12.07.2015 Views

Socio-economic Baseline Survey of Chittagong Hill Tracts - chtdf

Socio-economic Baseline Survey of Chittagong Hill Tracts - chtdf

Socio-economic Baseline Survey of Chittagong Hill Tracts - chtdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HDRC<strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>economic</strong> <strong>Baseline</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chittagong</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Tracts</strong>16422.2.3 Relationship among different indigenous communitiesRegarding the present state <strong>of</strong> relationship amongdifferent indigenous communities, 30% <strong>of</strong> therespondents have reported that there is a “friendlyrelationship” while slight more than three-fifthshave reported that that it is “almost friendly”.About 8% <strong>of</strong> the respondents have reported thatthe relationship is “not friendly” while about 1%has reported that there is “hostile relationship”(see Annex Table 22.7).22.2.4 Relationship between Bangalee and Indigenous CommunitiesRegarding the relationshipbetween Bangalees anddifferent indigenouscommunities, these two groupshave given contradictorystatements. While about onefifth<strong>of</strong> the Bangalees havereported that there is a“friendly relationship betweenthe Bangalee and theindigenous”, only 5% <strong>of</strong> theindigenous communitiesreported the same. Householdsreporting the relationship being“almost friendly” constitute 53% <strong>of</strong> Bangalee and 39% <strong>of</strong> indigenous while those reporting“not friendly” constitute 25% <strong>of</strong> Bangalee and 34% <strong>of</strong> indigenous. Those reporting therelationship being “hostile” are only 2% <strong>of</strong> Bangalee and 21% <strong>of</strong> indigenous. It implies thatthe Bangalee views the relationship being “friendly” and “almost friendly” while theindigenous people views it “not friendly” and “hostile” (see Annex Table 22.8).22.3 Constraints to PeaceRespondents have mentioned a total <strong>of</strong>eleven factors acting as constraints to peacein the CHT. These are: communal threat(reported by 81%), extortion (80%),abduction (78%), armed conflict (78%),ransom (77%), restricted movement (75%),lack <strong>of</strong> trust among communities (74%),insecurity <strong>of</strong> women (73%), fear <strong>of</strong> evictionfrom own land (73%), and fear <strong>of</strong> insecurity<strong>of</strong> children (67%) (see Annex Table 22.9).Almostfriendly39.1%Friendly5.2%HostileNot21.2%friendly34.4%Reported by Indigenous People N=1,786Figure 22.2: Household reported relationship amongdifferent indigenous communitiesAlmost friendly62.4%Friendly 29.5%Figure 22.3: Household reported relationship between Bangalee and differentindigenous communitiesHostile0.6%Not friendly7.5%Almostfriendly53.3 Friendly19.9%Hostile1.5%Notfriendly25.3%Reported by Bangalee N=1,452Figure 22.4: Constraints to peace in CHT amongindigenous communitiesAbductionRansomExtortionArmed conflictCommunal threatRestricted movementInsecurity <strong>of</strong> womenInsecurity <strong>of</strong> childrenLack <strong>of</strong> trust among communitiesLack <strong>of</strong> interaction among communitiesFear <strong>of</strong> eviction from own land66.765.578.276.679.578.274.872.773.872.680.7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!