06.09.2015 Views

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

,<br />

("("s "<br />

Unit<br />

Attenuator<br />

Edward A. Lawrence, WASSWD/6<br />

218 Haloid<br />

Ridgecrest, Calif. 93555<br />

Since the topic of "S meters" is a popular<br />

one among radio amateurs, a lot of time is<br />

spent describing these devices, usually along<br />

the lines of how generous or "Scotch" the<br />

meters are at the QTII of the parties in the<br />

QSO. After a few such QSO's, I decided to<br />

build an attenuatar, calibrated in "S" units.<br />

My aim was to attain an accuracy of I db or<br />

better, using 5% ~w resistors <strong>and</strong> simple<br />

construction so it would be easy to duplicate.<br />

What I wound up with is very similar to<br />

the attenuatar described on page 40, January<br />

'67, 73.<br />

As a sidelight, I started out by calculating<br />

both "tee" <strong>and</strong> " pi" pads, <strong>and</strong> used "pi"<br />

because all values of resistance are close to<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard values, but (especially for high<br />

attenuation pads) the values for "tee" pacts<br />

can get quite small; <strong>and</strong> expensive.<br />

I figured the values required from the<br />

tables in the Allied's "Electronics Data<br />

H<strong>and</strong>book", page 8, 5th edition. (Allied<br />

Radio, 75c, full of good info.)<br />

Since HS" units are supposed to be 6 db, I<br />

figured data for steps of 1,2 ,4 <strong>and</strong> 8 times<br />

that amount, or 6,12,24 <strong>and</strong> 48 db. With<br />

these steps, any number from 0 to 15 "5"<br />

units of attenuation could be selected. However,<br />

8 "S" units proved to be too much for<br />

one step, as shown by the lowered attenuation<br />

at 30 MHz, due to the inherent shunt<br />

capacitance of the resistor used in the series<br />

leg, plus the stray capacitance of the switch.<br />

So I removed the 8 "S" unit step <strong>and</strong><br />

installed another 4 "5" unit step. This allows<br />

selected steps of attenuation from 0 to II<br />

"5" units.<br />

Here are the values I calculated, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

actual values used, based on 51 ohms. The<br />

steps are switched in series, as required for<br />

the desired attenuation.<br />

Front panel showing the switches for the<br />

various steps of attenuation.<br />

Resistance Values for 51 Ohm Attenuator:<br />

"S" units DB<br />

1 6 154 150 38 39<br />

2 12 85 82 96 100<br />

4 24 58 56 4ffi 390<br />

8 48 51.5 51 64006800<br />

After the attenuator was completed, the<br />

attenuation was measured at 3 kHz <strong>and</strong> at 30<br />

MHz. With the test equipment available it<br />

was possible to measure more accurately at<br />

30 MHz than at 3 kHz. Below is the data<br />

from the tests.<br />

Atten Step Predicted Measured Measured<br />

"S" units DB etten DB at 3 kH z at 30 MHz<br />

1 6 6.2 6.0 6.02<br />

2 12 12.3 12.2 12.16<br />

4 24 23.3 24.2 24.05<br />

8 48 48.5 47.5 39.11<br />

Now if we want to make an educated guess<br />

as to how far up we can expect good results.<br />

say I db error out of 24 db, then we can use<br />

the measured error in the 48 db step to calculate<br />

the capacitance across the series leg,<br />

<strong>and</strong> from that calculate the frequency where<br />

the I db error will occur. Go through the<br />

math if that is how you get your kicks, or<br />

take my word for it. It comes out to about<br />

2 pF. And this will cause a reduction of I db<br />

at about 220 MHz. And since the resistor is<br />

Rl<br />

ideal actual<br />

R2<br />

ideal actual<br />

14 73 MAGAZINE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!