13.07.2015 Views

2001-2002 - College of Education - University of Illinois at Urbana ...

2001-2002 - College of Education - University of Illinois at Urbana ...

2001-2002 - College of Education - University of Illinois at Urbana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Doctor <strong>of</strong> Philosophy Degree (Ph.D.)Special Field. There are three possible r<strong>at</strong>ings for both sections <strong>of</strong> thequalifying exams.1. Excellent doctoral work. This r<strong>at</strong>ing is given for excellent doctoralwork. If more than fifty percent <strong>of</strong> a candid<strong>at</strong>e's r<strong>at</strong>ings are excellent,the student is given a letter <strong>of</strong> special commend<strong>at</strong>ion by thedepartment head/chair.2. S<strong>at</strong>isfactory doctoral work. This r<strong>at</strong>ing is given for work th<strong>at</strong>demonstr<strong>at</strong>es competence expected <strong>of</strong> advanced students in thefield. Candid<strong>at</strong>es who receive r<strong>at</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> "excellent" or "s<strong>at</strong>isfactory"doctoral work will pass the examin<strong>at</strong>ion.3. Uns<strong>at</strong>isfactory doctoral work. This r<strong>at</strong>ing is given for work th<strong>at</strong> canrange from completely uns<strong>at</strong>isfactory to work with significant gapsin knowledge. If, after the review, all readers agree th<strong>at</strong> the overallresponses in th<strong>at</strong> field constitute s<strong>at</strong>isfactory doctoral work, thecandid<strong>at</strong>e will pass the exam.If a second examin<strong>at</strong>ion is required, the readers shall communic<strong>at</strong>e themajor deficiencies to the candid<strong>at</strong>e and make a collective decision as tothe form<strong>at</strong> and scope <strong>of</strong> the second examin<strong>at</strong>ion. All faculty readers whoread the first exam will evalu<strong>at</strong>e the second exam unless a change inreaders has been approved by the department head/chair or designee.Once again, a s<strong>at</strong>isfactory or excellent r<strong>at</strong>ing must be awarded by allreaders for the candid<strong>at</strong>e to pass the second examin<strong>at</strong>ion, and shouldone or more readers judge the performance uns<strong>at</strong>isfactory, the readersshall meet to review the candid<strong>at</strong>e's performance. If extenu<strong>at</strong>ingcircumstances exist th<strong>at</strong> warrant a third <strong>at</strong>tempt, the adviser may requestapproval from the department head/chair or designee. Candid<strong>at</strong>es shallnormally be permitted two <strong>at</strong>tempts to pass the QualifyingExamin<strong>at</strong>ions.Promptness <strong>of</strong> Evalu<strong>at</strong>ions. Readers will be provided two weeks tocomplete their evalu<strong>at</strong>ions. After two weeks, the department will notifythe adviser th<strong>at</strong> evalu<strong>at</strong>ions are complete or indic<strong>at</strong>e the reader(s) whoare l<strong>at</strong>e. Both the department and the adviser will contact l<strong>at</strong>e readersand collect their evalu<strong>at</strong>ions. If a retake is required, readers' evalu<strong>at</strong>ionswill be due within one week <strong>of</strong> receiving the exam.Report <strong>of</strong> Examin<strong>at</strong>ion Results. After all readers for the exams havereturned their evalu<strong>at</strong>ions, a report is sent to the student from theirdepartment. The report indic<strong>at</strong>es readers' decisions. The student andadviser receive copies <strong>of</strong> reader sheets. The original forms, the exam35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!