06.09.2015 Views

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> direction usually undergo change. Speed<br />

may either increase or decrease; the change<br />

of direction usually depends upon what<br />

happens to the speed.<br />

If the refracting medium has characteristics<br />

which change gradually wit hin the<br />

material, the speed <strong>and</strong> direction of the<br />

refracted wave will also change gradually as<br />

the wave proceeds in the material.<br />

The ionized layer is such a medium; its<br />

makeup changes - both from minute to<br />

minute (<strong>and</strong> other periodic changes) <strong>and</strong> at<br />

various points within the layer at the same<br />

time.<br />

Thus a wave transmitted from the earth<br />

will be bent or refracted only sligh tly as it<br />

enters the ionized layer, but the deeper it<br />

penetrates into the layer the more its direction<br />

is changed. When the original direction<br />

has been changed enough to turn it around a<br />

corner, the wave is moving out of the<br />

material rather than in, <strong>and</strong> then the change<br />

in direction becomes less the farther it<br />

travels.<br />

Eventually the wave will co me back out<br />

of the layer, provided that the refraction<br />

doesn't just happen to trap it completely<br />

within the layer <strong>and</strong> bend it only enough to<br />

keep it trapped. Even if this should happen<br />

at some spot, there arc enough irregularities<br />

in the layers that the energy would escape<br />

elswhere - <strong>and</strong> such an action may be at<br />

least partially responsible for some types of<br />

fading.<br />

As Fig. 2 shows, when the wave emerges<br />

from the layer there is no way at all you can<br />

_.- ---<br />

---_.~----<br />

""<br />

/ ,<br />

/ -,<br />

/<br />

.><br />

,<br />

--<br />

-- , "<br />

.<br />

..<br />

,<br />

/ "<br />

,,~- --- ---------<br />

~--<br />

Fig. 2 - Refraction of radio wave in ionosphere<br />

IS cause of apparent "reflection" of skip signals<br />

as shown here. Since ionization level changes<br />

gradually within an ionized layer. angle of<br />

refraction is continually changing. This bends<br />

wave back in new d irection, making it appear to<br />

have been reflected from a su <strong>rf</strong>ace at somewhat<br />

greater height (dashed line). Wave reaching<br />

layer at shallow angle (dotted) does not penetrate<br />

so deeply as one hitting at sharp angle<br />

(solid); therefore it is bent less <strong>and</strong> so retu rns to<br />

earth at greater range than difference of angles<br />

alone would indicate.<br />

determine that it wasn't simply reflected<br />

from a sharp su<strong>rf</strong>ace at a somewhat greater<br />

height. This fictional reflecting su<strong>rf</strong>ace's<br />

height is what is referred to as the "virtual<br />

height" of the skip layers.<br />

The reason we know it works by refraction<br />

rather than reflection is that the virtual<br />

height of a layer appears to change with the<br />

angle at which energy hits it. The sha llower<br />

the angle, the lower the virtual height. You<br />

can see from the dotted-line example in fig.<br />

2 that this would be expected wit h refraction,<br />

but not wit h reflection.<br />

This mechanism in the ionisphere indicates<br />

that the angle at which the signal will<br />

be "reflected" depends critically upo n the<br />

angle at which the signal arrives, <strong>and</strong> also<br />

upon the condition of the ionized layer at<br />

that particular time. High-frequency signals<br />

packing more punch per photon, bore right<br />

on through much more readily than do those<br />

of lower frequency - so that as you keep<br />

going u p in frequency. you find a point at<br />

which the signal simply doesn't come back<br />

down. Instead, it bores on out headed<br />

toward outer space.<br />

The angle at which the signal hits the<br />

layer depends, in turn, upon the act ual angle<br />

at which the wave leaves the transmitting<br />

antenna. This depends upon the antenna<br />

design, its height above electrical ground,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the nature of the ground su<strong>rf</strong>ace within<br />

several wavelengths of the antenna site. The<br />

lower the angle at which the signal leaves,<br />

the more shallow will be the angle at which<br />

it hits the refracting layer, <strong>and</strong> the greater<br />

will be the distance covered before it returns<br />

to earth.<br />

Any substance which is capable of refracting<br />

the wave can cause "reflection" by<br />

refraction in this same manner. In addition<br />

to the horizontal ionized layers which make<br />

up the ionisphere, <strong>rf</strong> signals are frequently<br />

"reflected" from the aurora borealis <strong>and</strong><br />

from the trails of ionization left behind by<br />

meteors. At VHF, similar effects are caused<br />

at the boundary between different layers of<br />

air in the atmosphere.<br />

Ho w Does Reflection Affect the Signal?<br />

True reflection has virtually no effect upon<br />

the signal, except that its phase changes<br />

180 0 during the process of reflection. " Reflection"<br />

by means of the refraction effect,<br />

though, can affect a signal in many ways.<br />

Reflection of VHF signals from the shimmering<br />

veils of ionizati on which are known<br />

to science as the aurora <strong>and</strong> to the general<br />

public as " the Northern lights" offers several<br />

examples of such effects.<br />

The aurora is a rapidly moving affair. Its<br />

106 73 MAGAZINE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!