13.07.2015 Views

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 13: Troubleshooting data relating to the ADIRUsUnitsADIRUconnectionsResultsFCPC 1,FCPC 2,FCPC 3FMGEC 1,FMGEC 2ADIRU 2,ADIRU 3All 3 ADIRUsAll 3 ADIRUsAll 3 ADIRUsAt 0440, problem detected with ADIRU 1 data (IR andADR). Subsequent problems also detected.No problems with ADIRU 2 or ADIRU 3 data.At 0440, problem detected with ADIRU 1 data.No problems with ADIRU 2 or ADIRU 3 data.At 0440, problem detected with altitude and/or trueairspeed data not being received from ADIRU 1 at thedesigned rate (section 1.12.6).No problems with ADIRU 2 or ADIRU 3 data.GPWS ADIRU 1 At 0440, problem detected with ADIRU 1 data.LGCIU 1,LGCIU 2ADR1 and ADR 3At 0531, problem detected with loss <strong>of</strong> computedairspeed from ADR 1.No problems with ADR 3 data.1.12.4 Functional testing <strong>of</strong> aircraft systemsAfter the PFR and TSD data were downloaded, functional tests were performed onseveral aircraft systems at <strong>Learmonth</strong> in accordance with the aircraft manufacturer'srecommendations. The systems included the EFCS, ADIRS, FMGES, PHCs, multimodereceivers (which included the GPS receivers), and the electrical powergeneration system.All <strong>of</strong> the functional tests were successfully completed except for a single EFCStask that involved the reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the elevator servo-controller to anothercomputer. The aircraft manufacturer advised that this was a previously identifiedanomaly that was only triggered under a very specific set <strong>of</strong> circumstances and wasnot related to the occurrence. 601.12.5 Aircraft wiring examinationsThe data-spike failure mode affected data that was transmitted on multiple,segregated wires out <strong>of</strong> the ADIRU (and based on information obtained frommultiple, segregated wires into the ADIRU). A simultaneous problem with multiple,segregated wires was considered very unlikely.Nevertheless, a range <strong>of</strong> testing was conducted on the aircraft wiring, and noproblems were found. More specifically:• Due to the extent <strong>of</strong> damage to the ceiling panels in the cabin, all the panelswere removed and the wiring looms were visually inspected while the aircraftwas at <strong>Learmonth</strong>. No defects were observed.• After the aircraft was ferried to a maintenance base in Sydney, the operatorconducted precautionary checks <strong>of</strong> the aircraft’s ADIRU interface wiring that60The anomaly only occurred during the performance <strong>of</strong> functional tests. It appeared with theintroduction <strong>of</strong> a particular FCSC s<strong>of</strong>tware version.- 50 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!