13.07.2015 Views

Australasian Anaesthesia 2011 - Australian and New Zealand ...

Australasian Anaesthesia 2011 - Australian and New Zealand ...

Australasian Anaesthesia 2011 - Australian and New Zealand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Care of the potential lung transplant donor – optimisation, prevention of decline <strong>and</strong> future prospects. 93Care of the potential lung transplant donor – optimisation, preventionof decline <strong>and</strong> future prospectsIAN JAMES SMITH, MBCHB, FANZCAThe Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld 4032Dr Smith is a staff specialist in cardiothoracic anaesthesia at Prince Charles Hospital in Brisbane, with main interestsin heart <strong>and</strong> lung transplantation, ex vivo lung perfusion <strong>and</strong> other high-risk cardiothoracic anaesthesia. He hasdone fellowships in cardiothoracic anaesthesia in <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> at Toronto General Hospital, Canada.INTRODUCTIONIn Australasia, <strong>and</strong> elsewhere, the balance of patients requiring organ transplantation <strong>and</strong> organ availability is nevermet. Each year the number awaiting transplantation rises <strong>and</strong> the number of available donors remains near static.Patients die on the waiting list due to inadequate donor numbers. Those presenting for transplantation may havebecome critically ill during their waiting time. This increases peri-operative risk <strong>and</strong> may result in longer intensivecare unit (ICU) stays with higher management complexity <strong>and</strong> increased morbidity or delisting, hopefully until healthrecovery allows transplantation. In Queensl<strong>and</strong>, approximately 20% of those listed for transplantation either die orare delisted due to deterioration whilst awaiting a donor.Multiple approaches exist to increase organ donor availability. Donor awareness programs aim to educate thepublic 1 even to the extent of utilising social networking. 2 Maximal donor numbers (assuming maximal detection<strong>and</strong> support) are expected to be 50 donors per million population (pmp). Spain had the highest rates at 30-35pmpwhilst Australia was 13.8 <strong>and</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> 9.4pmp in 2010. 3,4 DonateLife has been instrumental in raising donornumbers in Australia, however, some donor organs that could be used are rejected. Local data shows this can befor several reasons. A review performed recently in Queensl<strong>and</strong> of donors over the past 22 years showed a 46%utilisation rate. Non use was for poor gas exchange in 22%, infection in 9% <strong>and</strong> chest radiograph abnormality in5%, the remainder being of mixed causes (personal correspondence Dr Peter Hopkins).Those lungs offered for donation that are rejected, may be due to not meeting ideal or extended donor criteria.Deterioration may occur in between listing <strong>and</strong> retrieval making some ideal donors no longer acceptable.This may be due to circumstances surrounding injury or emergency intubation such as aspiration <strong>and</strong> trauma.Hospital acquired factors may contribute including ventilator acquired lung injury (VALI) or nosocomial pneumonia/ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP). Fluid overload may also occur <strong>and</strong> the effects of this may be exacerbated bythe process of brain stem death. The severity of these factors may result in lungs that would otherwise be acceptedunder current ideal criteria (see table) being subsequently rejected for transplantation.This review is targeted at those caring for the lung transplant donor, especially those who may see donorsinfrequently. This paper will review current donor criteria, the pathophysiology of brain death, the current donormanagement protocol <strong>and</strong> discuss the evidence supporting it, <strong>and</strong> discuss other donor strategies <strong>and</strong> developmentsaimed at increasing donor numbers.DONOR TYPESCurrently the majority of lung donors are from those undergoing donation after brain death (DBD). Causes of braindeath commonly include cerebrovascular accident, trauma (road <strong>and</strong> non-road), hypoxic anoxia (drowning, cardiacarrest, hanging, overdose) <strong>and</strong> less commonly cerebral tumour. A small but growing number of donors are fromdonation after cardiac death (DCD). These are donors who have failed DBD testing <strong>and</strong> have brain injury from whichsurvival is deemed impossible <strong>and</strong> life support is to be withdrawn. The Maastricht Criteria is used to classify DCDdonors according to place <strong>and</strong> mode of circulatory death. 5 A further group of DBD <strong>and</strong> DCD donors may be includedas “marginal or extended donor criteria”, those who do not meet accepted ideal donor criteriaTHE IDEAL LUNG DONOR CRITERIAA set of criteria has arisen somewhat arbitrarily for selecting the lung donor. 6 Surprisingly these criteria are supportedby little evidence but are hard to dispute as r<strong>and</strong>omised studies would face ethical difficulties.• Age less than 55• ABO compatibility• Clear chest radiograph• Pa02 >300 on FiO2 1.0 (PaO2:FiO2), PEEP 5cmH2O• Tobacco history

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!