argued (Kahn, 11, 19, 269, 277)
Page 227 and 228: 221tire conEon state of affairs aro
Page 229 and 230: 223na ric rr^^ai af..i.,L.rion that
Page 231 and 232: 225bl-ri in iris lnplicacion that u
Page 233 and 234: 227rarae aves ilr ancient tioesr an
Page 235 and 236: 229us off fror the naLural Civinity
Page 237 and 238: 23rDiogenes ln B5 (DK: II,6I, l1-4)
Page 239 and 240: 233says in his Ck, Lexicosraphical
Page 241 and 242: 235srressing thaE it is idenlica1 o
Page 243 and 244: ,Jv* -c6g' doiroe ori &.(r"-or y r'
Page 245 and 246: Ilouever, Ehe precis€ relat lonsh
Page 247 and 248: 24Ithat was a1k'ays preselrt ilr th
Page 249 and 250: 243New TestanenE sense, a sense rxi
Page 251 and 252: 245ignorant of it. The question is'
Page 253 and 254: 241an account.'r once se suppose \r
Page 255 and 256: 249c. NoTE 0n PERStrIIoNE A-'D HnAK
Page 257 and 258: 25rThe reason that the nentlonof Pe
Page 259 and 260: 253very si:ilar,ihaE Ephesur' cuLE
Page 261 and 262: 255tieraclitus of Ephesus. Intro. a
Page 263 and 264: 257Erffa, C. E. F. von. AfAOt und v
Page 265 and 266: 259"Gr Certain FragEen!s of the Pre
Page 267 and 268: 261McKay, K. J. "Anbivalenr AIACI i
Page 269 and 270: negnJrr, tuns.1967 -Ancieo! Views o
Page 271 and 272:
26sr2(19s9) , 297 ."Ileraclitus B 8
Page 273 and 274:
TIIE THEOLOGY OF HEMCLITUS: A PRESO
show all

The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?