<strong>Fusion</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>Shear Alfvén wavecontinuous spectrumThe work was done incollaboration with thePhysics Department of theUniversity of Pisa and thein the presence of aDepartment of Physics andmagnetic island Astronomy at UCI. Theshear Alfvén wavecontinuous spectrum iscalculated for finite-β tokamak equilibria in thepresence of a finite-size magnetic island, adopting aslab model and constant-ψ near the correspondingrational surface. The beta-induced Alfvén eigenmodecontinuum accumulation point (BAE-CAP) [1.22-1.24]is found to be shifted in space from the rationalsurface of the island to the separatrix flux surfaceposition (labelled ψ=ψ sx in fig. 1.11), while theaccumulation points at the O pointfrequency f BAE remains the same. Splitting betweenthe frequencies of the odd and even modes becauseof the non-uniformity of the magnetic field along the field lines was also discussed. The most remarkablefeature is the presence of new continuum accumulation points at the O-point of the island (ψ 0 ), whichdepend on the toroidal mode number n, and thereby give rise to gaps in the continuous spectrum andregions free of continuum damping. This fact could make the existence of new magnetic-island-inducedAlfvén eigenmodes (MiAEs) possible, excited via wave-particle resonances, provided the island size besufficiently wide with respect to the mode radial localisation. The MiAE-CAP frequencies are given byf 2MiAE3MiAE2MiAE1BAEn=5n=4n=3MiAE-CAPsn=2n=1n=3n=2n=1BAE-CAP0 0.5 1 1.5ψ/ψ sxFig. 1.11 - Continuous spectrum frequencybranches for several n-modes (M=10-2). TheBAE continuum accumulation point isshown at the separatrix with the new MiAEf MiAE−CAP = f BAE1+ q 0 s B 2isl,0 f A n 2B 2 pol f BAE, (1)where q 0 , s, and B pol are respectively the values of the safety factor, shear and poloidal magnetic fieldcalculated at the rational surface of the island, B isl,0 is the magnetic island amplitude and f A is the Alfvénfrequency: f A =v A /(2πqR) with v A =B/√4πρ and ρ the mass density. For small-amplitude magnetic islandsthe scaling is linear with the amplitude, and the approximate value is2007 Progress Report20f MiAE−CAP ≅ f BAE + q 0 s B 2 isl,0 f A n 22 B pol f BAE. (2)The regime of validity of the linear approximation is given byB isl,0n 2 √β/M) even forfinite-β plasmas, where M=q 0 sB isl,0 /B pol . In the case of low-βplasmas, it is worthwhile noting that the order of magnitude of[1.22] M.S. Chu et al., Phys. Fluids B4, 3713(1992)[1.23] A.D. Turnbull et al., Phys. Fluids B5,2546 (1993)[1.24] F. Zonca, L. Chen and R.A. Santoro,Plasma Phys. Control. <strong>Fusion</strong> 38, 2011(1996)[1.25] P. Buratti et al., Nucl. <strong>Fusion</strong> 45, 1446(2005)[1.26] P. Smeulders et al., Proc. of the 29 thEPS Conference on Plasma Physicsand Controlled <strong>Fusion</strong> (Montreaux2002), on line at http:// epsppd.epfl.ch/Montreux/ pdf/D5_016.pdf[1.27] S.V. Annibaldi, F. Zonca and P. Buratti,Plasma Phys. Control. <strong>Fusion</strong> 49, 475(2007)[1.28] O. Zimmermann et al., Proc. of the32 nd EPS Conference on Plasma
1. Magnetic Confinement2007 Progress Reportthe island-induced frequency shift can be comparable with the BAE-CAP frequency itself.Modes in the BAE frequency range have been observed in FTU [1.25-1.26] in the presence of an(m,n)=(–2,–1) magnetic island. A theoretical analysis showed that they can be interpreted as BAE modes,when thermal ion transit resonances and finite ion Larmor radius effects are accounted for [1.27], in thesmall magnetic island amplitude limit. In fact, their measured frequencies were found to depend on themagnetic island amplitude as well, with the same scaling as in equation (2) in the magnetic field. Themodes were observed only when the magnetic island size was over a certain critical threshold. Similarobservations have been reported by TEXTOR [1.28-1.29].Due to the dependence of the MiAE-CAP frequency on mode numbers and the magnetic island size, thepossibility of using equations (1) and (2) as novel magnetic island diagnostics is evident.To establish whether the physical mechanism involved in an electron ITB is theModelling and same as in an ion ITB, direct heating of the plasma ions by ICRH in the “minorityanalysis of ICRH heating regime” ( 3 He minority) without neutral beam injection (NBI) was providedin an experiment on JET [1.30]. Since under this scheme the available ICRH powerheating experiments is very small (both as absolute power released by the plant and total powerin JET ITB regimes provided to the ions), very accurate experiment preparation was mandatory andrequired using a full wave code to study the ICRH coupling and absorption.The calculation performed to analyse the previous experiment, based on the useof the 2D full wave code TORIC, was improved. These new evaluations were used to re-visit the oldexperimental data and to prepare the next JET experiment. Moreover, TORIC was coupled with a code,which solves the 2D steady-state quasi-linear Fokker-Planck (SSQLFP) equation, to establish redistributionof the power from the minority to the principal species of the plasma (electrons and majority ions) bycollisions. This new and more complete analysis was applied to the previous experiments (f=3 MHz,≈4 MW of ICRH), showing that the best 3 He minority concentration, which maximises the minority heating,is around 6-7%. The fraction of power, which is directly absorbed by the minority, is about 70% of thetotal power, while the electrons absorb the remaining 30%. Quasi-linear calculations show that the powertransfer from these energetic tails to the bulk ions is around 90%, so the global power absorbed by ionsis less than 65% of the total launched power. Although transport calculations, which use the above powerdeposition profiles as the starting point, have shown that there is a reduction in ion conductivityat the barrier location (χ i =1 m 2 /s), the power coupled with the ions is too marginal to observeany macroscopic effect on the barrier formation.Physics (Tarragona 2005), on line athttp://epsppd.epfl.ch/Tarragona/pdf/P5_059.pdf[1.29] P. Buratti et al., Proc. of the 32 nd EPSConference on Plasma Physics(Tarragona 2005), on line at http://epsppd.epfl.ch/Tarragona/pdf/P5_055.pdf[1.30] F. Crisanti et al., Proc. of the 20 th IAEA<strong>Fusion</strong> Energy Conference (Villamoura,2004), on line at http://wwwnaweb.iaea.org/napc/physics/fec/fec2004/papers/EX_p2-1.pdf[1.31] S. Briguglio, et al., Particle simulationsof bursting Alfvén modes in JT-60U,Presented at the 48 th Annual Meetingof the APS Division of Plasma Physics,Phys. Plasmas 14, 055904 (2007)Invited paperFollowing the experience obtainedParticle simulation of in simulating JT-60U dischargesneutral-beam-heated [1.31] with the HMGC, theinvestigation of energetic ionDIII-D discharges transport and nonlinear Alfvénicfluctuations in present-dayexperiments was focussed on the DIII-D device, in acollaboration with UCI and General Atomics, San Diego.In reversed-shear beam-heated DIII-D discharges, a largediscrepancy between the expected (from classical deposition)and measured energetic particle radial density profile has21