13.07.2015 Views

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> measures to increase seat belt use, the report concluded:Seat belt legislation and enforcement have been in existence in Australia andother countries for well over four decades. These appear to be the simplestand most cost-effective long-term approaches to increasing seat belt use rates,and can be enhanced by publicity and education campaigns to raise theawareness <strong>of</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> wearing seat belts.<strong>In</strong> addition, much research effort has been applied to the development andimplementation <strong>of</strong> seat belt reminder and interlock technologies.Unfortunately, only a few evaluations <strong>of</strong> their effectiveness have beenconducted, but <strong>of</strong> those available, it appears that reminder systems <strong>of</strong>feroverall high protective value, can achieve high levels <strong>of</strong> seat belt wearing, andtarget all groups <strong>of</strong> wearers from full-time and part-time wearers to consistentnon wearers. Reminder systems that are aggressive and adaptive (changingcharacteristics during a trip) appear to be optimal. <strong>In</strong>terlock systems appear tobenefit those most resistant to wearing seat belts in particular.The <strong>In</strong>ternational Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group (IRTAD) recentlypublished a report summarising trends in road safety in 27 member countries. 237 <strong>In</strong>that report, each country included information regarding several aspects <strong>of</strong> roadsafety, including seat belt use. The Australian report noted that seat belt use wasestimated to be greater than 95% for front-seat occupants and more than 80% forrear-seat occupants. The Australian report also noted that:Despite high general usage rates, the rates <strong>of</strong> non-use among fatally injuredvehicle occupants are still estimated at 28%. Analysis indicates that this highfigure is the result <strong>of</strong> a high crash involvement rate among those who do notwear belts, as well as the fact that they are more likely to be killed if involvedin a crash.The seat belt use rates for several countries are included in Table L1. Cautionshould be used when comparing countries because data may have been collected indifferent ways and in different conditions. Overall, seat belt use in Australia andmajor European countries was higher than for the three Asian countries included inthe report (Japan, Korea and Malaysia), particularly for rear-seat passengers. Itshould be noted that seat belts in rear seats became mandatory in these Asiancountries since <strong>2008</strong> whereas they became mandatory in other countries earlier. Theextent to which these results apply to other Asian countries (such as <strong>In</strong>dia andSingapore), or to seat belt use on aircraft, is not clear.237IRTAD Annual Report 2009. IRTAD is a permanent working group <strong>of</strong> the Joint Research centre<strong>of</strong> the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the <strong>In</strong>ternational TrafficForum.- 280 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!