The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HS I SITJ NVdcrrvuJosrxa Ys otrISvxsH JO tCO'to[Ht sEJ
TSE TIIEOLOGY OF HER.{CLITUSA PRESOCRATIC PANTBEI SMbyDavtd J,Valtu1isDepartment of PhilosophyA Thesis submttted in confor!0ity with the requi!elnentsfor the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in theIJniversity of Totonto@ D. J.vaIiulis, 1980
Page 1: (srrv auTJ to unasnK tsadepng) sntl
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF AB BREV IAT I ONS_ID_order
Page 7: INlRODUCTIONAs far as we kno1.r, He
Page 11 and 12: 5the flood of nords on I{. shou any
Page 13 and 14: 1belng xouddled to say that the eor
Page 15 and 16: 9and Thales phrsikol wh1le nen llke
Page 17 and 18: l1rabble would not read 1t. As the
Page 19 and 20: l3eleBeots. Eowevet in the huhan sp
Page 21 and 22: CEAPTER lrPIi-TEEISMIn thl.s chapte
Page 23 and 24: 17A. The Text of F!.67There Ls only
Page 25 and 26: 19of god and fire (cf. above, p.17
Page 27 and 28: 2Ithen trying to smel1 the nost obt
Page 29 and 30: the large number of people irho acc
Page 31 and 32: 25have transnl!ted these sayings. A
Page 33 and 34: 27ts, rne uontext ot !r.b/lllppolyt
Page 35 and 36: C. The lnterpretation of 1r.67ttavi
Page 37 and 38: 31.acknorledged, though "dic!un" (s
Page 39 and 40: 33The fourth arld flnal potnt is re
Page 41 and 42: 35L'i11 add the verb and bope for t
Page 43 and 44: 37translation that reflects this fa
Page 45 and 46: a scalene trlangle. This i{ou1d exp
Page 47 and 48: u) xdooe I uuo'e4tThis ts the final
Page 49 and 50: 43could be used, For it could be ar
Page 51 and 52: as single'th!ngs' be1ov, pp.57-8. )
Page 53 and 54:
47p.24. Even though they do not rep
Page 55 and 56:
49Even thouah the gloss corfidently
Page 57 and 58:
follons:ou.Ll.duLES o),q' xq.r ouxa
Page 59 and 60:
53terl.on of banality,assunes r,hat
Page 61 and 62:
55from hen !3!!3". Yet thl6 seens v
Page 63 and 64:
clains?" I think he did believe rhi
Page 65 and 66:
59oppos ir es i this is the neanlng
Page 67 and 68:
6lhave been re-introduced falsely o
Page 69 and 70:
63freenan), but it cantrot be rlght
Page 71 and 72:
obher exanples fronl tragedy could
Page 73 and 74:
67to theos are to god.But lrhat are
Page 75 and 76:
seeEs inescapable then that divintt
Page 77 and 78:
71bet\reen H. and Porphyry some cor
Page 79 and 80:
73worthy crlterlon of genuineness,
Page 81 and 82:
75B. The Context of fr.l02As was ne
Page 83 and 84:
77that elLLEg and dikaia funcrion a
Page 85 and 86:
79tlariesthattleantin that one telm
Page 87 and 88:
8lacter does not have true understa
Page 89 and 90:
83aoount of naturlty, insight, or w
Page 91 and 92:
aII; it is divine. cod and man are
Page 93 and 94:
left nith the problen of how Il. co
Page 95 and 96:
89by berit of thel! being at least
Page 97 and 98:
9lli.teral interp!etatlon of Eetacl
Page 99 and 100:
93lrolld view.only then n11I we be
Page 101 and 102:
additton of the \rord ln the other
Page 103 and 104:
97seems to me to be thatthe nordsrr
Page 105 and 106:
99stood the lrord. l.Je find thar h
Page 107 and 108:
101he!e not as a description of lLL
Page 109 and 110:
03C. lnEerpretation of Fr.30As ls o
Page 111 and 112:
meanings and have been underslood,
Page 113 and 114:
107for this lack of support. lirst,
Page 115 and 116:
109certaln early Aon-techolcal Elea
Page 117 and 118:
lrlau thor .Therefore Lt seen6 prob
Page 119 and 120:
113gods or men llade this kosmos'r
Page 121 and 122:
ll5rsystenof 1awsr. Understood in t
Page 123 and 124:
1t7So far so good, but the saying g
Page 125 and 126:
atrd being so rarified could be see
Page 127 and 128:
to his nind the more probable origi
Page 129 and 130:
althar ras an entrenched popular no
Page 131 and 132:
t25aBythLn8 nithout beginnlng and e
Page 133 and 134:
tz7active as r,re1l as a power of d
Page 135 and 136:
t29!tna11y, the conclusion to the g
Page 137 and 138:
. 131at 1arge, but n. 1s the flrst
Page 139 and 140:
to be the nnost original, dlsplayin
Page 141 and 142:
135ls far nore problematlc. How can
Page 143 and 144:
37odd syntax rhich seeus to give ac
Page 145 and 146:
39have not found the opposite expre
Page 147 and 148:
141nhat life and death really are.
Page 149 and 150:
of 362 packs a punch that lhe plaln
Page 151 and 152:
145nen. SorDe of our anclent source
Page 153 and 154:
47These fr!. rdight indeed suggest
Page 155 and 156:
I49tha! humans have a divine elemen
Page 157 and 158:
l,)rhe denied that L|Eh! IIow ue ar
Page 159 and 160:
53insteadof d evot ingsPecia 1 sect
Page 161 and 162:
this sense. When the word appears i
Page 163 and 164:
157etyEology of the l'oril Irom Lhe
Page 165 and 166:
t59Early ek. Thoughr", f43A, 80t194
Page 167 and 168:
61dairn6n in fr.II9 to mean rluck'o
Page 169 and 170:
After a1t, Stobaeus is not a parric
Page 171 and 172:
noEinal sentences. For an author to
Page 173 and 174:
t67D, fr.l19 lnterpretedIlaviIIg ex
Page 175 and 176:
169daiuones (so cuthrie, I,482; cr.
Page 177 and 178:
71are, to have gnonE (878), then ne
Page 179 and 180:
t7 3The meanlng of datnonos hereis
Page 181 and 182:
175is ca 1I ed dain6n" (crat. 398c1
Page 183 and 184:
177and therefore unquestloned, In !
Page 185 and 186:
Fr.l5 (50II, 127Br)The best place t
Page 187 and 188:
punctuatton is correct since e have
Page 189 and 190:
the ntne vat. 6If any doubt .ernain
Page 191 and 192:
185u. svnEax oI Ir.I)Thls saying is
Page 193 and 194:
187!eve1ers, or perhaps tden genera
Page 195 and 196:
189but such a translation can be mi
Page 197 and 198:
91Itr additlon to tlese neanings, t
Page 199 and 200:
193enbarrassment and s}lar e of the
Page 201 and 202:
195iii) ANAIAETTATA. When we cone t
Page 203 and 204:
t97says that !hese people would do
Page 205 and 206:
199p9]f91r not the cerenony. The cl
Page 207 and 208:
201the particle 68. Early style did
Page 209 and 210:
203clearest example of this type of
Page 211 and 212:
205Nike, a satyr, and two Maenads.
Page 213 and 214:
,1The eonnection of llades rith dea
Page 215 and 216:
209their rites are non-harnful Jusr
Page 217 and 218:
2tl(aoaidestata) if they did not do
Page 219 and 220:
person 1s free to read fr.68 in any
Page 221 and 222:
CHAPIER 4:C0NCIL:S IO)lour iovestlg
Page 223 and 224:
217Another conioon Greek belief fro
Page 225 and 226:
has argued (Kahn, 11, 19, 269, 277)
Page 227 and 228:
221tire conEon state of affairs aro
Page 229 and 230:
223na ric rr^^ai af..i.,L.rion that
Page 231 and 232:
225bl-ri in iris lnplicacion that u
Page 233 and 234:
227rarae aves ilr ancient tioesr an
Page 235 and 236:
229us off fror the naLural Civinity
Page 237 and 238:
23rDiogenes ln B5 (DK: II,6I, l1-4)
Page 239 and 240:
233says in his Ck, Lexicosraphical
Page 241 and 242:
235srressing thaE it is idenlica1 o
Page 243 and 244:
,Jv* -c6g' doiroe ori &.(r"-or y r'
Page 245 and 246:
Ilouever, Ehe precis€ relat lonsh
Page 247 and 248:
24Ithat was a1k'ays preselrt ilr th
Page 249 and 250:
243New TestanenE sense, a sense rxi
Page 251 and 252:
245ignorant of it. The question is'
Page 253 and 254:
241an account.'r once se suppose \r
Page 255 and 256:
249c. NoTE 0n PERStrIIoNE A-'D HnAK
Page 257 and 258:
25rThe reason that the nentlonof Pe
Page 259 and 260:
253very si:ilar,ihaE Ephesur' cuLE
Page 261 and 262:
255tieraclitus of Ephesus. Intro. a
Page 263 and 264:
257Erffa, C. E. F. von. AfAOt und v
Page 265 and 266:
259"Gr Certain FragEen!s of the Pre
Page 267 and 268:
261McKay, K. J. "Anbivalenr AIACI i
Page 269 and 270:
negnJrr, tuns.1967 -Ancieo! Views o
Page 271 and 272:
26sr2(19s9) , 297 ."Ileraclitus B 8
Page 273 and 274:
TIIE THEOLOGY OF HEMCLITUS: A PRESO
show all

The Theology of Heraclitus: a Presocratic Pantheism

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?