2006 Water Comprehensive Plan - City of Bellevue

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Consistency w/SPU forecast for water supplied by SPU, if an SPU customer:N/A. Please state whether the supply forecast is the same as that within the Cascade TSP,or explain any differences.SPU contract (quantities, rates): N/A.Reasonable time frames for proposed new sources of supply: To be addressedin discussion of TPU supplies.Adequate storage: Appears to be OK, including discussion of possible needsrelated to areas of growth.Distribution problems (pressure, leaks): Appears to be OK. Very good job onanalysis, and on system operation. Are there any distribution problems with WaterDistricts 1, 20, and/or 117? Have the issues with regard to Cougar Mountain beenresolved?Water rightsClaims, certificates, permits: Appears to be OK.Primary vs. supplemental: Appears to be OKInstream flow constraints: Appears to be OKSufficient to meet supply needs: Appears to be OK.DOE opinion/comments on water rights assessment: Has Bellevue gottenEcology comments? If so, please provide.ID any potential issues with place/purpose of use: Per Section 5 of MunicipalWater Law, is Bellevue claiming any changes in place of use?Tribal issues: Have any tribes received, reviewed, or commented on the plan?ConservationDocumented conservation measures: References to regional conservationprogram; please define (e.g., SPU 1%; current Cascade; projected Cascade?). Pleasedescribe relationship to Cascade conservation program (e.g. does it partially meetBellevue’s obligations, or completely meet?), and the conservation assumptions made inthe Cascade TSP. Note also that the new DOH WUE rule will require Bellevue to adopta conservation goal before the next iteration of the Water System Plan (see bottom of p.4-9 in terms of conservation assumptions). Good discussion (Table 5-5) on conservationsavings. Any thoughts on why commercial conservation savings are not as high asresidential?Consistency w/DOH guidance: Appears to be OK.Aggressive pursuit (per KC Comp Plan): Good discussion of plannedconservation program, and Table 5-6, linked with Cascade’s CPS. Statements with regardto conservation (see p. 4-9) seem to imply that water conservation measures may notcontinue because of cost; is this correct? Good language on p. 5-2 re intent to meetsubstantive requirements and be proactive.Rate structure (RCW 43.20.235): block rates, subsidies: Good block ratestructure (p.5-11).Cost-effective evaluation; measures not implemented (per Section 5(2)MWL) : Could not find this evaluation, as required by MWL and in DOH checklists;please provide or cite page. Are there cost-effective conservation measures that Bellevuehas not implemented? (Not clear on p. 5-4).
Plans for WUE DOH rule compliance: Please describe if known.Leakage rate and plans: Good discussion.SPU regional plan: N/A.Reclaimed WaterIdentification of opportunities for reclaimed water (per MWL): Table 5-4 isgood. King County anticipates continuing to work with Bellevue as one of the Cascademembers on strategies to expand reclaimed water use.Specific applications (golf courses, athletic fields): Table 5-4. Note that theremay be more detailed data available from the Regional Water Supply Planning process’technical committee on reclaimed water.Self-supplied users w/in service areaCoordination w/wastewater utilityKC Comp PlanLevel of service: consistent w/land use, and w/service area policies: See above.Concurrency: See questions re delivery of service within UGA.Resource management (esp groundwater—CARA, existence of exempt wells,impacts to streamflows): Identify issues, if any.Other plans (e.g., watershed/salmon recovery): Bellevue should note itsparticipation in the WRIA 8 process, and any commitments it has under the finalrecovery plan (or identify where this information is).Service area approach/service area map changes: See above questions remaps.Financial/capital facilities: See below questions re MWL implementation (dutyto serve, timely and reasonable), and service within UGA.Emergency Preparedness: Note that facilities maps (Chapter 6) may be neededby King County for public health and emergency purposes.Others (list): NoneFire CodeStandards met (fire marshal; CWSP): No apparent issues.TransportationReference to KC road standards: The plan should contain a reference tocomplying with current King County standards; we could not locate this statement.Identification of emergency response numbers: These numbers should beincluded in the plan.Planned work/coordination: No apparent issues.ROW permits: See below.Water qualityTreatment? Issues?: No apparent issues.Source mixing? Will there be any issues associated with delivery of TPU water?Of delivery of other water via interties among Cascade members.
Page 1 and 2:
WaterComprehensivePlan
Page 6 and 7:
ASSET MANAGEMENTR&R needs areregula
Page 8 and 9:
CONTENTSExecutive SummaryPageiiiCha
Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 12 - Financial Information
Page 12 and 13:
10-1 Federal Drinking Water Quality
Page 14 and 15:
CHAPTER 1IntroductionUtilities Depa
Page 16 and 17:
Demand. The quantity of water obtai
Page 18 and 19:
EKCEast King CountyEKC-CWSP East Ki
Page 20 and 21:
CHAPTER 2Water Utility PoliciesThe
Page 22 and 23:
owner agrees to reimburse the City
Page 24 and 25:
Facility AbandonmentWhen the Utilit
Page 26 and 27:
Discussion:The Utility should syste
Page 28 and 29:
Discussion:It is Bellevue’s polic
Page 30 and 31:
Discussion:In 1982, Bellevue, along
Page 32 and 33:
Waterworks UtilityFinancial Policie
Page 34:
B. Self-sufficient FundingEach Util
Page 40 and 41:
B. Funding LevelsFunding for capita
Page 44 and 45:
D. Capital Facilities Renewal & Rep
Page 46 and 47:
overhead for developer extension pr
Page 48 and 49:
equired to balance the expenses. A
Page 50 and 51:
demonstrate that the hydrologic res
Page 52:
adopted to recover those costs dire
Page 55 and 56:
In 2004, the Financial Consulting S
Page 57 and 58:
Discussion:Providing reserves for e
Page 59 and 60:
individual Transportation Analysis
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3-2Residential Population Pro
Page 63 and 64:
2006CURRENT LAND USENE 8TH ST104TH
Page 65 and 66:
SERVICE AREAThe current Bellevue ci
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3-3Interties(Regional Supply
Page 69 and 70:
Bellevue and Kirkland are currently
Page 71 and 72:
Water District No. 22Water District
Page 73 and 74:
Utility Service Review ProceduresTh
Page 75 and 76:
CHAPTER 4Water RequirementsThe exis
Page 77 and 78:
This type of demand is relatively c
Page 79 and 80:
• Apparent Losses: Includes unaut
Page 81 and 82:
Existing DemandExisting water deman
Page 83 and 84:
The future build-out demand project
Page 85 and 86:
Table 4-4cBuildout Demand Projectio
Page 88 and 89:
Table 4-6Comparison of Eastside Com
Page 90 and 91:
pressure throughout the rest of the
Page 92 and 93:
Pressure ZonesPressure zones are de
Page 94 and 95:
CHAPTER 5Water ConservationThe City
Page 96 and 97:
identifies the main categories of a
Page 98 and 99:
Table 5-2Historical Conservation Me
Page 100 and 101:
Speakers BureauThis measure is defi
Page 102 and 103:
Bill Showing Consumption HistoryThi
Page 104 and 105:
schedules, and efficient irrigation
Page 106 and 107:
Seasonal Demand ManagementThis meas
Page 108 and 109:
RowTable 5-5Conservation Savings Ac
Page 110 and 111:
Figure 5-1Single Family Water Use P
Page 112 and 113:
Since the post-conservation era beg
Page 114 and 115:
statement about each measure is inc
Page 116 and 117:
CHAPTER 6Existing SystemThis chapte
Page 118 and 119:
KIRKLANDREDMONDLakeWashingtonWest B
Page 123 and 124:
City of BellevueWater Pressure Zone
Page 125 and 126:
Supply ConnectionNE 40th InletCherr
Page 127 and 128:
appropriate, PRV records also inclu
Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-5Pump StationsPage 1 of 2Na
Page 131 and 132:
Table 6-6Storage FacilitiesPage 1 o
Page 133 and 134:
HYDRAULIC OPERATIONSTables 6-7 thro
Page 135 and 136:
ZonePrimary SupplyConnectionsReserv
Page 137 and 138:
ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMEN
Page 139 and 140:
total business risk exposure.Determ
Page 141 and 142:
PIPELINE RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENTBel
Page 143 and 144:
In 1999 Montgomery Watson completed
Page 145 and 146:
CHAPTER 8System AnalysisThe purpose
Page 147 and 148:
from Seattle’s Eastgate and SE 28
Page 149 and 150:
year. When these small-diameter pip
Page 151 and 152:
Fire Flow VolumeDefinitionWAC 246-2
Page 153 and 154:
increase in demand anticipated due
Page 155 and 156:
Table 8-1bSummary of Storage Evalua
Page 157 and 158:
Storage Conclusions and Recommendat
Page 159 and 160:
To evaluate required capacity for t
Page 161:
CHAPTER 9Operations and Maintenance
Page 166 and 167:
Table 9-1Engineering and Environmen
Page 168 and 169:
Table 9-3Water Department Vehicles
Page 170 and 171:
RECORDS AND DATA MANAGEMENTSystem O
Page 172 and 173:
Pump Stations. Each pump station is
Page 174 and 175:
CHAPTER 10Water QualityThis Chapter
Page 176 and 177:
Bellevue is responsible for monitor
Page 178 and 179:
Table 10-2Annual Average of Total T
Page 180 and 181:
esponsible for collecting any repea
Page 182 and 183:
While the CCR provides an annual
Page 184 and 185:
• Very Small System Waiver - Syst
Page 186 and 187:
CCL, which is comprised of 51 (nine
Page 188 and 189:
• Aging infrastructure and corros
Page 190 and 191:
SUMMARY OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTST
Page 192 and 193:
. At the time the backflow preventi
Page 194 and 195:
Element 8: The purveyor shall inclu
Page 196 and 197:
separation of common water inlets/o
Page 198 and 199:
Fire Hydrant ImprovementsThis progr
Page 200 and 201:
PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENTSCapit
Page 202 and 203:
CHAPTER 12Financial InformationThis
Page 204 and 205:
TABLE 12-2City of BellevueWater Uti
Page 206 and 207:
during periods of high expenditures
Page 208 and 209:
Bonds issued by the "Waterworks Uti
Page 210 and 211:
TABLE 12-5City of BellevueWaterwork
Page 220:
APPENDIX BService Area and Adjacent
Page 486 and 487: APPENDIX DAdjacent Purveyor Review
Page 488 and 489: CopyCenterFrom: Thompson, Randall L
Page 490 and 491: CopyCenterFrom:Scott Thomasson [STH
Page 492 and 493: CopyCenterFrom:Bob Trimble [bob.tri
Page 496 and 497: Provision of SDWA water quality rep
Page 498 and 499: • Federally-approved habitat cons
Page 500: APPENDIX EConsistency Statement Let
show all

2006 Water Comprehensive Plan - City of Bellevue

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?