and authorities will have <strong>to</strong> take cognisance <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong> their policies andprocedures.• It was rare <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d schools with written policies on gender equality, even amongstthose schools recommended <strong>to</strong> the team as worthy <strong>of</strong> study <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> goodpractice. Schools should discuss this situation and move <strong>to</strong>wards development <strong>of</strong>policies <strong>to</strong> address gender-sensitive matters.• The most successful <strong>in</strong>itiatives observed by the research team were <strong>in</strong> pre-5 andprimary schools. This good practice could be more widely shared, and theimplications worked <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> primary practice <strong>in</strong> general.• Where development <strong>of</strong> a gender-related <strong>in</strong>itiative was shared between schools,there was a greater chance <strong>of</strong> progression and cont<strong>in</strong>uity occurr<strong>in</strong>g. Primary andsecondary schools should be encouraged <strong>to</strong> cooperate <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong>strategies <strong>to</strong> address gender <strong>in</strong>equalities with, ideally, national and local authoritysupport through policy and staff development.• The most successful practice engaged all stakeholders, particularly parents.Schools should discuss with their communities how parents and otherstakeholders might be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g, development and implementation<strong>of</strong> strategies <strong>to</strong> address gender <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Scottish</strong> schools.• Where staff development was most effective, it was <strong>in</strong> situations where the staffhad a degree <strong>of</strong> ownership and were supported by practical guidance and advice.Schools and authorities should encourage and facilitate staff developmentactivities related <strong>to</strong> gender issues, and providers <strong>of</strong> staff development, such asauthorities and universities, should be encouraged <strong>to</strong> enable this development <strong>to</strong>happen.__________________________________________________________________________________<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong> <strong>to</strong> vii University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde<strong>Address</strong> <strong>Gender</strong> <strong>Inequalities</strong>and University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow
CHAPTER ONE THE STUDYRecent research <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> gender <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> schools (see the Literature <strong>Review</strong>, pp13 ff.)has tended <strong>to</strong> focus on the underachievement <strong>of</strong> boys, particularly <strong>in</strong> the early years <strong>of</strong>secondary school. Prior <strong>to</strong> that, researchers were more concerned <strong>to</strong> understand girls’lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement and underachievement <strong>in</strong> specific curricular areas, such as thesciences.In 1996, the Equal Opportunities Commission published Education Reform and <strong>Gender</strong>Equality <strong>in</strong> Schools (Arnot et al, 1996). This was followed by a series <strong>of</strong> studies aimed atga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g greater understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the issues, the identification <strong>of</strong> contribu<strong>to</strong>ry fac<strong>to</strong>rs andthe evaluation <strong>of</strong> strategies <strong>to</strong> address <strong>in</strong>equalities such as access, achievement andopportunities. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicated that, amongst other th<strong>in</strong>gs, the maleunderachievement phenomenon was not necessarily a class-related matter (Power et al,1998). Other commenta<strong>to</strong>rs have argued that gender identities <strong>in</strong>tersect with other forms<strong>of</strong> identity and, <strong>in</strong> particular, with ‘race’ and class identities; creat<strong>in</strong>g a complex situationwhere some social and ethnic groups are multiply disadvantaged <strong>in</strong> school sett<strong>in</strong>gs(Archer and Yamashita, 2003; Jackson, 2002; Reay, 2002). The complex ways <strong>in</strong> whichthey <strong>in</strong>teract make it difficult <strong>to</strong> identify strategies that will address <strong>in</strong>equalities, and <strong>to</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>e which are effective <strong>in</strong> so do<strong>in</strong>g.This report presents the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> a study designed <strong>to</strong> review the research <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> genderrelated<strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> schools. It also determ<strong>in</strong>es the extent <strong>to</strong> which <strong>Scottish</strong> schoolshave adopted strategies <strong>to</strong> address these, and how effective they have been.The study was funded by the <strong>Scottish</strong> Executive Education Department (SEED) and<strong>in</strong>volved researchers from both the Universities <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde and Glasgow. It wasdesigned <strong>in</strong> three overlapp<strong>in</strong>g phases. The first consisted <strong>of</strong> a substantial review <strong>of</strong> theliterature; the second <strong>in</strong>volved a survey <strong>of</strong> the provision for tackl<strong>in</strong>g gender-related issues<strong>in</strong> local authority policy; and the third consisted <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> case studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scottish</strong>schools where gender-related strategies were <strong>in</strong> use. The first phase provided aframework aga<strong>in</strong>st which strategies could be analysed, while the third provided evidence<strong>of</strong> their impact.The specific aims <strong>of</strong> the study were <strong>to</strong>:• develop an understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the extent and causes <strong>of</strong> gender <strong>in</strong>equalities,particularly <strong>in</strong> atta<strong>in</strong>ment, school experiences and expectations <strong>in</strong> Scotlandcompared <strong>to</strong> elsewhere;• document the current practices used by <strong>Scottish</strong> educational authorities andschools (publicly-funded primary and secondary schools) <strong>to</strong> address gender<strong>in</strong>equalities;• identify the effect <strong>of</strong> these practices on gender atta<strong>in</strong>ment, self-esteem,perceptions <strong>of</strong> gender roles, subject choices, career aspirations, access <strong>to</strong>vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and so on, identify<strong>in</strong>g ‘which girls’ and ‘which boys’ areaffected; and• highlight examples <strong>of</strong> good practice <strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g gender <strong>in</strong>equality issuesthrough case studies (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g publicly-funded schools at primary andsecondary levels).The methods used <strong>in</strong>volved the collection <strong>of</strong> both quantitative and qualitative data, aswell as explor<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g knowledge base through the review <strong>of</strong> the literature. Theaim was <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> both an overview <strong>of</strong> the national position and <strong>to</strong> get at the experiences,aspirations and perceptions <strong>of</strong> pupils, teachers and representatives <strong>of</strong> educational policy-______________________________________________________________________________________<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong> <strong>to</strong> 1 University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde<strong>Address</strong> <strong>Gender</strong> <strong>Inequalities</strong>and University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSEXECUTIVE S
- Page 5 and 6: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIntroductionThe Re
- Page 7 and 8: Staff and management in most school
- Page 9: 6. Management and whole school pers
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF THE LITERATUR
- Page 15 and 16: 2.3 Causes of gender inequalityA ra
- Page 17 and 18: Archer and Yamashita (2003) argue t
- Page 19 and 20: ii. Assessment practicesNational mo
- Page 21 and 22: Further efforts to ensure ‘effect
- Page 23 and 24: Skelton (2001) argues that the basi
- Page 25 and 26: were still highly gendered. Further
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER THREE SURVEY OF LOCAL AUTHO
- Page 29 and 30: curriculum structures and lifelong
- Page 31 and 32: ‘Getting the best out of Boys’
- Page 33 and 34: 4.2 Early literacyLiteracy, or, mor
- Page 35 and 36: that it was concerned, at least in
- Page 37 and 38: 4.3 Self-concept and esteemA number
- Page 39 and 40: to the boys, animal print designs a
- Page 41 and 42: parents and what they wanted. Overa
- Page 43 and 44: was a thrust in the policy towards
- Page 45 and 46: School 1In the first school, non-de
- Page 47 and 48: For pupils, there were some common
- Page 49 and 50: Staff interviewed thought that a pa
- Page 51 and 52: The initiative had not been evaluat
- Page 53 and 54: indicated that he believed there wa
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSIONThe review o
- Page 57 and 58: Pupils were particularly aware of g
- Page 59 and 60: differences in the ways that boys a
- Page 61 and 62:
Burn, E (2001) Do boys need male pr
- Page 63 and 64:
Lloyd, G (ed.) (2005) Problem Girls
- Page 65 and 66:
Rowe, K, Nix, PJ and Tepper, G (199
- Page 67 and 68:
APPENDIX 1 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LOCAL
- Page 69 and 70:
6. Would you expect any written pol
- Page 71 and 72:
C. Strategies to address gender ine
- Page 73 and 74:
Local authority161718Strategy/Area
- Page 75 and 76:
Focus group schedule: pupilsThe the
- Page 77 and 78:
4. ImpactHas the project made any d
- Page 79 and 80:
Policy origin of the initiativeLoca
- Page 81 and 82:
Relationship with other strategiesE
- Page 83 and 84:
Section 4Focus Group - ParentsGener