100 <strong>Australasian</strong> <strong>Anaesthesia</strong> <strong>2011</strong>Care of the potential lung transplant donor – optimisation, prevention of decline <strong>and</strong> future prospects. 101LIVING LOBE DONATIONSeveral centres worldwide perform living lobe donation. This clearly is more complex surgery <strong>and</strong> includes potentialmorbidity to an otherwise healthy donor. Two donors may donate a lobe each providing the recipient with two lobes.It is not offered in Australasia at this time.DCDDonation after cardiac death as against brain stem death provides an emerging donor pool. This is discussedelsewhere within this journal. Essentially those patients failing brain death testing but with brain injury deemedunsurvivable, <strong>and</strong> having their treatment withdrawn may donate. If irreversible cardiac death occurs within anaccepted time, organ procurement of lungs, liver <strong>and</strong> kidneys may be performed. Between 1989 <strong>and</strong> 2010, over200 additional donors provided a further 58 donor lungs for transplantation. 3EXTENDED DONOR CRITERIAThis group of patients is increasingly being explored as a donor pool. Marginal or extended criteria patients arethose with one or more donor criteria, most commonly PaO2:FiO2 ratio, age, smoking history or CXR abnormalityoutside the ideal range. The current basis of donor assessment is continually questioned in an attempt to explorefurther means of increasing donor numbers. 6EX VIVO LUNG PERFUSIONEx-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) <strong>and</strong> reconditioning is an emerging technology first used in Sweden in 2001 by StigSteen et al. 24 This technique involves explant of donor lungs followed by ex-vivo perfusion <strong>and</strong> ventilation. Donorsmay be DBD with marginal or poor gas exchange or DCD donors whose lungs require further assessment. The lungblock is perfused via a pulmonary artery cannula <strong>and</strong> a flange sutured to the donor left atrium. The perfusate is anacellular or low (10%) haematocrit heparinised buffered crystalloid solution containing albumin <strong>and</strong> dextran withoptimised colloid osmotic pressure, Steen Solution (Vitrolife, Göteborg Sweden). This is delivered by a centrifugalpump via a gas exchanger under pressure, flow <strong>and</strong> temperature controls. The lungs’ trachea is intubated <strong>and</strong>ventilated with a protective lung ventilation strategy including regular recruitment <strong>and</strong> bronchial toilet. The gasexchange membrane (effectively a de-oxygenator) is adjusted to provide oxygen <strong>and</strong> carbon dioxide partial pressuresmimicking mixed venous blood in the delivery limb of the circuit. The perfusate is sampled on the pulmonary venousside of the circuit so that the gas exchange capability of the lungs is assessable. The temperature of the circuit iscontrolled to minimise warm ischaemia. Keshavjee et al in Toronto have shown in a prospective non-r<strong>and</strong>omisedtrial that this technique has the capacity to increase donor numbers by nearly 20%. They demonstrated that lungsfrom 20 donors with “high risk” profiles (PaO2:FiO2
The Last Frontier: Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) reaches Western Australia 103The Last Frontier: Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) reachesWestern AustraliaDAVID SIMES, MB BS, ECFMG, FANZCA, FCICMDavid Simes is an anaesthesia-trained Intensive Care specialist with an interest in organ donation. The <strong>Australian</strong>Government’s organ donation reform agenda created new positions in the national <strong>and</strong> regional branches ofDonateLife, Australia’s national organ <strong>and</strong> tissue donation agency. Dr Simes was seconded to the agency to helpintroduce DCD to the last bastion of medical conservatism in Australia’s organ donation network.INTRODUCTIONThere have now been more than 200 donors after declaration of cardiac death in Australia, allowing more than 300people to come off dialysis <strong>and</strong> extend the duration <strong>and</strong> quality of their lives, <strong>and</strong> more than 60 people with respiratoryfailure to have an otherwise unavailable chance to experience sometimes decades of quality life. 1<strong>New</strong> South Wales <strong>and</strong> Victoria have been the DCD leaders in Australia, followed by Queensl<strong>and</strong>, South Australia<strong>and</strong> the <strong>Australian</strong> Capital Territory.A notable exception has been Western Australia.The drive to pursue DCD comes from the outcome data showing at least equally good medium term results forkidney donation 2 , <strong>and</strong>, surprisingly, superior medium term outcomes for young lung transplant recipients from DCDdonors compared with DBD donors. 3 Well-selected donors for liver donation have also resulted in a smaller numberof good liver transplant outcomes after DCD.Given the immeasurable relief of human suffering <strong>and</strong> prolongation of life resulting from the worldwide engagementin DCD, WA’s reluctance to participate has been remarkable.CRAZY PRESS AND CONFUSION“Hospitals take organs before brain death”: was the headline in the West <strong>Australian</strong> newspaper on May 18, <strong>2011</strong>, 4sending alarm <strong>and</strong> confusion through the people of Perth. The article was probably referring to DCD. In just a fewfront page paragraphs, the article managed to squeeze in the obnoxious term “harvest” twice, cast doubt on thedeclaration of both brain death <strong>and</strong> cardiac death, <strong>and</strong> throw in the opt-in-opt-out debate. And DCD was suddenlyfront page news.SO WHAT IS DCD?The concept is easy: after your heart stops beating, <strong>and</strong> after a period of invasive <strong>and</strong> non-invasive monitoringobserved by two senior medical practitioners, you may be declared deceased by these two doctors on the basisof your prolonged non-responsiveness, apnoea <strong>and</strong> circulatory arrest.If your organs have not suffered too much damage during this progression to circulatory arrest, your kidneys,liver <strong>and</strong> lungs may work in someone with those failures, <strong>and</strong> it may be possible for you to be taken to an operatingtheatre <strong>and</strong> have those organs posthumously removed for donation.Sounds very similar to…how we declare death already: unresponsiveness, apnoea <strong>and</strong> no central palpablepulse. Isn’t that how we’ve always declared death?It is. But it’s the disconcerting swiftness to operate just after declaration of death, our worry about getting itwrong, the concern that the patient’s circulation might re-start <strong>and</strong> the misperception that doctors may be seen tobe acting to facilitate organ donation rather than optimising the patient’s chances of survival, that has causedconcern.Back to the article, “hospitals take organs before brain death”. The headline is both confusing <strong>and</strong> inaccurate.By the time you’ve had a completely arrested circulation for fifteen minutes or more, added to a protracted periodof hypotension <strong>and</strong> any pre-existing brain lesion, you will have lost all brain activity for some time. “Brain death”won’t be declared, just as we don’t declare brain death on people who are found deceased on the hospital wards,at home or in the cemetery. You are deceased based on the absence of signs of life.So cardiac death is simpler than brain death, <strong>and</strong> easier for families to accept. Cardiac death is regular death.Brain death was the controversial death that needed specific legal sanction, 5 <strong>and</strong> continues to be debated by sometheologians <strong>and</strong> ethicists.So, organ donation after “cardiac” death...that doesn’t sound extraordinary at all.How could that possibly be controversial?And what could possibly go wrong?HISTORY OF NHBD (NON-HEART-BEATING DONATION)/DCDThe very first human kidney transplant was performed in Kiev in 1933, a donation after cardiac death. It sufferedrejection <strong>and</strong> failed. For the next two decades, immunological naïveté <strong>and</strong> organ rejection thwarted transplantsuccess. 6Only 57 years ago (1954), the first successful human living donor kidney transplant took place, from 24 year oldRonald Herrick, to his twin brother Richard. 7 The donor, Ron Herrick, died less than a year ago in <strong>2011</strong>, while hisbrother survived for 8 years. The donor pool was tiny: a twin with two functioning kidneys donated to his geneticallyidentical brother, getting around any DNA differences in the era of inadequate immunosuppression, in a procedurewe might now call directed altruistic living donation.