Measurement of the Jet Energy Scale in the CMS experiment ... - IIHE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

86 CHAPTER 5: Estimating of the Jet Energy Scale Calibration Factorjet is computed as the width of the Gaussian function fitted on the distribution of thedifference between the value of the X parameter of the reconstructed jet and the valueof the X parameter of the matched parton to that jet. The resolutions on the variouskinematics of the jets, namely transverse energy E T , polar angle θ and azimuthal angleφ as a function of the transverse momentum of the jets are shown in Figure 5.10 andFigure 5.11, for the light quark and the b quark jets, respectively. In each figure, theleft plots represent the typical jets reconstructed in the barrel while the right plots areobtained for typical jets reconstructed in a narrow region in the endcaps. The obtainedresolution plots are fitted with functions which are specified on the plot. For example,the distribution of the resolution on the transverse energy of the jets is fitted with afunction which is parametrized as a+b √ p T +cp T . The free parameters of the functionare determined from the fit and quoted on each plot.From Figure 5.10, it can be seen that the absolute resolution on the transverseenergy for jets with higher transverse momenta is worse, while the relative resolutionis worse for the jets with lower transverse momenta, as discussed in Section 3.2.4. Alsoit can be deduced that the resolution on the angular distributions is better determinedcompared to the resolution on the transverse energy. This is because of the matchingrequirement applied between the reconstructed jets and the partons in (η × φ) space.The resolutions on the spatial coordinates of the reconstructed jets are decreased forjets with higher transverse momenta, because the jets with higher transverse momentaare less affected by the magnetic field. The polar angle of reconstructed jets can bedetermined with higher precision compared to the azimuthal angle. This is due tothe bending of charged particle in the direction of φ. Comparing with the plots inFigure 5.11, it can be understood that the resolution on the transverse energy of bquark jets is worse compared to the resolution on the transverse energy of light quarkjets. This is due to the presence of muons or neutrinos in the decay products of bquark jets which yields to cluster less energy for b quark jets as muons and neutrinosare weakly interacting particles. There is no big difference observed when comparingthe resolutions on the spatial kinematics of b quark and non-b quark jets.5.3 Extra Event Selection CutsSo far, events have been required to pass the basic event selection cuts that are summarizedin Table 4.6. The selected events are subsequently fed to the MVA package. Theoutput of the MVA method is a matching between the reconstructed jets in the finalstate of the e+jets t¯t event and the partons appearing in the hadronic branch of the t¯tsystem t → Wb → q¯qb, as described in Section 5.1. The chosen jet-parton combinationreturned by the MVA method, can be either right or wrong. As already mentioned, theMVA method which has been trained using the variables listed in Section 5.1.4, is notable to choose the correct jet-parton matching in about 50% of the cases. This is partlydue to the ISR/FSR effects which makes it possible to get the radiation jets amongthe four leading jets and then at least one of the four leading jets can not be matchedto the hard-scatter partons. The e+jets t¯t events, for which a wrong jet combinationis recognized by the MVA or the event itself is badly reconstructed, contribute to the
2χ / ndf18.76 / 7p0 9.492e-08 ±9.472p1 1.185±0.07715p2 -0.01065±0.0091122χ / ndf14.59 / 8p0 0.01114 ±0.001156p1 1.46±0.05471χ 2/ ndf9.294 / 8p0 0.01116±0.002424p1 2.676 ±0.085742χ / ndf18.59 / 7p0 5.956 ±0.5679p1 0±1.719p2 0.03635 ±0.0091672χ / ndf5.119 / 8p0 5.548e-09 ±0.004184p1 0.7435±0.027122χ / ndf26.14 / 8p0 -2.627e-15±0.003853p1 2.629 ±0.09587CHAPTER 5: Estimating of the Jet Energy Scale Calibration Factor 87) (GeV)CaloJetTσ(E16141210864200.000≤|η|
Page 1:
Vrije Universiteit BrusselFaculteit
Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe Standard Model of p
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 1The Standard Model of Part
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 1: The Standard Model of Pa
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2The CMS experiment at the
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 2: The CMS experiment at th
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 3Object ReconstructionThe e
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 3: Object Reconstruction 31
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 3: Object Reconstruction 33
Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 3: Object Reconstruction 35
Page 51 and 52: Chapter 4Reconstructing and Selecti
Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 4: Reconstructing and Selec
Page 71 and 72: Chapter 5Estimating of the Jet Ener
Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 5: Estimating of the Jet En
Page 89: CHAPTER 5: Estimating of the Jet En
Page 131 and 132: Chapter 6ConclusionThe Standard Mod
Page 133 and 134: CHAPTER 6: Conclusion 129The method
Page 135 and 136: Bibliography[1] M. E. Peskin and D.
Page 137 and 138: BIBLIOGRAPHY 133[40] The ALICE Coll
Page 139 and 140: BIBLIOGRAPHY 135[76] The CMS Collab
Page 141 and 142:
SummaryJets appear in the final sta
show all

Measurement of the Jet Energy Scale in the CMS experiment ... - IIHE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?