12.07.2015 Views

Socio-economic Baseline Survey of Chittagong Hill Tracts - chtdf

Socio-economic Baseline Survey of Chittagong Hill Tracts - chtdf

Socio-economic Baseline Survey of Chittagong Hill Tracts - chtdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HDRC<strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>economic</strong> <strong>Baseline</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chittagong</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Tracts</strong>85As evident from the survey, almost all households have multiple sources <strong>of</strong> income (Table11.1). Although the cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> all reported sources <strong>of</strong> household income variesdepending upon communities, it ranges between 100% (implies that the households onaverage have only one source <strong>of</strong> income) and 255% (2.5 sources <strong>of</strong> income), with 154% forall CHT. There are instances where for large number <strong>of</strong> households, there are multiplesources <strong>of</strong> income within some <strong>of</strong> the broader categories, such as agriculture.It is revealed that rural CHT households are heavily dependent on agriculture as their source<strong>of</strong> income. Almost all the CHT households have at least one agriculture related incomesource, and some <strong>of</strong> them earn from multiple sources related with agriculture. Thus,cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> household income from the agriculture related sources is about117% (about 1.2 sources on average per household) for all rural CHT households. On thewhole, the indigenous households are more related with agriculture than the Bangalees. Thecumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> households who have reported income from the agriculture relatedsource is about 136%, while the same for the Bangalees is 96%. Among the indigenouscommunities, the Chakmas, the Khyangs, the Marmas, and the Tanchangyas are moreinvolved with agriculture as a whole as compared to the others. The cumulative percentagerelated to income from the same sources ranges between 143% and 173% (i.e., 1.43 and 1.73sources per household).Table 11.1: Reported Cumulative Income Source <strong>of</strong> household by Communities (%)Sources <strong>of</strong>IncomeIndigenouspeoples: AllBawmChakChakmaKhyangKhumiLushaiMarmaMroPangkhuaTanchangyaTripuraBangaleeAll CHTAgriculturerelated135.9 96.9 100 173 172.4 97 83.7 163.4 95.3 89.9 143.5 90.1 95.7 117.5Business 7.2 3.7 10.2 9.5 6.4 5.0 5.5 6.0 3.2 4.5 5.1 2.0 10.5 8.6Wage (nonfarm) & 15.9 4.7 36.7 20.4 27.7 2.3 3.2 17.3 1.4 3.6 5.0 8.5 11.8 14.1salariedTraditional 6.7 21.3 12.2 11.4 29.8 4.3 3.9 3.8 1.4 9.5 8.4 2.0 2.2 4.7Others 9.0 3.6 2.0 16 19.1 0.6 4.3 4.7 6.0 0.5 3.4 3.0 8.6 9.0CumulativeTotal174.7 130.2 161.1 230.3 255.4 109.2 100.6 195.2 107.3 108 165.4 105.6 128.8 153.9Wage (non-farm) and salaried category <strong>of</strong> household income, very remotely, follows theagriculture related category with 14% for all CHT households and 16% <strong>of</strong> IP households. Forsome communities the traditional category <strong>of</strong> income earning sources closely follows thenon-farm wage and salaried category or even the earlier source is in the second level which isfollowed by the latter. For example, for the Chakmas, the respective cumulative percentage<strong>of</strong> non-farm wage and salaried category, and traditional category <strong>of</strong> reported sources <strong>of</strong>household income are 20% and 11% respectively, while among the Khyangs the same are28% and 30% respectively. The proportion <strong>of</strong> business category and other income sourcescategory is reportedly low.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!