02.09.2015 Views

Diane Larsen-Freeman

larsen-freeman-techniques-and-principles-in-language-teaching

larsen-freeman-techniques-and-principles-in-language-teaching

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132 Communicative Language Teaching<br />

8 What is the role of the students' native language?<br />

Ju dicious use of the students' nati ve language is permitted in CLT.<br />

Ho wever; whenever possible, the target langua ge should he used not<br />

only during communicative activities, but also for explaining the<br />

acti vities to the students or in ass igning homework. Th e stu dents<br />

learn from these classroom management exchanges, too, and realize<br />

that the target language is a vehicle for communication, not just an<br />

object to be studied.<br />

9 How is evaluation accomplished?<br />

A teacher evalu ates no t on ly the students' accu racy, but also their fluency.<br />

The student who has the most contro l of the structures and<br />

voca bulary is not always the best communicator.<br />

A teache r can informally evaluate his students' performance in his<br />

role as an advise r or co -com municator. For more for mal evaluation, a<br />

teac her is likely to usc an integrative test which has a real com municative<br />

function. In order to assess students' writing skill, for<br />

instan ce, a teacher might ask rhcm to wr ite a letter to a friend.<br />

10 How does the teacher respond to student errors?<br />

Errors of for m arc tolerated during fluency-based activities and are<br />

seen as a na rural outcome of the development of communication<br />

skills. Students can have limited linguistic knowledge and still he<br />

successful communicators. Th e teacher Illay note the errors during<br />

fluency act ivities and return to them later with an accuracy-based<br />

activity.<br />

REVIEWING THE TECHNIQUES AND THE MATERIALS<br />

T here ma y be aspects of CIT chat you find appealing. T his review has<br />

been provided in the event yOll wish to try to use an y of the techniques or<br />

ma terials associated with CIT,<br />

Authentic materials<br />

To overcom e the typical problem tha t students cannot transfer what<br />

the}'learn in the classroom to the outsid e wo rld and to expose students to<br />

natu ral language in a variety of situat ions, adherents of C I.T advocate<br />

the usc o f lan guage materials a uthent ic to native speakers of the target<br />

Communicative l.angnage Teaching 1.B<br />

language.I In this lesson we sec rhar the teacher uses a real new spa per<br />

article. He also assigns the students homework, requiring that they listen<br />

to a live radio or television broad cast.<br />

Ofcourse, the class that we observe d was ar the high intermediate level<br />

of proficiency. For students with lower proficiency in the target language,<br />

it ma y not be possible to use langua ge materials Stich as these. More<br />

accessible materials (for example, the use of a weather forecast when<br />

working on predictions), or at least ones that are rea listic, are most desirab<br />

le. Wirh a lower level class it is possible to use realia thar do not con tain<br />

a lor of language, bur a bout which a lot of discussion could be ge ne rated.<br />

Menu s in rho rargcr language are an ex ample; timeta bles arc another.<br />

Scramb led sentences<br />

Th e students are given a pa ssage (a text ) in which the sentences are in a<br />

scrambled order. T his may be a passage they have work ed with or ouc rhey<br />

ha ve not seen before. T hey arc told to unscramble the sentences so that the<br />

sentences arc restored to their origina l order. T his type of exercise teaches<br />

stude nts about the cohesio n and coherence properties of language, T hey<br />

learn how sentences arc bound together at the suprascnrcmiallevel through<br />

formal linguistic dev ices such as pronouns, which mak e a text cohesive,<br />

an d sema ntic propositions, which unify a text and make it co herent.<br />

In addition ro written passages, students might also be asked to<br />

unscramble the lines of a mixed-up dia log. Or they might he asked ro put<br />

the pictures of a picture strip story in order and write lines ro accompany<br />

the pictures.<br />

language games<br />

Gam es are used frequently in CLT. Th e students fi nd them enjoyable, and<br />

if they are properl y designed, they give stu de nts valua ble communicative<br />

pract ice. M or row's three featu res of communicative acriviries were manifested<br />

in the card game we observed in the following way: An informacion<br />

gap existed because the speaker did not know what her class r nnrc<br />

was going to do the fo llowing weekend. Th e speaker had a choice as to<br />

what she would predict (which sport) and how she wo uld predict it (which<br />

form her prediction would take). The speaker received feedback fro m the<br />

mcm bcrs of her group. Jf her predic tion was incom prchcnsi ble, then none<br />

I Of C() \lr~c, what i. auth ent ic and IU fU rJl lO nat ive 'f"'akcr, uf the target I.1nguagc i, not '" to<br />

learners in the classroom. WhJI i, iruportanri, tha t these lIlal ~r i a l ~ arc used in a way that i ~ rC;11<br />

fur learners (Widdow, un 19911 l.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!