HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORTFINALConditionAs a utilitarian space, the boilerroom is in good condition,with only the window showingany signs of deterioration.Most of the boiler roomhallway features and finishesare also in good condition,but the extensive delaminationand efflorescence aroundthe ashpit door is illustrativeof a larger water infiltrationproblem originating at the topof the chimney and bell tower.Boiler room walls: board form concrete and clay tile.Efflorescence and staining from ashpit door.Issues & Recommendations• The roofing, flashing,and/or sealant at thechimney cap has failedImpact damage to interior corners of boiler room hall.and significant amountsof water is poolinginside the chimney aswell as along the chimney walls. Water infiltration, efflorescence, and plasterdelamination is concentrated at the bottom of the chimney surroundingthe ashpit door in the boiler room hall, but the source of the water clearlyoriginates at the top of the chimney. Efflorescence on the interior plastersurface suggests that water is being transported through the material, causingdelamination of the finish coat, and may be corroding the embedded steel.To alleviate delamination caused by efflorescence, the transportation ofwater through the concrete must be mitigated. A qualified structural engineershould assess the viability of the concrete. Once the chimney cap and flashingis repaired, then the plaster can be repaired using Big Wally’s Plaster Magicor similar product (see treatment of common materials below for repairs tointerior plaster).68MARCH 2012
PRESIDIO CHAPEL (BUILDING 130)SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA• As with other doors, the wardrobe doors should be refinished and repainted.• A notable amount of damage has occurred to the two interior cornersbetween the boiler room hall and the bell tower. It is recommended that theplaster be repaired and unobtrusive corner protectors be installed to protectthe plaster from further impacts.• Asbestos-containing duct tape and grout was located in the boiler room,though all were found to be of low friability rating and low potential for damage.CONCLUSIONImplementation of water infiltration mitigation measures, appropriate repairsto exterior stucco and interior plaster, as well as the establishment of a cyclicmaintenance program will alleviate general deterioration at the chapel andimprove the building’s overall appearance. Additional enhancement of lighting,climate control, electrical systems, and accessibility will further improvethe chapel’s usability, comfort, and convenience for visitors and employees.Conservation of historic stained glass windows and the mural will crown theentire rehabilitation effort by improving the historic feeling and association ofthe <strong>Presidio</strong> <strong>Chapel</strong>.The vast majority of deterioration within the <strong>Presidio</strong> <strong>Chapel</strong> is moisturerelated.Improper drainage around the building foundation; and failure ofweatherproofing around windows, doors, and roof flashing is causing waterpenetration, which in some locations is severe. On the exterior, water damage ismanifest as staining and fungal/bacterial growth, which may conveniently helpidentify locations where water is likely entering the wall system. Window wellsand the west stairwell present further drainage challenges that must be correctedin order to preserve the integrity and operability of historic wood windows anddoors. Although much of the deterioration is easily reparable, the cumulativeeffect of water infiltration from the roof all the way down to the foundationcould be illustrative of a larger problem that will certainly become critical if notadequately addressed.Water penetration on the exterior is manifest as deterioration of interior surfacesand finishes. Areas of primary concern include the Hope Window in the chanceland wood wainscoting below, basement ashpit door, and basement concreteapron, as well as serious water infiltration within the bell tower and organ pipechambers. Minor surface deterioration, including worn interior wood surfaces,past installations of fluorescent lights, damaged mortar joints between chapelfloor tiles, exposed electrical conduit, and general wear and tear after 75-years ofuse leaves an appearance of improper care.PART III: TREATMENTRECOMMENDATIONSPage & Turnbull69