13.07.2015 Views

Chapter 5 Genetic Analysis of Apomixis - cimmyt

Chapter 5 Genetic Analysis of Apomixis - cimmyt

Chapter 5 Genetic Analysis of Apomixis - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 4Ultrastructural <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> ApomicticDevelopmentTAMARA N. NALIMOVA AND JEAN-PHILIPPE VIELLE-CALZADAIntroductionSince the first applications <strong>of</strong> electronmicroscopy to the observation <strong>of</strong> plant tissues,numerous studies have focused on theultrastructural characteristics <strong>of</strong> sexualreproduction in flowering plants (Jensen1965; Jensen and Fischer 1968). In manyspecies, a wealth <strong>of</strong> information has beenpresented on the morphology <strong>of</strong> the femalegametophyte (megagametophyte or embryosac) before and after pollen tube arrival(Russell 1985; Mogensen 1988; Russell 1992;Huang and Russell 1992). Valuablecontributions to the understanding <strong>of</strong> doublefertilization have also emerged from studiesthat combine light and electron microscopywith technological advances on the in vitroisolation and fusion <strong>of</strong> gametes (Kranz et al.1991; Faure et al. 1994). Nevertheless, thefundamental mysteries involving cell to cellsignals and interactions duringme,gagametogenesis and fertilization insexual and apomictic species are stillunsolved. These enigmas include the nature<strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> sperm cells within theegg apparatus, the specific recognition <strong>of</strong>male and female gametes, the molecularnature <strong>of</strong> plasma membrane adherence, andthe association, fusion, and activation <strong>of</strong>parental nuclei (Gerassimova-Navashina1957; Russell 1992).Despite the increasing scientific interest inapomixis (Asker and Jerling 1992; Vie lle­Calzada et al. 1996a), few studies havecharacterized the fine structure <strong>of</strong>megagametophytes involved in apomicticreproduction. Cytological studies based onlight microscopy have identified thefundamental differences existing between thegeneral organization <strong>of</strong> sexual and apomicticfemale gametophyes in different genera(Bashaw and Holt 1958; Voigt and Bashaw1972; Philipson 1978; Campbell et al. 1987;Crane and Carman 1987; Burson et al. 1990).The fine structure <strong>of</strong> nucellar andintegumentary embryony has beeninvestigated in some detail for a limitednumber <strong>of</strong> species (Naumova and Willemse1982; Wilms et al. 1983; Naumova 1993), andultrastructural studies <strong>of</strong> diplospory have beeninitiated in only a few apomicitic species <strong>of</strong>Poa (Naumova et al. 1999). In addition, a fewultrastructural characterizations <strong>of</strong>megagametophyte development andfertilization have been conducted in someaposporous members <strong>of</strong> the Poaceae (Chapmanand Busri 1994; Naumova and Willemse 1995;Vielle et al. 1995),The occurrence <strong>of</strong> apomixis in species thathave conserved the ability to reproducesexually provides unique opportunities forcomparative ultrastructural studies. Theformation <strong>of</strong> sexual and apomicticmegagametophytes can simultaneously occurin the same genotype or in different genotypes<strong>of</strong> the same population. Ultrastructuralcomparisons <strong>of</strong> megagametogenesis and earlyfertilization events in sexual and apomictic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!