Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES
Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES
Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Preparation <strong>of</strong> field researchAdaptation on the fieldMeans <strong>of</strong> verification - Methods Done Alternatives/complementary New <strong>in</strong>dicators/criteria chosen toCriteria <strong>of</strong> evaluation - Indicators associatedplanned? data collection <strong>in</strong>-fieldadapt the local situation<strong>water</strong> quantity (supplied at tap) <strong>water</strong> quantity (at the WTP)per capita <strong>water</strong> resources availablecollect data from Water Board Measurements at WTPcollect data from governmentCollect data <strong>of</strong> nationalcensus about populationstandardsvariation <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> resources available throughout theyear SSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps SSI with caretakers<strong>water</strong> quality (at tap)turbidity, pH, colour, taste, odour, chlor<strong>in</strong>e residualcollect <strong>water</strong> quality monitor<strong>in</strong>gdocuments <strong>of</strong> WTP SSI with users <strong>of</strong> tapstaps <strong>in</strong>spection measurements at WTPsanitary survey <strong>of</strong> the pipepresence <strong>of</strong> coliformscollect data from Water Board<strong>system</strong>collect data from LGA HealthDepartmentcollect <strong>water</strong> quality monitor<strong>in</strong>gvariation <strong>of</strong> quality throughout the yeardocuments <strong>of</strong> WTP SSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps reliability <strong>of</strong> the <strong>water</strong> <strong>supply</strong>frequency <strong>of</strong> stoppages SSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps duration <strong>of</strong> stoppages SSI with caretakers convenience <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> po<strong>in</strong>tsdistance <strong>of</strong> households from public <strong>water</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts SSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps acceptance <strong>of</strong> taps <strong>in</strong> placetime <strong>of</strong> queu<strong>in</strong>g / <strong>of</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>g a bucketuse <strong>of</strong> the <strong>water</strong> facilities and for what purposesSSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps meet<strong>in</strong>g with women SSI with users <strong>of</strong> tapstaps <strong>in</strong>spection% <strong>of</strong> household us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>water</strong> facilitiesSSI with users <strong>of</strong> tapsrepartition <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> SSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> used SSI with users <strong>of</strong> taps Realisation <strong>of</strong> non-scaled map<strong>of</strong> the <strong>water</strong> facilitiescollect data from basel<strong>in</strong>esurveycollect data from basel<strong>in</strong>esurveycollect data from basel<strong>in</strong>esurveyquantity <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> resources available(rate <strong>of</strong> pump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>take)per capita <strong>water</strong> resources availableat WTPturbidity, colour, taste, odourpotential risk <strong>of</strong> faecal / bacteriologicalcontam<strong>in</strong>ationoccurrence <strong>of</strong> outbreaksfrequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>supply</strong>occurrence <strong>of</strong> congestion <strong>in</strong> the <strong>water</strong>po<strong>in</strong>tssatisfactory pressure at <strong>water</strong> po<strong>in</strong>tsAppendix BMethodology – Criteria & Indicators (1)
Change language