Evaluation of water supply system Case study in Naka ... - ENGEES

Preparation of field researchAdaptation on the fieldCriteria of evaluation - Indicators associatedoperation and maintenanceMeans of verification -Methods plannedDone?Alternatives/complementarydata collection in-fieldpresence of effective caretakers at the treatment planttreatment plant survey SSI with caretakers water quality monitoring recordscollect water quality monitoringdocuments of WTP interview of Water Board staffproportion of unutilised water points taps inspection SSI with users of tapsduration to repair/replace spare partsSSI with users of taps SSI with caretakers frequency of operation work (treatment and pumping)WTP survey management and financinglegal structure of the WCAcheck legal attestation ofassociation regular meeting book record check % of fee collection book record check cost recovery of O&M book record checkback support from governmental/non-governmental SSI with WCA executiveagencycommitteeequitycheck record of womenmemberships implication of women in the WCAobservation during WCAmeetings meeting with women implication of the poorest household in the WCA SSI with users of taps SSI with community membersSSI with users of tapsNew indicators/criteria chosen toadapt the local situationfrequency of shortage of powersupply, either generator or electricitysupplyindicators not adequate as WCA doesnot yet own the water system, butrelevant for later evaluationimplication of the minority tribesmembersproportion of public taps workingcompared to individual connectionAppendix BMethodology – Criteria & Indicators (2)