Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES

Criteria of evaluation - Indicatorsassociated Values Target or suggested value Source of the targetuse of the water facilities and for what purposes% of household using the water facilities < 2% no specific targets -repartition of the use of water all domestic purposes no specific targets -volume of water usednot representative as water is not flowingregularlyno specific targets -operation and maintenancepresence of effective caretakers at theCarter & al. (1999)yescaretaker fulfilling their assigned jobstreatment plantwater quality monitoring recordsproportion of unutilised water pointsyes, but hardly exploitable24% in total, 50% of public taps and 20% ofindividual connectionsurveillance should provide information usefulfor management decisionssystem infrastructure fully functionalduration to repair/replace spare parts up to months, some never repaired no more than 7 days a year of downtimesfrequency of shortage of power supply, eithergenerator or electricity supplymanagement and financingdailyno more than 7 days a year of downtimeslegal structure of the WCA no CBO needs legal ownershipregular meeting yes committee should be meeting regularly% of fee collection revenue collection in an effective waycost recovery of O&Mindicators not adequate for the moment asWCA does not yet own the water system, butrevenue collection in an effective wayrelevant for later evaluationback support from governmental/nongovernmentalagencyequityimplication of women in WCAimplication of the poorest household in theWCAimplication of the minority tribes membersproportion of public taps working compared toindividual connectionlownot evaluatedvery low17% of public taps and 40% of individualconnections working appropriately (high ormoderate pressure)the back stopping agency shall be in regularand effective contact with the communityachieve equity in all aspects of serviceprovisionHoward (2002)Carter & al. (1999)Schouten & Moriarty(2003)Carter & al. (1999)Carter & al. (1999)Appendix DResults – Criteria & Indicators (2)