Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of water supply system – Case study in Naka, NigeriaTable of contentsList of tables and figuresvList of abbreviationsvi1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 11.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 11.2 SMALL TOWN CONTEXT........................................................................................... 21.3 PROJECT CONTEXT................................................................................................... 21.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES............................................................................................. 31.5 APPROACH OF THE SUBJECT..................................................................................... 31.6 STRUCTURE OF THESIS ............................................................................................. 42 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................... 52.1 EVALUATION OF WATER PROJECT ............................................................................ 52.2 GENERAL BACKGROUND ABOUT WATER PROJECTS ISSUES....................................... 72.3 COMMUNITY-MANAGED SYSTEM: THE WATER USERS’ ASSOCIATION OPTION........... 72.4 WATER QUALITY MONITORING ................................................................................ 83 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 103.1 PROJECT CHARACTERISATION................................................................................ 103.2 DESK BASED PREPARATION OF FIELD RESEARCH.................................................... 103.3 FIELD WORK & ADAPTATION OF THE METHODOLOGY ............................................ 123.4 TECHNIQUES USED TO AVOID RESEARCH BIASES.................................................... 143.5 DATA ANALYSIS..................................................................................................... 144 FURTHER PRESENTATION OF THE COMMUNITY OF NAKA, BETWEENURBAN AND RURAL ................................................................................................. 165 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 185.1 INDICATORS’ VALUES TABLE ................................................................................. 185.2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND LEVEL OF SERVICES ........................................................... 205.2.1 Physical infrastructure state....................................................................... 205.2.2 Water quantity ............................................................................................ 205.2.3 Water quality at tap .................................................................................... 225.2.4 System performance at WTP ...................................................................... 225.2.5 Reliability of the water supply.................................................................... 235.2.6 Convenience of water points ...................................................................... 235.2.7 Use of water facilities and for what purposes ............................................ 245.2.8 Equity.......................................................................................................... 245.3 MANAGEMENT / SUSTAINABILITY ASPECT ............................................................. 255.3.1 Operation and maintenance ....................................................................... 255.3.2 Management ............................................................................................... 255.3.3 Financing.................................................................................................... 265.3.4 Equity.......................................................................................................... 275.3.5 Quality monitoring ..................................................................................... 275.3.6 Community (mobilisation, ownership, habits)............................................ 285.3.7 Stakeholders of the project ......................................................................... 285.4 EXPANSION PLAN................................................................................................... 29Cranfield University at Silsoe iii Florianne Bourrigault (2006)
Evaluation of water supply system – Case study in Naka, Nigeria6 DISCUSSION............................................................................................................. 316.1 RESULTS FINDINGS................................................................................................. 316.2 VALIDITY OF METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 326.2.1 Possible improvements of the method ........................................................ 326.2.2 Replicability of this evaluation approach................................................... 336.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE WORK ................................................................................... 347 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 357.1 EXTENT OF MEETING AIM AND OBJECTIVES............................................................ 357.2 CHALLENGE AHEAD............................................................................................... 368 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 378.1 CONCERNING THE RESEARCH PROJECT................................................................... 378.2 CONCERNING THE WATER PROJECT........................................................................ 378.3 FURTHER RESEARCH FOR THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS............................................ 379 LIST OF REFERENCES.......................................................................................... 38AppendicesCranfield University at Silsoe iv Florianne Bourrigault (2006)
Page 1 and 2: Cranfield UniversityInstitute of Wa
Page 3: Evaluation of water supply system -
Page 7 and 8: Evaluation of water supply system -
Page 51 and 52: Preparation of field researchAdapta
Page 53 and 54: Criteria of evaluation - Indicators
Page 55 and 56:
Evaluation of water supply system -
show all

Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?