13.07.2015 Views

Measurement of the Jet Energy Scale in the CMS experiment ... - IIHE

Measurement of the Jet Energy Scale in the CMS experiment ... - IIHE

Measurement of the Jet Energy Scale in the CMS experiment ... - IIHE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5: Estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jet</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Scale</strong> Calibration Factor 79chosen jet-parton comb<strong>in</strong>ation returned by <strong>the</strong> MVA method would still be taken ascorrect. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reconstruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leptonic part <strong>of</strong> t¯t systemfor this analysis, <strong>the</strong>re is no force applied on <strong>the</strong> MVA method to associate a jetcorrectly to <strong>the</strong> leptonic b quark <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al state. The “Bad” jet comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>the</strong>n is<strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation for which <strong>the</strong> MVA cannot associate, correctly, at least one hadronicquark <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> t → Wb → q¯qb decay topolology, to a reconstructed jet <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> four lead<strong>in</strong>gjets found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> event. Although <strong>in</strong> some cases <strong>the</strong> chosen jet-parton comb<strong>in</strong>ationby <strong>the</strong> MVA, is <strong>the</strong> true comb<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>in</strong> about half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases <strong>the</strong> Likelihood Ratiomethod is not able to return <strong>the</strong> true jet-parton comb<strong>in</strong>ation.# events900800700Good <strong>Jet</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ationsBad <strong>Jet</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ations60050040030020010000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1Likelihood ResponseFigure 5.6: The maximum among twelve possible values returned by <strong>the</strong> LikelihoodRatio method per event. Only those selected e+jets events for which <strong>the</strong> hadronic jetsare matched to <strong>the</strong> hadronic quarks <strong>in</strong> t → Wb → q¯qb, are taken <strong>in</strong>to account.Consider<strong>in</strong>g those selected events with a correct jet-parton comb<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong> plotwhich conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> purity versus efficiency for <strong>the</strong> different cut values on <strong>the</strong> Likelihoodresponse, is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.7. Efficiency is def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selectede+jets events with a right jet comb<strong>in</strong>ation that pass <strong>the</strong> cut on <strong>the</strong> Likelihood Ratioresponse. Purity is def<strong>in</strong>ed to be <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selected e+jets events with a rightjet comb<strong>in</strong>ation that pass <strong>the</strong> cut on <strong>the</strong> Likelihood response relative to <strong>the</strong> multiplicity<strong>of</strong> all selected e+jets events, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ei<strong>the</strong>r a right or wrong jet comb<strong>in</strong>ation, thatpass <strong>the</strong> cut on <strong>the</strong> Likelihood Ratio response.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Monte Carlo truth, <strong>in</strong> only 34% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selected e+jets t¯t events,<strong>the</strong> three reconstructed jets among <strong>the</strong> four lead<strong>in</strong>g jets are matched, truly, to <strong>the</strong>hadronic quarks <strong>in</strong> t → Wb → q¯qb. As it is understood from Figure 5.7, <strong>the</strong> LikelihoodRatio method is able to successfully f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> true comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> 51% <strong>of</strong> those eventswith a true jet-parton match<strong>in</strong>g, given that no cut is applied on <strong>the</strong> Likelihood Ratioresponse. Compar<strong>in</strong>g to a random selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> true comb<strong>in</strong>ation that yields aprobability <strong>of</strong> about 8% <strong>of</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right jet comb<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong> great improvementwhich is obta<strong>in</strong>ed when us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> MVA method is obvious.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!