Endnotes1 Oficina Central de Estadísticas e Informática, El Censo 90 en Bolívar (Caracas,Venezuela: OCEI, 1995).2 The trend towards urbanization is strongly linked to periodic booms in the oilsector. See S. Wunder, “Oil Wealth and the Fate of the Forest: Venezuela,”Unpublished CIFOR Draft (Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2001), pp. 38-39.3 Oficina Central de Estadísticas e Informática, El Censo 90 en Bolívar (Caracas,Venezuela: OCEI, 1995).4 Oficina Central de Estadísticas e Informática, El Censo Indígena de 1992(Caracas, Venezuela: OCEI, 1993), pp. 28-32.5 M. Miranda et al., All That Glitters is Not Gold: Balancing Conservation andDevelopment in Venezuela’s Frontier Forests (Washington, DC: WorldResources Institute, 1998), p. 9.6 Banco Central de Venezuela. n.d. “Indicadores Economicos: Producto InternoBruto.” Online at: http://www.bcv.org.ve/pdf/712.pdf (June 27, 2001).7 M. Miranda et al., All That Glitters is Not Gold: Balancing Conservation andDevelopment in Venezuela’s Frontier Forests (Washington, DC: WorldResources Institute, 1998) p. 11.8 Ibídem, pp. 7-8.9 Government of Venezuela (GOV). Gaceta Oficial de la República de VenezuelaNo. 30.809 (Oct. 1, 1975).10 A National Assembly, whose members were elected in July 2000, subsequentlyreplaced the Constitutional Assembly.11 See C. Delgado, “Este semestre habrá un nuevo decreto para la reserva forestalde Imataca,” El Nacional (March 17, 2000); M. Tabuas, “Min-Ambiente llamó aderrotar el neoliberalismo ecológico,” El Nacional (February 6, 1999); C.Delgado B., “Avanza la explotación en Imataca,” El Nacional (June 24, 1999).12 O. Ortegano, “Nueva Política Forestal: El Manejo Integral Comunitario delBosque,” in SEFORVEN: Revista de la Dirección del Recurso Forestal No. 16.(Caracas, Venezuela: MARN, Oct. 2000), p. 5.13 Government of Venezuela (GOV), Decreto 369, “Decreto con Rango y Fuerza deLey Orgánica de la Administración Central,” Gaceta Oficial de la República deVenezuela Article 33, No. 36.807 (Oct. 14, 1999).14 Ibídem.15 FAO, Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (Rome, Italy: FAO, 2001), FRA 2000Global Tables, Table 4, Online at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jsp.16 A. Catalán, Dirección General de Recursos Forestales, MARN, personal communication,June 29, 2001.17 O. Huber, personal communication, July 11, 2001.74
18 Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales (MARNR), BalanceAmbiental de Venezuela, Apéndice 1996 (Caracas, Venezuela: MARNR, 1996),p. 12-13. The estimates published for the remaining 10 states are not comparableto the 1982 forest cover estimates published for the additional states. S.Wunder, “Oil Wealth and the Fate of the Forest: Venezuela,” UnpublishedCIFOR Draft (Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2001), p. 7.19 Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables (MARNR),Balance Ambiental de Venezuela, Apéndice 1996 (Caracas, Venezuela:MARNR, 1996), pp. 7, 11, 13.20 The government deforestation statistics do not take into account an additional10 states. However, these states are known to have high deforestation rates,making net reforestation unlikely. See J.P. Veillon, “Las deforestaciones en losLlanos Occidentales de Venezuela desde 1950 hasta 1975,” in Conservación delos Bosques Húmedos de Venezuela. L. Hamilton et al., eds. (Caracas,Venezuela: Sierra Club/Consejo de Bienestar Rural, 1977), p. 100-103; A.Catalán, El Proceso de Deforestación en Venezuela entre 1975-1988 (Caracas,Venezuela: MARNR, 1989), p. 19-22.21 C.S. Harcourt and J.A. Sayer, eds. The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests:The Americas (New York: IUCN, 1996), p. 315.22 J.P. Veillon, “Las Deforestaciones en Los Llanos Occidentales de VenezuelaDesde 1950 hasta 1975,” in Conservación de los Bosques Húmedos deVenezuela. L. Hamilton et al., eds. (Caracas, Venezuela: Sierra Club/Consejo deBienestar Rural, 1977), p. 101-103.23 A. Catalán, El Processo de Deforestación en Venezuela entre 1975-1988(Caracas, Venezuela: MARNR, 1989), p. 21.24 MARN, “Informe de la Situación Forestal de Venezuela,” Revista Seforven:Revista de la Dirección del Recurso Forestal No. 16 (October 2000), p. 8.25 A.O. Castillo, “Áreas Bajo Régimen de Administración Especial por Figura”(Documento Sujeto a Revisión). Dirección de Ordenación del Territorio.(Caracas, Venezuela: Dirección General Sectorial de Planificación yOrdenación del Ambiente, MARN, 2001); M. Bevilacqua, “Áreas Bajo Régimende Administración Especial,” in Biodiversidad en Venezuela. M. Aguilera etal., eds. (Caracas, Venezuela: CONICIT-Fundación Polar, in press).26 The percent of forests protected depends on whether one excludes the area ofoverlap between strictly protected areas. See Annex 1 for details.27 Potential conflicts of use may also occur in the case of overlap between protectedzones and forest reserves, if logging results in forest degradation.Although protected zones do not explicitly prohibit logging, forest degradationthat could accompany these activities (see Chapter 4, Question 5) would be inconflict with the objectives of a protected zone. For the sake of consistency, wehave not included this potential conflict in our analysis of overlapping protectedareas, nor is it included in Map 6.28 For a history of indigenous occupation of the Imataca Forest Reserve area, seeA. Mansutti Rodríguez et al., “Diagnóstico de los conflictos socio-ambientalesen Imataca: Líneas estratégicas de un programa para el resguardo y la consoli-75
- Page 2 and 3:
The State of Venezuela’s ForestsA
- Page 5:
PresentationMan has become increasi
- Page 9 and 10:
ForewordForests help to slow global
- Page 11 and 12:
AcknowledgmentsGlobal Forest Watch
- Page 13 and 14:
Mining ............................
- Page 15 and 16:
6. Actual and Potential Conflicts B
- Page 18 and 19:
Key FindingsVenezuela is still home
- Page 20 and 21:
However, the forests of the Guayana
- Page 22 and 23:
2Political and Administrative Bound
- Page 24:
MAP 2Settlements in the Forests of
- Page 27 and 28:
In 1998, the Venezuelan Forest Serv
- Page 29 and 30:
Legal Instrument Year RelevanceDecr
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2Forest Cover and Protectio
- Page 33 and 34:
13Forest CoverMAP 3Data on forest c
- Page 35 and 36:
• Lack of consistency in results.
- Page 37 and 38:
17Areas Strictly Protected for Cons
- Page 39 and 40:
Areas protected for natural resourc
- Page 41 and 42:
Actual and Potential Conflicts Betw
- Page 43 and 44: Capacity to Manage Protected Areas
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 3Non-Extractive Value of Fo
- Page 47 and 48: Wildlife Species Richness in the Gu
- Page 49 and 50: Threatened and Endemic Species by S
- Page 51 and 52: At least thirteen plants and animal
- Page 53 and 54: The capture and collection of parro
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 4Forest Development TrendsV
- Page 57 and 58: Imports, Exports, and National Prod
- Page 59 and 60: Industrial Wood Production, 1980-19
- Page 61 and 62: • In 1997, royalties and fees com
- Page 63 and 64: Status of Logging Concessions in th
- Page 65 and 66: Irregularities in Logging Concessio
- Page 67 and 68: Low extraction rates in the Guayana
- Page 69 and 70: The Guayana region lacks a transpar
- Page 71 and 72: The capacity for regeneration of co
- Page 73 and 74: MiningWhat is the relative importan
- Page 75 and 76: Venezuelan Gold and Diamond Product
- Page 77 and 78: • Concession owners are required
- Page 79 and 80: Foreign Mining Companies with Holdi
- Page 81 and 82: By nature, mining is a speculative
- Page 83 and 84: signs of contamination, 97 and anot
- Page 85 and 86: SettlementsHow are settlement patte
- Page 87 and 88: What is the impact of population ch
- Page 89 and 90: y these actors. In addition, becaus
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 5ConclusionsGlobal Forest W
- Page 93: Providing Better Information for In
- Page 97 and 98: 37 MARN, Boletín Estadístico Fore
- Page 99 and 100: 62 R. Posada, “Algunos aspectos s
- Page 101 and 102: 83 Government of Venezuela (GOV), D
- Page 103 and 104: 103 Legislation does not define sta
- Page 105 and 106: Methodology:• Data on the locatio
- Page 107 and 108: • TREES from ATSR onboard the ERS
- Page 109 and 110: Maps 4-6, Figures 2-4Venezuela’s
- Page 111 and 112: • There are differences between t
- Page 113 and 114: Wildlife Restricted to Forests of t
- Page 115 and 116: Threatened Animals Used by Indigeno
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4: Forest Development Trend
- Page 119 and 120: Note: There are many inconsistencie
- Page 121 and 122: Annual Cutting Plans (Executed)Area
- Page 123 and 124: Management Area (ha) Contract Years
- Page 125 and 126: Table Sources:• Concession manage
- Page 127 and 128: Price of Gold, 1975-2000 (Figure 20
- Page 129 and 130: Methodology (Figure 23, Table 11, M
- Page 131 and 132: Change in Selected Indigenous Popul
- Page 133 and 134: iar with forest issues in Venezuela
- Page 135 and 136: Gydris Adrián Comisión Especial p
- Page 137 and 138: Ortegano, O. “Nueva Política For
- Page 139 and 140: Chapter 3: Non-timber Forest Produc
- Page 141 and 142: Dessene, P., and S. Strhal. “Situ
- Page 143 and 144: Hernández, L., P. Williams, R. Azu
- Page 145 and 146:
Ojasti, J. “Fauna silvestre del e
- Page 147 and 148:
Técnica Minera C.A. Inventario de
- Page 149 and 150:
Nepstad, D., et al. “Large-scale
- Page 151 and 152:
Government Industry Task Force on t
- Page 153 and 154:
All data presented in this report a
- Page 155:
GLOBAL FOREST WATCH (GFW)WORLD RESO