13.07.2015 Views

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

256 C.J. Colbourn, V.R. Syrotiuk, and A.C.H. L<strong>in</strong>gExpected Throughput0.40.30.20.1S(2,k,v) ThroughputRatio to TDMA Throughput3530252015105S(2,k,v) Throughput vs. TDMA05 10 15 20 25Density of Neighbourhood05 10 15 20 25Density of NeighbourhoodFig. 5. Throughput versus density for (a) S(2,k,v); and (b) versus TDMA, for k =3, 6, 9, 12.larger neighbourhood sizes <strong>in</strong> general. The reason that the curves are jagged isthat the closest <strong>in</strong>teger value is taken as the percentage of neighbours, i.e., we donot consider fractional numbers of neighbours. While the figure shows S(2,k,v)for k =3, 6, 9, 12, only the first three values of v for each k are shown s<strong>in</strong>cethe computations are highly memory and compute <strong>in</strong>tensive. The y-<strong>in</strong>terceptsare the same as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1. As a function of neighbourhood density, the expectedthroughput (a) is more well-behaved than as a function of neighbourhood size.When the ratio of expected throughput to TDMA throughput is consideredversus neighbourhood density (b) the curves drop more rapidly as the density<strong>in</strong>creases more rapidly than a l<strong>in</strong>ear function.F<strong>in</strong>ally, Fig. 6 once aga<strong>in</strong> plots expected throughput versus neighbourhoodsize for three Ste<strong>in</strong>er systems that support the same number of nodes, namelyN = 651 and one orthogonal array that supports a number very close to that(625). Specifically from the top down, the curves correspond to S(2, 3, 63),S(2, 9, 217), S(2, 26, 651) and OA(2, 26, 25). First, we see that the last two curvesare essentially <strong>in</strong>dist<strong>in</strong>guishable from each other. That is, for all <strong>in</strong>tents andpurposes, the S(2, 26, 651) and OA(2, 26, 25) give the same performance but theSte<strong>in</strong>er system supports more nodes. The Ste<strong>in</strong>er system with shorter framelength gives better expected throughput until the neighbourhood is about 20,at which po<strong>in</strong>t the curves all cross. Its performance also degrades more rapidlywith <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g neighbourhood size.4 Summary and ConclusionsIn this paper, we stepped back and exam<strong>in</strong>ed anew the comb<strong>in</strong>atorial propertiesof topology-transparent schedules. The properties were found to correspondprecisely to D cover-free families, where D is a design parameter <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>gmaximum number of neighbours.Studies of several Ste<strong>in</strong>er systems show the follow<strong>in</strong>g general trends. Ste<strong>in</strong>ersystems admit shorter schedules (frames) than previous cosntructions based on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!