152<strong>Comunicar</strong>, <strong>39</strong>, XX, 20121. IntroductionDigitisation has brought changes to the communicativesystem, with content production, work routines,media and distribution strategies and business modelsall undergoing important alterations. Public consumptionpatterns are also transforming and substantiallymodifying the system’s traditional dynamics. In thiscontext, ascertaining the changes in readers’ consumptionhabits is essential for measuring the scope andeffects of digital convergence and the outlook for thefuture, and to that end this article focuses on the analysisof information consumption in a specific age group:young people. They are pioneers in assimilating technologicalinnovations related to digitisation, and for thisthey are known as digital natives (Prensky, 2001; Pal -frey & Gasser, 2008) or members of the interactivegeneration (Bringué & Sádaba, 2009). Their conditionas early users (Livingstone & Bovill, 1999) makes thema priviliged case study for exploring the changes thathave resulted from the impact of the digital era.In order to study news consumption in the convergenceframe, this article begins with an examination ofnewspapers which later extends to general information,regardless of format. There are different reasonsthat justify this choice: newspapers have traditionallybeen considered the main referent source of information(Corroy, 2008). Moreover, they have been thesubject of most investigations focused on the study ofthe relationship between young people and news(Qayyum & al., 2010), and are undergoing a processof redefinition caused by the current financial crisis(Casero-Ripollés, 2010). However, this article is notjust confined to newspapers, as convergence imposesthe predominance of interconnections and interdependenceswithin the media scenario.The aims of this investigation are:1) To ascertain young people’s news consumptionhabits, particularly of newspaper, in the digital era.2) To discover the attitudes and perceptions ofyoung people towards journalistic information.The hypotheses of the investigation connected tothe above aims are:• H1. Young people’s news consumption goesbeyond newspapers, which are read less and less, andencompass a wide variety of media, especially onlinemedia.• H2. Young people show great interest in information,and attribute positive values to it.2. Literature reviewScientific investigation of young people’s newsconsumption habits has focused mainly on the analysisof newspapers. These studies have confirmed a consistentdecline in readership among this age group, atendency that began in the mid-Nineties (Lauf, 2001)and which affects most European countries (Brites,2010; Lipani, 2008; Raeymaeckers, 2004) includingSpain. The percentage of young people between 18and 25 who consume print media is 25.7 (AEDE,2010). Other investigations also confirm this rift be -tween young people and newspapers in Spain (Nava -rro, 2003; Arroyo, 2006; Túñez, 2009; Parratt, 2010).There are many reasons that explain the decline inyoung people’s newspaper consumption: lack of time,preference for other media, and little interest in thecontent (Huang, 2009; Bernal, 2009; Costera, 2007;Raeymaeckers, 2002). The near irrelevance of newsin their daily lives and the lack of a connection to theirpersonal experiences and interests are key factors(Patterson, 2007; Vanderbosch, Dhoets & Van derBulck, 2009; Qayyum et al., 2010). Young people notonly fail to see themselves reflected in newspapers orconventional media (Domingo, 2005), but feel thatthey are marginal to their agenda setting. In this sense,the invisibility of young people in the news has beenverified (Figueras & Mauri, 2010; Kotilainen, 2009)and the negativity that frequently attaches to them hasalso been confirmed (Túñez, 2009; Faucher, 2009;Bernier, 2011).All this is matched by the transformation arisingfrom the digital convergence (Islas, 2009) that leads toa multi-screen society (Pérez-Tornero, 2008) which inturn also has an effect. The emergence of windowsand news providers promoted by the Internet generatean overabundance of news and strong competition forreaders’ attention, which also partly explains this phenomenonof decline. Scientific literature also points toparental influence as a significant impact on youngpeople’s press consumption (Qayyum & al., 2010;Huang, 2009; Costera, 2007; Raeymaeckers, 2004;2002).Young people’s news consumption is conditionedby two key factors: the age effect, as people get olderthey consume more and show greater interest in news(Qayyum et al., 2010; Huang, 2009; Lipani, 2008);the second factor is related to genre. Some authorsdetect a gap that sees men’s consumption becomemore intense than women’s (Brites, 2010; Raey -maeckers, 2004; Navarro, 2003; Lauf, 2001).The distancing between young people and newspapershas three consequences. Firstly, the decline inyoung newspaper readers means the loss of an importantpotential market, and therefore, a fall in circulationand profits (Arnould, 2004). Secondly, the ageing of© ISSN: 1134-3478 • e-ISSN: 1988-3293• Pages 151-158
153newspaper consumers does not guarantee a generationalshift in readers (Lauf, 2001). Finally, newspapershave traditionally been considered the primary accesspoint to public affairs (Brites, 2010), and also a socializingagent of politics for young people (Romer,Jamie son & Pasek, 2009). In this sense, the lack ofinterest in the press could diminish young people’scivic consciousness.3. MethodologyThe methodological design of this investigation isbased on a quantitative survey. This technique aims toobtain data about objective aspects (frequencies) andsubjective aspects (opinions and attitudes) based onthe information from individual interviews. The questionnaireis formed of three types of close-ended questions:dichotomous choice, multiple choice and openendedquestions, using a set of values from 0 to 10.The study combines single-answer with multiple choicequestions.The field survey was carried out from January toApril 2011. The procedure used was the face-to-faceinterview method. Subsequently, the data were treatedwith the statistical program SPSS. Age and genrehave been used as dependent variables while consumptionand information perceptions are taken to beindependent variables. The former include the frequencyof reading newspapers, the way they accessnews, the number of media used to get informed, andpayment predisposition. The latter focus on interest innews, and the civic values attributed to it. The studypopulation is made up of 16 to 30-year-olds living inCatalonia (Spain), a segment which numbers1,.284,005 individuals according to Idescat data from2009. The sample is formed of 549 surveys randomlyselected. The genre distribution of the sample is45.35% men and 54.65% women.4. Results4.1. Frequency of newspaper readingYoung people who state that they read the presseveryday account for 28.8% of the total (Table 1),which signifies reduced newspaper consumptionamong this age group.The results reinforce the importance of the ageeffect on newspaper consumption; as readers getolder, they mature and their interest in the press rises,hence the increase by 31.3 points between 16-17 yearolds and those 23 or older (Table 1). These datademonstrate that as young people get older they ac -quire a greater need to be informed and a strongerinterest in news, and at the same time their cognitivecapacity to consume news grows (Huang, 2009).Two factors explain this: young people identify newspaperswith the adult world (Raeymaeckers, 2004);young people have a utilitarian view of press – whenthe topics and content affect them directly they willread them, if not, they will ignore them as they theircontent and format do not fit their needs and expectations(Vanderbosch, Dhoets & Van der Bulck, 2009).In this sense, most young people associate newspaperconsumption to professional activity and their incorporationinto the labor market (Lipani, 2008).The genre variable corroborates that young menread newspapers more than women. The surveyshows that 40.6% of men read the press every day,while women register 19% (Table 1), revealing a cleargenre gap in newspaper consumption.4.2. Accessing mediaToday’s overabundance of information is due tothe fact that news is not only provided by newspapers.Young people now have a wide range of media tochoose from to get information and the results indicatethat they indeed use several platforms to read thenews. The use of television (watched by 72.1% ofthose polled) is significant but secondary to the socialnetworks as a media for news consumption amongyoung people (Table 2). Websites such as Facebookor Tuenti are now the leading information outlets foryoung people (77.4%), which is especially relevant fortwo reasons.Firstly because it verifies that young people’s informationconsumption is increasingly online (Parratt,<strong>Comunicar</strong>, <strong>39</strong>, XX, 2012Table 1: Frequency of newspaper reading per age segment (in %).© ISSN: 1134-3478 • e-ISSN: 1988-3293• Pages 151-158
- Page 2 and 3:
© COMUNICAR, 39; XXLATIN AMERICAN
- Page 4 and 5:
4Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012C O N T E N
- Page 6 and 7:
6Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Submission
- Page 8 and 9:
8Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012EditorialTh
- Page 10 and 11:
10Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Introducti
- Page 12 and 13:
12Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012All these
- Page 14 and 15:
14Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012civic part
- Page 16 and 17:
16Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 18 and 19:
18Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012ponsible u
- Page 20 and 21:
20Comunicar, 39, XX, 20122.3.3. Cas
- Page 22 and 23:
22Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012best pract
- Page 24 and 25:
24Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN: 1
- Page 26 and 27:
26Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 28 and 29:
28Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012tors for a
- Page 30 and 31:
30Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012This compe
- Page 32 and 33:
32Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Croce, 200
- Page 34 and 35:
34Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN: 1
- Page 36 and 37:
36Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 38 and 39:
38Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012the approp
- Page 40 and 41:
40Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Table 3: I
- Page 42 and 43:
42Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012racy could
- Page 44 and 45:
44Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN: 1
- Page 46 and 47:
46Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 48 and 49:
48Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012data, the
- Page 50 and 51:
50Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012habits of
- Page 52 and 53:
52Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Acknowledg
- Page 54 and 55:
54Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 56 and 57:
56Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012and the ne
- Page 58 and 59:
58Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012interest i
- Page 60 and 61:
60Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012land, medi
- Page 62 and 63:
62Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012more than
- Page 64 and 65:
64Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN: 1
- Page 66 and 67:
66Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 68 and 69:
68Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Internet.
- Page 70 and 71:
70Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012basic feat
- Page 72 and 73:
72Comunicar, 35, XVIII, 2010(www.cy
- Page 74 and 75:
74Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 76 and 77:
76Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012country an
- Page 78 and 79:
78Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012was precis
- Page 80 and 81:
80Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012end, not a
- Page 82 and 83:
82Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introdu
- Page 84 and 85:
84Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012media thro
- Page 86 and 87:
86Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012tegies for
- Page 88 and 89:
88Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012researcher
- Page 90 and 91:
90Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN: 1
- Page 92 and 93:
92Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. The imp
- Page 94 and 95:
94Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012literacy i
- Page 96 and 97:
96Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Finally, t
- Page 98 and 99:
98Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012them. The
- Page 100 and 101:
100Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 102 and 103: 102Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012«What ma
- Page 104 and 105: 104Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012categoriz
- Page 106 and 107: 106Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121) Being
- Page 108 and 109: 108Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012aprendiza
- Page 110 and 111: 110Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 112 and 113: 112Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 114 and 115: 114Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Antena3,
- Page 116 and 117: 116Comunicar, 39, XX, 201224 to 29
- Page 118 and 119: 118Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Opera. Lo
- Page 120 and 121: 120Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 122 and 123: 122Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012hypertext
- Page 124 and 125: 124Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Figure 1.
- Page 126 and 127: 126Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012needs, gr
- Page 128 and 129: 128Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 130 and 131: 130Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 132 and 133: 132Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121999; Sac
- Page 134 and 135: 134Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012• Analy
- Page 136 and 137: 136Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012young; pa
- Page 138 and 139: 138Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 140 and 141: 140Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 142 and 143: 142Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121, and co
- Page 144 and 145: 144Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Figure 5.
- Page 146 and 147: 146Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012can be de
- Page 148 and 149: 148Comunicar, 39, XX, 20129.6. Focu
- Page 150 and 151: 150Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 154 and 155: 154Comunicar, 39, XX, 20122010), sp
- Page 156 and 157: 156Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012media use
- Page 158 and 159: 158Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012QAYYUM, M
- Page 160 and 161: 160Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 162 and 163: 162Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012variety o
- Page 164 and 165: 164Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Figure 1.
- Page 166 and 167: 166Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012contribut
- Page 168 and 169: 168Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 170 and 171: 170Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 172 and 173: 172Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012meanings:
- Page 174 and 175: 174Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012This comp
- Page 176 and 177: 176Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Reference
- Page 178 and 179: 178Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 180 and 181: 180Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012eating ha
- Page 182 and 183: 182Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012shows tha
- Page 184 and 185: 184Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012© ISSN:
- Page 186 and 187: 186Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 188 and 189: 188Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012famous).
- Page 190 and 191: 190Comunicar, 39, XX, 20123.2.3. Th
- Page 192 and 193: 192Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012BIRESSI,
- Page 194 and 195: 194Comunicar, 39, XX, 20121. Introd
- Page 196 and 197: 196Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Table 1.
- Page 198 and 199: 198Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012Graph 3.
- Page 200 and 201: 200Comunicar, 39, XX, 2012In one of