31.07.2015 Views

WHO Drug Information Vol. 24, No. 4, 2010

WHO Drug Information Vol. 24, No. 4, 2010

WHO Drug Information Vol. 24, No. 4, 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WHO</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Information</strong> <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>24</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. 4, <strong>2010</strong><strong>WHO</strong> Prequalification Programmes<strong>2010</strong>. The area of service delivery is richin both academic research and practicalapplication [1]; the area of service design,however, is specific to the organization,application, and recipients of the service.Figure 1 on page 294 illustrates theprocess used by PQP to identify andcodify important services related to theprequalification of medicines.A survey development process wasdesigned to obtain input from within theorganization and from regulatory andquality assurance professionals in pharmaceuticalcompanies. The overall aim ofthis process was to capture and includethe knowledge and experience of PQP sothat, when combined with the “voice ofthe customer”, survey contents would beboth relevant and actionable.Interclarity Research developed topicguides and facilitated discussions, interviewsand working sessions for bothinternal and external phases of theprocess. Internal working sessions, bothin conference call and in-person formats,were conducted with key PQP membersand groups (e.g. programme management,PQP assessors and PQP inspectors).Following the internal review, indepthtelephone interviews were conductedwith industry professionals familiarwith PQP. In both phases of the surveydevelopment process, the emphasis wason identifying, from a participant’s point ofview, important stages in the <strong>WHO</strong>prequalification process — aspects thatwork well and those that fall short ofparticipant expectation. To gain greaterclarity around important issues associatedwith service delivery, efforts weremade in the “voice of the customer” toidentify detailed descriptions of servicedelivery for both favourable and unfavourableevents, as experienced by PQPmanufacturer participants [2, 3].A list of candidate survey items related tothe PQP service process was developedfrom the findings of internal and externalqualitative research. Further analysis ofthe qualitative findings suggested thatservice delivery aspects of PQP would bewell-represented by items included in theSERVQUAL scale of service quality [4].SERVQUAL is a widely-applied scale formeasuring the quality of service delivery.Developed in the 1980s, it has beenrefined and applied over the past 25years.Survey construction and deploymentThe survey was divided into four mainsections:1. Experience with PQP.2. PQP Service Design (“process”).3. PQP Service Delivery (“people”).4. Other Aspects of PQP.The first section includes an introductionto the survey and questions that provideindicators and measures of previousexperience with PQP. Section 2 (ServiceDesign) is “custom” to PQP – developedas a result of a process review with PQPstaff and the series of interviews withpharmaceutical manufacturers. Thissection includes two multi-item questionson PQP aspects common to both assessmentand inspection environments, andtwo separate multi-item questions eachfor regulatory affairs and quality assuranceprofessionals respectively. InSection 3 (Service Delivery), measuringthe people component with SERVQUALrequires five separate multi-item questionseach for the assessment of productdossiers and on-site inspections respectively.The items in Section 4 are alsocustom to PQP and include measuresrelated to the advocacy, training andcompliance aspects of PQP.Incorporating both common and application-specificitems in a single surveymade deploying the questionnaire on theInternet advantageous. The appropriateprogramming logic was developed to295

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!