Example <strong>of</strong> evaluation completed by parents <strong>in</strong> one school us<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>to</strong>ry sacksFigure 4. 1: Cover <strong>of</strong> the evaluation leafletFigure 4.2: Inside <strong>of</strong> the evaluation leaflet______________________________________________________________________________________<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong> <strong>to</strong> 26 University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde<strong>Address</strong> <strong>Gender</strong> <strong>Inequalities</strong>and University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow
4.3 Self-concept and esteemA number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives designed <strong>to</strong> tackle self concept and break down genderstereotypes, <strong>in</strong> parents as well as children, were identified <strong>in</strong> the pre-5 sec<strong>to</strong>r. Most<strong>in</strong>volved parents and were <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>to</strong> tackle, gently, gender stereotypes with<strong>in</strong> thecommunity. One local authority and one <strong>of</strong> its nurseries were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the case studyphase.i. BackgroundOne city, with a his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> deprivation and relative poverty concentrated <strong>in</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>gschemes and estates, had developed a general <strong>in</strong>clusion strategy which <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>to</strong> address parent<strong>in</strong>g skills. Initially aimed at young parents and those liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>deprived areas, the parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiative had progressively focused on the role <strong>of</strong> fathers.The key aims were <strong>to</strong> develop parent<strong>in</strong>g skills and improve parent-child relationships,with issues <strong>of</strong> self esteem and confidence important, particularly regard<strong>in</strong>g men. Thisprogramme, the Parents Services Initiative (PSI), is not l<strong>in</strong>ked directly <strong>to</strong> the schoolsystem, but operates on Saturday morn<strong>in</strong>gs and early even<strong>in</strong>gs and tries <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>volveparents and pre-school children work<strong>in</strong>g on shared activities. It began <strong>in</strong> one, particularlydeprived, estate and was then extended city-wide.One nursery school with<strong>in</strong> the same local authority was visited. In addition <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the PSI, staff had developed a number <strong>of</strong> small strategies <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>to</strong> openup choices and experiences <strong>to</strong> the pupils, particularly boys. It was <strong>in</strong> a council hous<strong>in</strong>gestate with high unemployment rates amongst fathers and a degree <strong>of</strong> deprivation.ii. Initial impetus and fund<strong>in</strong>gWith a his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> deprivation and disadvantage, the city established an Early Years andChild Care Team (EYCCT) <strong>to</strong> address aspects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>clusion agenda and set up the PSI<strong>in</strong> 2000. The Initiative <strong>in</strong>volves the education and social work services as well as thevoluntary and private sec<strong>to</strong>rs. There is a partnership steer<strong>in</strong>g group, chaired by theDirec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Education and with representation from all <strong>of</strong> the partners. TwoDevelopment Workers have been seconded from their posts <strong>in</strong> school and social work <strong>to</strong>support the Initiative. They plan, consult, generate ideas and carry plans through, <strong>of</strong>tenrunn<strong>in</strong>g the sessions and workshops themselves. They have begun <strong>to</strong> take on an advisoryrole, help<strong>in</strong>g others <strong>to</strong> develop similar programmes <strong>of</strong> their own. It is funded by the city.While schools and nurseries made attempts <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>volve fathers <strong>in</strong> events such as <strong>in</strong>ductiondays, few got <strong>in</strong>volved. This was caus<strong>in</strong>g concern. At the same time, a male social workstudent was placed with the team and he was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g with the fathers <strong>in</strong>ways that would support the development <strong>of</strong> parent-child relationships.The headteacher <strong>in</strong> the nursery school was aware <strong>of</strong> the PSI but described the <strong>in</strong>itiativesthat she had taken with<strong>in</strong> the school as be<strong>in</strong>g triggered by her observations <strong>of</strong> the childrenand how they played and <strong>in</strong>ter-related. She noticed that they tended <strong>to</strong> play alongtraditional l<strong>in</strong>es with, for example, girls rarely choos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> play with the construction<strong>to</strong>ys. In role play and dress<strong>in</strong>g up, they tended <strong>to</strong> conform <strong>to</strong> stereotypical heroes androle models. She had been further prompted <strong>to</strong> consider gender differences after sheattended a national sem<strong>in</strong>ar where the speaker had ‘<strong>to</strong>uched on gender’, rais<strong>in</strong>g issuessuch as right and left side bra<strong>in</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ance.This had made her, and subsequently the rest <strong>of</strong> the staff <strong>in</strong> the nursery, more conscious<strong>of</strong> the criteria used <strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g and buy<strong>in</strong>g resources. They avoided buy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ys andother resources which could be categorised as ‘women’s work’, e.g. iron<strong>in</strong>g boards, andtried <strong>to</strong> be ‘gender neutral’ <strong>in</strong> their selections.______________________________________________________________________________________<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong> <strong>to</strong> 27 University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde<strong>Address</strong> <strong>Gender</strong> <strong>Inequalities</strong>and University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSEXECUTIVE S
- Page 5 and 6: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIntroductionThe Re
- Page 7 and 8: Staff and management in most school
- Page 9 and 10: 6. Management and whole school pers
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER ONE THE STUDYRecent researc
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF THE LITERATUR
- Page 15 and 16: 2.3 Causes of gender inequalityA ra
- Page 17 and 18: Archer and Yamashita (2003) argue t
- Page 19 and 20: ii. Assessment practicesNational mo
- Page 21 and 22: Further efforts to ensure ‘effect
- Page 23 and 24: Skelton (2001) argues that the basi
- Page 25 and 26: were still highly gendered. Further
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER THREE SURVEY OF LOCAL AUTHO
- Page 29 and 30: curriculum structures and lifelong
- Page 31 and 32: ‘Getting the best out of Boys’
- Page 33 and 34: 4.2 Early literacyLiteracy, or, mor
- Page 35: that it was concerned, at least in
- Page 39 and 40: to the boys, animal print designs a
- Page 41 and 42: parents and what they wanted. Overa
- Page 43 and 44: was a thrust in the policy towards
- Page 45 and 46: School 1In the first school, non-de
- Page 47 and 48: For pupils, there were some common
- Page 49 and 50: Staff interviewed thought that a pa
- Page 51 and 52: The initiative had not been evaluat
- Page 53 and 54: indicated that he believed there wa
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSIONThe review o
- Page 57 and 58: Pupils were particularly aware of g
- Page 59 and 60: differences in the ways that boys a
- Page 61 and 62: Burn, E (2001) Do boys need male pr
- Page 63 and 64: Lloyd, G (ed.) (2005) Problem Girls
- Page 65 and 66: Rowe, K, Nix, PJ and Tepper, G (199
- Page 67 and 68: APPENDIX 1 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LOCAL
- Page 69 and 70: 6. Would you expect any written pol
- Page 71 and 72: C. Strategies to address gender ine
- Page 73 and 74: Local authority161718Strategy/Area
- Page 75 and 76: Focus group schedule: pupilsThe the
- Page 77 and 78: 4. ImpactHas the project made any d
- Page 79 and 80: Policy origin of the initiativeLoca
- Page 81 and 82: Relationship with other strategiesE
- Page 83 and 84: Section 4Focus Group - ParentsGener